Effective low-cost pediatric vision screening by naive nonophthalmic examiners using the ‘Arclight’ device

Purpose: To explore whether a low-cost ophthalmoscope (Arclight) can be used by naive nonophthalmic examiners to effectively screen for pediatric eye disease. Methods: Fifty-four children (108 eyes) were examined by five medical students using an Arclight. Gold standard examination was performed by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rujuta Gore, Jenny N Wang, Christopher D Yang, Miranda An, Stephen C Hunter, Kourosh Shahraki, Andrew Blaikie, Donny W Suh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/IJO.IJO_3027_23
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556833734492160
author Rujuta Gore
Jenny N Wang
Christopher D Yang
Miranda An
Stephen C Hunter
Kourosh Shahraki
Andrew Blaikie
Donny W Suh
author_facet Rujuta Gore
Jenny N Wang
Christopher D Yang
Miranda An
Stephen C Hunter
Kourosh Shahraki
Andrew Blaikie
Donny W Suh
author_sort Rujuta Gore
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To explore whether a low-cost ophthalmoscope (Arclight) can be used by naive nonophthalmic examiners to effectively screen for pediatric eye disease. Methods: Fifty-four children (108 eyes) were examined by five medical students using an Arclight. Gold standard examination was performed by an ophthalmologist using a slit lamp and indirect ophthalmoscope. Examinations performed included ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc, estimation of the cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), corneal light reflex test (CRT), Bruckner’s reflex test (BRT), and evaluation of refractive error. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the nonophthalmologist’s Arclight exam compared to the gold standard findings of comprehensive evaluation by pediatric ophthalmologists. Results: Using the Arclight, the optic nerve exam was successfully completed in 65% of patients. CDRs above and below 0.5 could be determined with 66.7% sensitivity and 84.4% specificity. Arclight CRT measurements were significant (P < .00001) predictors of strabismus, with 80% sensitivity, 95.1%, specificity, 80% PPV, and 95.1% NPV. BRT was not a significant predictor of amblyopia, with a 34.6% sensitivity, 85.7% specificity, 69.2% PPV, and 58.5% NPV. Refractive error was estimated with a success rate of 81% for emmetropia, 38% for myopia, and 21% for hyperopia. The Arclight ease-of-use was rated on average as 4.4 (SD = 0.9) on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the hardest and 5 being the easiest. Conclusions: Our study shows the Arclight as an affordable and effective alternative to the traditional ophthalmoscope for assessing eye disease in children. This device can improve eye health services in under-resourced regions.
format Article
id doaj-art-f401e4cf20734a25885e3cbd28224a32
institution Kabale University
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-f401e4cf20734a25885e3cbd28224a322025-01-07T06:27:42ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892025-01-01731414410.4103/IJO.IJO_3027_23Effective low-cost pediatric vision screening by naive nonophthalmic examiners using the ‘Arclight’ deviceRujuta GoreJenny N WangChristopher D YangMiranda AnStephen C HunterKourosh ShahrakiAndrew BlaikieDonny W SuhPurpose: To explore whether a low-cost ophthalmoscope (Arclight) can be used by naive nonophthalmic examiners to effectively screen for pediatric eye disease. Methods: Fifty-four children (108 eyes) were examined by five medical students using an Arclight. Gold standard examination was performed by an ophthalmologist using a slit lamp and indirect ophthalmoscope. Examinations performed included ophthalmoscopy of the optic disc, estimation of the cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), corneal light reflex test (CRT), Bruckner’s reflex test (BRT), and evaluation of refractive error. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the nonophthalmologist’s Arclight exam compared to the gold standard findings of comprehensive evaluation by pediatric ophthalmologists. Results: Using the Arclight, the optic nerve exam was successfully completed in 65% of patients. CDRs above and below 0.5 could be determined with 66.7% sensitivity and 84.4% specificity. Arclight CRT measurements were significant (P < .00001) predictors of strabismus, with 80% sensitivity, 95.1%, specificity, 80% PPV, and 95.1% NPV. BRT was not a significant predictor of amblyopia, with a 34.6% sensitivity, 85.7% specificity, 69.2% PPV, and 58.5% NPV. Refractive error was estimated with a success rate of 81% for emmetropia, 38% for myopia, and 21% for hyperopia. The Arclight ease-of-use was rated on average as 4.4 (SD = 0.9) on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the hardest and 5 being the easiest. Conclusions: Our study shows the Arclight as an affordable and effective alternative to the traditional ophthalmoscope for assessing eye disease in children. This device can improve eye health services in under-resourced regions.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/IJO.IJO_3027_23arclightnaive nonophthalmic examinervision screening
spellingShingle Rujuta Gore
Jenny N Wang
Christopher D Yang
Miranda An
Stephen C Hunter
Kourosh Shahraki
Andrew Blaikie
Donny W Suh
Effective low-cost pediatric vision screening by naive nonophthalmic examiners using the ‘Arclight’ device
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
arclight
naive nonophthalmic examiner
vision screening
title Effective low-cost pediatric vision screening by naive nonophthalmic examiners using the ‘Arclight’ device
title_full Effective low-cost pediatric vision screening by naive nonophthalmic examiners using the ‘Arclight’ device
title_fullStr Effective low-cost pediatric vision screening by naive nonophthalmic examiners using the ‘Arclight’ device
title_full_unstemmed Effective low-cost pediatric vision screening by naive nonophthalmic examiners using the ‘Arclight’ device
title_short Effective low-cost pediatric vision screening by naive nonophthalmic examiners using the ‘Arclight’ device
title_sort effective low cost pediatric vision screening by naive nonophthalmic examiners using the arclight device
topic arclight
naive nonophthalmic examiner
vision screening
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/IJO.IJO_3027_23
work_keys_str_mv AT rujutagore effectivelowcostpediatricvisionscreeningbynaivenonophthalmicexaminersusingthearclightdevice
AT jennynwang effectivelowcostpediatricvisionscreeningbynaivenonophthalmicexaminersusingthearclightdevice
AT christopherdyang effectivelowcostpediatricvisionscreeningbynaivenonophthalmicexaminersusingthearclightdevice
AT mirandaan effectivelowcostpediatricvisionscreeningbynaivenonophthalmicexaminersusingthearclightdevice
AT stephenchunter effectivelowcostpediatricvisionscreeningbynaivenonophthalmicexaminersusingthearclightdevice
AT kouroshshahraki effectivelowcostpediatricvisionscreeningbynaivenonophthalmicexaminersusingthearclightdevice
AT andrewblaikie effectivelowcostpediatricvisionscreeningbynaivenonophthalmicexaminersusingthearclightdevice
AT donnywsuh effectivelowcostpediatricvisionscreeningbynaivenonophthalmicexaminersusingthearclightdevice