Safety and Effectiveness of Electrical and Pharmacological Cardioversion in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Part 2: Assessment of Safety

Aim. To compare safety of new class III antiarrhythmic drug Refralon with direct current cardioversion (DCC) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Material and methods. 60 patients with persistent AF were randomized to groups of DCC (n=30) and pharmacologic conversion (PCV; n=30). Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Yu. Mironov, V. V. Vlodzyanovskiy, Yu. A. Yuricheva, S. F. Sokolov, S. P. Golitsyn, L. V. Rosenstraukh, E. I. Chazov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Столичная издательская компания 2019-01-01
Series:Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/1794
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849227694526431232
author N. Yu. Mironov
V. V. Vlodzyanovskiy
Yu. A. Yuricheva
S. F. Sokolov
S. P. Golitsyn
L. V. Rosenstraukh
E. I. Chazov
author_facet N. Yu. Mironov
V. V. Vlodzyanovskiy
Yu. A. Yuricheva
S. F. Sokolov
S. P. Golitsyn
L. V. Rosenstraukh
E. I. Chazov
author_sort N. Yu. Mironov
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To compare safety of new class III antiarrhythmic drug Refralon with direct current cardioversion (DCC) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Material and methods. 60 patients with persistent AF were randomized to groups of DCC (n=30) and pharmacologic conversion (PCV; n=30). There were no significant differences in age, sex, AF duration, concomitant cardiovascular diseases, CHA2DS2-VASc score and echocardiographic parameters between the groups compared. Initial assessment excluded contraindications to restore sinus rhythm (SR). In DCC group two attempts using biphasic synchronized shocks of 150 J and 170 J were performed. In PCV group patients received up to three subsequent intravenous injections of Refralon 10 μg/kg (maximal dose 30 μg/kg). Results. There were no mortality, stroke, transient ischemic attack, ventricular arrhythmia, asystole longer than 3,0 sec (primary safety criteria) in both groups. Prolongation of QT interval longer than 500 ms observed in 1 of 30 patients (3,3%) in DCC group and in 7 of 30 patients (23,3%) in PCV group. 2 patients (one patient in each group; 3,3%) developed asymptomatic bradycardia after conversion to SR that resolved spontaneously within 30 minutes. 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for secondary safety criteria is [0,02-0,38] for QT prolongation and [-0,04-0,04] for bradycardia. Conclusion. Safety of PCV is noninferior to DCC in patients with persistent AF in terms of primary safety criteria and bradyarrhythmias. More frequent QT interval prolongation to values >500 ms observed in PCV group points to necessity of precautions with use of the drug.
format Article
id doaj-art-f47249aaf92d44f9aa129d5064c2d1e0
institution Kabale University
issn 1819-6446
2225-3653
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Столичная издательская компания
record_format Article
series Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
spelling doaj-art-f47249aaf92d44f9aa129d5064c2d1e02025-08-23T10:00:30ZengСтоличная издательская компанияРациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии1819-64462225-36532019-01-0114682683010.20996/1819-6446-2018-14-6-826-8301545Safety and Effectiveness of Electrical and Pharmacological Cardioversion in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Part 2: Assessment of SafetyN. Yu. Mironov0V. V. Vlodzyanovskiy1Yu. A. Yuricheva2S. F. Sokolov3S. P. Golitsyn4L. V. Rosenstraukh5E. I. Chazov6National Medical Research Center of CardiologyNational Medical Research Center of CardiologyNational Medical Research Center of CardiologyNational Medical Research Center of CardiologyNational Medical Research Center of CardiologyNational Medical Research Center of CardiologyNational Medical Research Center of CardiologyAim. To compare safety of new class III antiarrhythmic drug Refralon with direct current cardioversion (DCC) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Material and methods. 60 patients with persistent AF were randomized to groups of DCC (n=30) and pharmacologic conversion (PCV; n=30). There were no significant differences in age, sex, AF duration, concomitant cardiovascular diseases, CHA2DS2-VASc score and echocardiographic parameters between the groups compared. Initial assessment excluded contraindications to restore sinus rhythm (SR). In DCC group two attempts using biphasic synchronized shocks of 150 J and 170 J were performed. In PCV group patients received up to three subsequent intravenous injections of Refralon 10 μg/kg (maximal dose 30 μg/kg). Results. There were no mortality, stroke, transient ischemic attack, ventricular arrhythmia, asystole longer than 3,0 sec (primary safety criteria) in both groups. Prolongation of QT interval longer than 500 ms observed in 1 of 30 patients (3,3%) in DCC group and in 7 of 30 patients (23,3%) in PCV group. 2 patients (one patient in each group; 3,3%) developed asymptomatic bradycardia after conversion to SR that resolved spontaneously within 30 minutes. 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for secondary safety criteria is [0,02-0,38] for QT prolongation and [-0,04-0,04] for bradycardia. Conclusion. Safety of PCV is noninferior to DCC in patients with persistent AF in terms of primary safety criteria and bradyarrhythmias. More frequent QT interval prolongation to values >500 ms observed in PCV group points to necessity of precautions with use of the drug.https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/1794atrial fibrillationdirect current cardioversionpharmacological cardioversioneffectivenesssafetyrefralon
spellingShingle N. Yu. Mironov
V. V. Vlodzyanovskiy
Yu. A. Yuricheva
S. F. Sokolov
S. P. Golitsyn
L. V. Rosenstraukh
E. I. Chazov
Safety and Effectiveness of Electrical and Pharmacological Cardioversion in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Part 2: Assessment of Safety
Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии
atrial fibrillation
direct current cardioversion
pharmacological cardioversion
effectiveness
safety
refralon
title Safety and Effectiveness of Electrical and Pharmacological Cardioversion in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Part 2: Assessment of Safety
title_full Safety and Effectiveness of Electrical and Pharmacological Cardioversion in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Part 2: Assessment of Safety
title_fullStr Safety and Effectiveness of Electrical and Pharmacological Cardioversion in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Part 2: Assessment of Safety
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Effectiveness of Electrical and Pharmacological Cardioversion in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Part 2: Assessment of Safety
title_short Safety and Effectiveness of Electrical and Pharmacological Cardioversion in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Part 2: Assessment of Safety
title_sort safety and effectiveness of electrical and pharmacological cardioversion in persistent atrial fibrillation part 2 assessment of safety
topic atrial fibrillation
direct current cardioversion
pharmacological cardioversion
effectiveness
safety
refralon
url https://www.rpcardio.online/jour/article/view/1794
work_keys_str_mv AT nyumironov safetyandeffectivenessofelectricalandpharmacologicalcardioversioninpersistentatrialfibrillationpart2assessmentofsafety
AT vvvlodzyanovskiy safetyandeffectivenessofelectricalandpharmacologicalcardioversioninpersistentatrialfibrillationpart2assessmentofsafety
AT yuayuricheva safetyandeffectivenessofelectricalandpharmacologicalcardioversioninpersistentatrialfibrillationpart2assessmentofsafety
AT sfsokolov safetyandeffectivenessofelectricalandpharmacologicalcardioversioninpersistentatrialfibrillationpart2assessmentofsafety
AT spgolitsyn safetyandeffectivenessofelectricalandpharmacologicalcardioversioninpersistentatrialfibrillationpart2assessmentofsafety
AT lvrosenstraukh safetyandeffectivenessofelectricalandpharmacologicalcardioversioninpersistentatrialfibrillationpart2assessmentofsafety
AT eichazov safetyandeffectivenessofelectricalandpharmacologicalcardioversioninpersistentatrialfibrillationpart2assessmentofsafety