Protocol: What works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision‐making: A systematic review
Abstract This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: Our aim is to collect, assess, and synthesise all the available empirical evidence on what works to support evidence‐informed decision‐making by policymakers. In doing so, we will aim to answer the followi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Campbell Systematic Reviews |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1435 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846100287363743744 |
|---|---|
| author | Promise Nduku John Ategeka Andile Madonsela Tanya Mdlalose Jennifer Stevenson Shannon Shisler Suvarna Pande Laurenz Mahlanza‐Langer |
| author_facet | Promise Nduku John Ategeka Andile Madonsela Tanya Mdlalose Jennifer Stevenson Shannon Shisler Suvarna Pande Laurenz Mahlanza‐Langer |
| author_sort | Promise Nduku |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: Our aim is to collect, assess, and synthesise all the available empirical evidence on what works to support evidence‐informed decision‐making by policymakers. In doing so, we will aim to answer the following research questions: What are the impacts of interventions to support evidence‐informed decision‐making by policymakers? What are the factors which have influenced the impact of these interventions, and their design and implementation in low‐ and middle‐income countries? In answering these questions, our goal is to estimate the overall impact and relative effectiveness of different interventions, identify factors or configurations of factors that support or hinder their effectiveness in low‐ and middle‐income countries and to identify gaps and areas for future primary research. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f12a651ccd7f45548c8efae64bea8b0c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1891-1803 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Campbell Systematic Reviews |
| spelling | doaj-art-f12a651ccd7f45548c8efae64bea8b0c2024-12-30T11:10:29ZengWileyCampbell Systematic Reviews1891-18032024-12-01204n/an/a10.1002/cl2.1435Protocol: What works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision‐making: A systematic reviewPromise Nduku0John Ategeka1Andile Madonsela2Tanya Mdlalose3Jennifer Stevenson4Shannon Shisler5Suvarna Pande6Laurenz Mahlanza‐Langer7Pan‐African Collective Evidence (PACE) Johannesburg South AfricaPan‐African Collective Evidence (PACE) Johannesburg South AfricaPan‐African Collective Evidence (PACE) Johannesburg South AfricaPan‐African Collective Evidence (PACE) Johannesburg South AfricaInternational Initiative for Impact Evaluation 3ieInternational Initiative for Impact Evaluation 3ieInternational Initiative for Impact Evaluation 3iePan‐African Collective Evidence (PACE) Johannesburg South AfricaAbstract This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: Our aim is to collect, assess, and synthesise all the available empirical evidence on what works to support evidence‐informed decision‐making by policymakers. In doing so, we will aim to answer the following research questions: What are the impacts of interventions to support evidence‐informed decision‐making by policymakers? What are the factors which have influenced the impact of these interventions, and their design and implementation in low‐ and middle‐income countries? In answering these questions, our goal is to estimate the overall impact and relative effectiveness of different interventions, identify factors or configurations of factors that support or hinder their effectiveness in low‐ and middle‐income countries and to identify gaps and areas for future primary research.https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1435evidence‐informed decision‐makingknowledge translationmeta‐analysispolicymakingresearch usesystematic review |
| spellingShingle | Promise Nduku John Ategeka Andile Madonsela Tanya Mdlalose Jennifer Stevenson Shannon Shisler Suvarna Pande Laurenz Mahlanza‐Langer Protocol: What works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision‐making: A systematic review Campbell Systematic Reviews evidence‐informed decision‐making knowledge translation meta‐analysis policymaking research use systematic review |
| title | Protocol: What works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision‐making: A systematic review |
| title_full | Protocol: What works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision‐making: A systematic review |
| title_fullStr | Protocol: What works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision‐making: A systematic review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Protocol: What works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision‐making: A systematic review |
| title_short | Protocol: What works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision‐making: A systematic review |
| title_sort | protocol what works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision making a systematic review |
| topic | evidence‐informed decision‐making knowledge translation meta‐analysis policymaking research use systematic review |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1435 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT promisenduku protocolwhatworkstoincreasetheuseofevidenceforpolicydecisionmakingasystematicreview AT johnategeka protocolwhatworkstoincreasetheuseofevidenceforpolicydecisionmakingasystematicreview AT andilemadonsela protocolwhatworkstoincreasetheuseofevidenceforpolicydecisionmakingasystematicreview AT tanyamdlalose protocolwhatworkstoincreasetheuseofevidenceforpolicydecisionmakingasystematicreview AT jenniferstevenson protocolwhatworkstoincreasetheuseofevidenceforpolicydecisionmakingasystematicreview AT shannonshisler protocolwhatworkstoincreasetheuseofevidenceforpolicydecisionmakingasystematicreview AT suvarnapande protocolwhatworkstoincreasetheuseofevidenceforpolicydecisionmakingasystematicreview AT laurenzmahlanzalanger protocolwhatworkstoincreasetheuseofevidenceforpolicydecisionmakingasystematicreview |