A Comparative Analysis of Middle-of-Line Contact Architectures for Complementary FETs

In this paper, we have investigated various middle-of-line contact architectures applied to monolithic complementary FET inverters and have performed a comparative analysis to assess their respective advantages and limitations. For each scheme, we carried out segmentation analysis of resistance and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seung Kyu Kim, Johyeon Kim, Gunhee Choi, Kee-Won Kwon, Jongwook Jeon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2025-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10816635/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841550784846626816
author Seung Kyu Kim
Johyeon Kim
Gunhee Choi
Kee-Won Kwon
Jongwook Jeon
author_facet Seung Kyu Kim
Johyeon Kim
Gunhee Choi
Kee-Won Kwon
Jongwook Jeon
author_sort Seung Kyu Kim
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, we have investigated various middle-of-line contact architectures applied to monolithic complementary FET inverters and have performed a comparative analysis to assess their respective advantages and limitations. For each scheme, we carried out segmentation analysis of resistance and capacitance, and evaluated the DC performance as well as the power-performance characteristics alongside enhancement strategies. The middle VIA scheme features the lowest capacitance but exhibits inferior AC performance to the conventional structure due to the high resistance of the increased contact region parts and the highly doped silicon. The wrap-around-contact (WAC) structure, and the top metal source/drain (TMS) structure which is formed by increasing the contact depth of the top-placed NMOS, have in common that the external resistance is greatly reduced by enlarging the contact area and shortening the length of the high-resistance power VIA. Despite the trade-off with higher capacitance, AC performances of WAC and TMS are improved by 9.0% and 6.5%, respectively, for the same dynamic power. A sensitivity analysis was also performed to clarify the impact of MOL resistance and capacitance on AC performance. The performance gain when applied only to the drain side is less than 1%, highlighting the importance of minimizing the resistance on the source side. In addition, the segmentation analysis of resistance and capacitance shows that while WAC offers the best inverter performance, TMS provides higher DC performance and lower capacitance for NMOS. A hybrid approach using TMS for NMOS and WAC for PMOS combined with further optimization to reduce capacitance on the drain side, would result in an 11.1% speed improvement or a 22.7% reduction in dynamic power consumption.
format Article
id doaj-art-97c6e9a2f1f24d91ba9b8fccf11596b0
institution Kabale University
issn 2169-3536
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IEEE
record_format Article
series IEEE Access
spelling doaj-art-97c6e9a2f1f24d91ba9b8fccf11596b02025-01-10T00:01:30ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362025-01-01135396540510.1109/ACCESS.2024.352343410816635A Comparative Analysis of Middle-of-Line Contact Architectures for Complementary FETsSeung Kyu Kim0https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9132-2620Johyeon Kim1https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1714-4021Gunhee Choi2Kee-Won Kwon3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4513-8532Jongwook Jeon4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5232-650XDepartment of Semiconductor and Display Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si, South KoreaDepartment of Semiconductor Convergence Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si, South KoreaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si, South KoreaDepartment of Semiconductor and Display Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si, South KoreaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si, South KoreaIn this paper, we have investigated various middle-of-line contact architectures applied to monolithic complementary FET inverters and have performed a comparative analysis to assess their respective advantages and limitations. For each scheme, we carried out segmentation analysis of resistance and capacitance, and evaluated the DC performance as well as the power-performance characteristics alongside enhancement strategies. The middle VIA scheme features the lowest capacitance but exhibits inferior AC performance to the conventional structure due to the high resistance of the increased contact region parts and the highly doped silicon. The wrap-around-contact (WAC) structure, and the top metal source/drain (TMS) structure which is formed by increasing the contact depth of the top-placed NMOS, have in common that the external resistance is greatly reduced by enlarging the contact area and shortening the length of the high-resistance power VIA. Despite the trade-off with higher capacitance, AC performances of WAC and TMS are improved by 9.0% and 6.5%, respectively, for the same dynamic power. A sensitivity analysis was also performed to clarify the impact of MOL resistance and capacitance on AC performance. The performance gain when applied only to the drain side is less than 1%, highlighting the importance of minimizing the resistance on the source side. In addition, the segmentation analysis of resistance and capacitance shows that while WAC offers the best inverter performance, TMS provides higher DC performance and lower capacitance for NMOS. A hybrid approach using TMS for NMOS and WAC for PMOS combined with further optimization to reduce capacitance on the drain side, would result in an 11.1% speed improvement or a 22.7% reduction in dynamic power consumption.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10816635/Complementary FET (CFET)design-technology co-optimization (DTCO)metal source-drainmiddle-of-line (MOL)middle VIA (MV)wrap around contact (WAC)
spellingShingle Seung Kyu Kim
Johyeon Kim
Gunhee Choi
Kee-Won Kwon
Jongwook Jeon
A Comparative Analysis of Middle-of-Line Contact Architectures for Complementary FETs
IEEE Access
Complementary FET (CFET)
design-technology co-optimization (DTCO)
metal source-drain
middle-of-line (MOL)
middle VIA (MV)
wrap around contact (WAC)
title A Comparative Analysis of Middle-of-Line Contact Architectures for Complementary FETs
title_full A Comparative Analysis of Middle-of-Line Contact Architectures for Complementary FETs
title_fullStr A Comparative Analysis of Middle-of-Line Contact Architectures for Complementary FETs
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Analysis of Middle-of-Line Contact Architectures for Complementary FETs
title_short A Comparative Analysis of Middle-of-Line Contact Architectures for Complementary FETs
title_sort comparative analysis of middle of line contact architectures for complementary fets
topic Complementary FET (CFET)
design-technology co-optimization (DTCO)
metal source-drain
middle-of-line (MOL)
middle VIA (MV)
wrap around contact (WAC)
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10816635/
work_keys_str_mv AT seungkyukim acomparativeanalysisofmiddleoflinecontactarchitecturesforcomplementaryfets
AT johyeonkim acomparativeanalysisofmiddleoflinecontactarchitecturesforcomplementaryfets
AT gunheechoi acomparativeanalysisofmiddleoflinecontactarchitecturesforcomplementaryfets
AT keewonkwon acomparativeanalysisofmiddleoflinecontactarchitecturesforcomplementaryfets
AT jongwookjeon acomparativeanalysisofmiddleoflinecontactarchitecturesforcomplementaryfets
AT seungkyukim comparativeanalysisofmiddleoflinecontactarchitecturesforcomplementaryfets
AT johyeonkim comparativeanalysisofmiddleoflinecontactarchitecturesforcomplementaryfets
AT gunheechoi comparativeanalysisofmiddleoflinecontactarchitecturesforcomplementaryfets
AT keewonkwon comparativeanalysisofmiddleoflinecontactarchitecturesforcomplementaryfets
AT jongwookjeon comparativeanalysisofmiddleoflinecontactarchitecturesforcomplementaryfets