Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine versus Bilastine for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in the Pediatric Population: An Observer-blinded Randomized Control Trial

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refers to urticaria that has no specific cause or trigger, present on most days of the week for 6 weeks or more. The incidence of chronic urticaria in the pediatric age group is between 0.1% and 3%. Levocetirizine and bilastine are nonsedative second-g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Debashree Sahoo, Maitreyee Panda, Ajaya Kumar Jena, Anil Kumar Panda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Indian Journal of Paediatric Dermatology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijpd.ijpd_61_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841550069914927104
author Debashree Sahoo
Maitreyee Panda
Ajaya Kumar Jena
Anil Kumar Panda
author_facet Debashree Sahoo
Maitreyee Panda
Ajaya Kumar Jena
Anil Kumar Panda
author_sort Debashree Sahoo
collection DOAJ
description Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refers to urticaria that has no specific cause or trigger, present on most days of the week for 6 weeks or more. The incidence of chronic urticaria in the pediatric age group is between 0.1% and 3%. Levocetirizine and bilastine are nonsedative second-generation antihistamines used to treat urticaria in both adults and children. Objective: The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness of levocetirizine and bilastine in cases of pediatric CSU using Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) and Urticaria Severity Score (USS). The secondary objective was to evaluate and compare the safety and quality of life (QoL) using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, observer-blinded study where 65 patients (6–16 years) with a history of urticaria >6 weeks were divided into two groups with computer-generated randomization. Thirty-two patients were included in Group A, who received levocetirizine, and 33 patients were included in Group B, who received bilastine. UAS7, USS, and DLQI were recorded at every visit. The primary outcome was measured using UAS and USS and the secondary outcome in the form of patient’s QoL was assessed using the DLQI score. Laboratory parameters were assessed at the first visit and at the end of 3 months. Results: There was a significant difference (P = 0.002) in UAS7, USS, and DLQI between the baseline and last visit scores for each group. There was no significant difference (P = 0.28) in the scores between the two groups. Laboratory parameters like liver enzymes and complete blood count also did not show any significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: Both levocetirizine and bilastine are equally effective and safe in the treatment of CSU at the end of 3 months. However, bilastine showed a better fall in the DLQI as compared to levocetirizine.
format Article
id doaj-art-f8a911c32896495c9fda8f47f05821c5
institution Kabale University
issn 2319-7250
2319-7269
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Paediatric Dermatology
spelling doaj-art-f8a911c32896495c9fda8f47f05821c52025-01-10T09:57:13ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Paediatric Dermatology2319-72502319-72692024-12-0125428529010.4103/ijpd.ijpd_61_24Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine versus Bilastine for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in the Pediatric Population: An Observer-blinded Randomized Control TrialDebashree SahooMaitreyee PandaAjaya Kumar JenaAnil Kumar PandaBackground: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refers to urticaria that has no specific cause or trigger, present on most days of the week for 6 weeks or more. The incidence of chronic urticaria in the pediatric age group is between 0.1% and 3%. Levocetirizine and bilastine are nonsedative second-generation antihistamines used to treat urticaria in both adults and children. Objective: The primary objective was to compare the effectiveness of levocetirizine and bilastine in cases of pediatric CSU using Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) and Urticaria Severity Score (USS). The secondary objective was to evaluate and compare the safety and quality of life (QoL) using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, observer-blinded study where 65 patients (6–16 years) with a history of urticaria >6 weeks were divided into two groups with computer-generated randomization. Thirty-two patients were included in Group A, who received levocetirizine, and 33 patients were included in Group B, who received bilastine. UAS7, USS, and DLQI were recorded at every visit. The primary outcome was measured using UAS and USS and the secondary outcome in the form of patient’s QoL was assessed using the DLQI score. Laboratory parameters were assessed at the first visit and at the end of 3 months. Results: There was a significant difference (P = 0.002) in UAS7, USS, and DLQI between the baseline and last visit scores for each group. There was no significant difference (P = 0.28) in the scores between the two groups. Laboratory parameters like liver enzymes and complete blood count also did not show any significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: Both levocetirizine and bilastine are equally effective and safe in the treatment of CSU at the end of 3 months. However, bilastine showed a better fall in the DLQI as compared to levocetirizine.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijpd.ijpd_61_24bilastinecomparisonlevocetirizinepediatric urticarial
spellingShingle Debashree Sahoo
Maitreyee Panda
Ajaya Kumar Jena
Anil Kumar Panda
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine versus Bilastine for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in the Pediatric Population: An Observer-blinded Randomized Control Trial
Indian Journal of Paediatric Dermatology
bilastine
comparison
levocetirizine
pediatric urticarial
title Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine versus Bilastine for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in the Pediatric Population: An Observer-blinded Randomized Control Trial
title_full Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine versus Bilastine for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in the Pediatric Population: An Observer-blinded Randomized Control Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine versus Bilastine for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in the Pediatric Population: An Observer-blinded Randomized Control Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine versus Bilastine for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in the Pediatric Population: An Observer-blinded Randomized Control Trial
title_short Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Levocetirizine versus Bilastine for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in the Pediatric Population: An Observer-blinded Randomized Control Trial
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of levocetirizine versus bilastine for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria in the pediatric population an observer blinded randomized control trial
topic bilastine
comparison
levocetirizine
pediatric urticarial
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/ijpd.ijpd_61_24
work_keys_str_mv AT debashreesahoo comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoflevocetirizineversusbilastineforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariainthepediatricpopulationanobserverblindedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT maitreyeepanda comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoflevocetirizineversusbilastineforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariainthepediatricpopulationanobserverblindedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT ajayakumarjena comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoflevocetirizineversusbilastineforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariainthepediatricpopulationanobserverblindedrandomizedcontroltrial
AT anilkumarpanda comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoflevocetirizineversusbilastineforthetreatmentofchronicspontaneousurticariainthepediatricpopulationanobserverblindedrandomizedcontroltrial