Experiments for the role of sliding connection in rigid faced GRS walls under transverse relative settlement

The transverse relative settlement of reinforced fill and fascia induces reinforcement loads additional to service loads in Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Walls. The fascia-reinforcement connections need due attention in such conditions for both strength and serviceability considerations. A slid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohan Krishna Kolli, Amit Prashant
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Soils and Foundations
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624001355
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841560156013330432
author Mohan Krishna Kolli
Amit Prashant
author_facet Mohan Krishna Kolli
Amit Prashant
author_sort Mohan Krishna Kolli
collection DOAJ
description The transverse relative settlement of reinforced fill and fascia induces reinforcement loads additional to service loads in Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Walls. The fascia-reinforcement connections need due attention in such conditions for both strength and serviceability considerations. A sliding connection is an alternative to avoid the buildup of high reinforcement connection loads under the relative settlement. 1-g model tests were carried out in an in-house developed relative settlement simulator tank on full-height panel rigid fascia (RF) GRS walls with two types of conventional connection systems. The sliding connection system was developed and proposed for RF-GRS walls, and its performance was assessed under the relative settlement of fill. In RF-GRS walls with conventional connection systems, the maximum tensile strains increased more than 200 times in bottom reinforcement layers under the relative settlement of 0 to 200 mm compared to the end of the construction. The developed sliding connection systems reduced the stress concentrations at the connection and allowed almost free settlement of the fill relative to the fascia. The maximum reinforcement strains were reduced up to 50 times compared to conventional non-sliding connections under the relative settlement of 0 to 200 mm. Hence, the sliding connection systems are recommended in conditions where the relative settlement of fascia and fill is expected to affect RF-GRS walls’ performance.
format Article
id doaj-art-fbaf0b959d3e4e39baa799666f886307
institution Kabale University
issn 2524-1788
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Soils and Foundations
spelling doaj-art-fbaf0b959d3e4e39baa799666f8863072025-01-05T04:27:45ZengElsevierSoils and Foundations2524-17882025-02-01651101557Experiments for the role of sliding connection in rigid faced GRS walls under transverse relative settlementMohan Krishna Kolli0Amit Prashant1Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, IndiaCorresponding author.; Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, IndiaThe transverse relative settlement of reinforced fill and fascia induces reinforcement loads additional to service loads in Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Walls. The fascia-reinforcement connections need due attention in such conditions for both strength and serviceability considerations. A sliding connection is an alternative to avoid the buildup of high reinforcement connection loads under the relative settlement. 1-g model tests were carried out in an in-house developed relative settlement simulator tank on full-height panel rigid fascia (RF) GRS walls with two types of conventional connection systems. The sliding connection system was developed and proposed for RF-GRS walls, and its performance was assessed under the relative settlement of fill. In RF-GRS walls with conventional connection systems, the maximum tensile strains increased more than 200 times in bottom reinforcement layers under the relative settlement of 0 to 200 mm compared to the end of the construction. The developed sliding connection systems reduced the stress concentrations at the connection and allowed almost free settlement of the fill relative to the fascia. The maximum reinforcement strains were reduced up to 50 times compared to conventional non-sliding connections under the relative settlement of 0 to 200 mm. Hence, the sliding connection systems are recommended in conditions where the relative settlement of fascia and fill is expected to affect RF-GRS walls’ performance.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624001355Transverse relative settlementNon-sliding connectionSliding connection1-g model testsFull-height panelGRS walls
spellingShingle Mohan Krishna Kolli
Amit Prashant
Experiments for the role of sliding connection in rigid faced GRS walls under transverse relative settlement
Soils and Foundations
Transverse relative settlement
Non-sliding connection
Sliding connection
1-g model tests
Full-height panel
GRS walls
title Experiments for the role of sliding connection in rigid faced GRS walls under transverse relative settlement
title_full Experiments for the role of sliding connection in rigid faced GRS walls under transverse relative settlement
title_fullStr Experiments for the role of sliding connection in rigid faced GRS walls under transverse relative settlement
title_full_unstemmed Experiments for the role of sliding connection in rigid faced GRS walls under transverse relative settlement
title_short Experiments for the role of sliding connection in rigid faced GRS walls under transverse relative settlement
title_sort experiments for the role of sliding connection in rigid faced grs walls under transverse relative settlement
topic Transverse relative settlement
Non-sliding connection
Sliding connection
1-g model tests
Full-height panel
GRS walls
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080624001355
work_keys_str_mv AT mohankrishnakolli experimentsfortheroleofslidingconnectioninrigidfacedgrswallsundertransverserelativesettlement
AT amitprashant experimentsfortheroleofslidingconnectioninrigidfacedgrswallsundertransverserelativesettlement