The Reverse Lunge: A Descriptive Electromyographic Study

Limited studies exist examining the reverse lunge. The purpose of this study was to describe the activation of the rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), gluteus medius (GMed), and gluteus maximus (GMax) of both limbs during a bodyweight reverse lunge movement. A secondary purpose was to describe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barbara J. Hoogenboom, Madison Ferguson, Zac Krauss, Stephanie Tran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/24/11480
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846106171197358080
author Barbara J. Hoogenboom
Madison Ferguson
Zac Krauss
Stephanie Tran
author_facet Barbara J. Hoogenboom
Madison Ferguson
Zac Krauss
Stephanie Tran
author_sort Barbara J. Hoogenboom
collection DOAJ
description Limited studies exist examining the reverse lunge. The purpose of this study was to describe the activation of the rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), gluteus medius (GMed), and gluteus maximus (GMax) of both limbs during a bodyweight reverse lunge movement. A secondary purpose was to describe the phases of the stationary (non-moving) and lead (moving) limbs during the reverse lunge. Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to record the activity of the target muscles in 20 healthy adults (10 male, 10 female; aged 22–25). Root mean squared values for mean maximum and average percent activation normalized to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) activation were calculated. Descriptive terminology was created to describe the phases of the lunge for both limbs. The mean maximum percentage of muscle activation for the RF and BF was greater in the lead limb, while GMed and GMax activations were greater in the stationary limb. Only the lead limb RF and stationary limb GMed reached a strengthening stimulus in mean maximum percentage measurements. Clinically, it may be important to consider when each muscle is maximally active and at what percentage of its MVIC to properly prescribe the reverse lunge in a safe manner.
format Article
id doaj-art-eed0f5e63b5f40db8cd14a93e15c62bc
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-3417
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-eed0f5e63b5f40db8cd14a93e15c62bc2024-12-27T14:07:23ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172024-12-0114241148010.3390/app142411480The Reverse Lunge: A Descriptive Electromyographic StudyBarbara J. Hoogenboom0Madison Ferguson1Zac Krauss2Stephanie Tran3Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USADepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USADepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USADepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USALimited studies exist examining the reverse lunge. The purpose of this study was to describe the activation of the rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), gluteus medius (GMed), and gluteus maximus (GMax) of both limbs during a bodyweight reverse lunge movement. A secondary purpose was to describe the phases of the stationary (non-moving) and lead (moving) limbs during the reverse lunge. Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to record the activity of the target muscles in 20 healthy adults (10 male, 10 female; aged 22–25). Root mean squared values for mean maximum and average percent activation normalized to maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) activation were calculated. Descriptive terminology was created to describe the phases of the lunge for both limbs. The mean maximum percentage of muscle activation for the RF and BF was greater in the lead limb, while GMed and GMax activations were greater in the stationary limb. Only the lead limb RF and stationary limb GMed reached a strengthening stimulus in mean maximum percentage measurements. Clinically, it may be important to consider when each muscle is maximally active and at what percentage of its MVIC to properly prescribe the reverse lunge in a safe manner.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/24/11480electromyographymuscular activityrehabilitationreverse lunge
spellingShingle Barbara J. Hoogenboom
Madison Ferguson
Zac Krauss
Stephanie Tran
The Reverse Lunge: A Descriptive Electromyographic Study
Applied Sciences
electromyography
muscular activity
rehabilitation
reverse lunge
title The Reverse Lunge: A Descriptive Electromyographic Study
title_full The Reverse Lunge: A Descriptive Electromyographic Study
title_fullStr The Reverse Lunge: A Descriptive Electromyographic Study
title_full_unstemmed The Reverse Lunge: A Descriptive Electromyographic Study
title_short The Reverse Lunge: A Descriptive Electromyographic Study
title_sort reverse lunge a descriptive electromyographic study
topic electromyography
muscular activity
rehabilitation
reverse lunge
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/24/11480
work_keys_str_mv AT barbarajhoogenboom thereverselungeadescriptiveelectromyographicstudy
AT madisonferguson thereverselungeadescriptiveelectromyographicstudy
AT zackrauss thereverselungeadescriptiveelectromyographicstudy
AT stephanietran thereverselungeadescriptiveelectromyographicstudy
AT barbarajhoogenboom reverselungeadescriptiveelectromyographicstudy
AT madisonferguson reverselungeadescriptiveelectromyographicstudy
AT zackrauss reverselungeadescriptiveelectromyographicstudy
AT stephanietran reverselungeadescriptiveelectromyographicstudy