Influence of different cavity disinfectants on composite adhesion to dentin of primary teeth: An in vitro study
Restorative treatment is the most common approach to treating dental caries. However, after cavity preparation, some microorganisms may still persist in the substrate, suggesting the use of cavity disinfectants. Nevertheless, their effect on adhesion to composite resins is not yet fully understood,...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Heliyon |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024162949 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846125432053694464 |
|---|---|
| author | Ana Coelho Luís Vilhena Mariana Cordeiro Inês Amaro Anabela Paula Carlos Miguel Marto Cristina Cardoso Silva Manuel Marques Ferreira Eunice Carrilho Amílcar Ramalho |
| author_facet | Ana Coelho Luís Vilhena Mariana Cordeiro Inês Amaro Anabela Paula Carlos Miguel Marto Cristina Cardoso Silva Manuel Marques Ferreira Eunice Carrilho Amílcar Ramalho |
| author_sort | Ana Coelho |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Restorative treatment is the most common approach to treating dental caries. However, after cavity preparation, some microorganisms may still persist in the substrate, suggesting the use of cavity disinfectants. Nevertheless, their effect on adhesion to composite resins is not yet fully understood, especially in primary teeth. The study aimed to assess the impact of five different cavity disinfectants on dentin adhesion in primary teeth. A total of 60 primary molars were uniformly flattened at their occlusal thirds and randomly allocated into six groups (n = 10 each): Control; Glutaraldehyde; Chlorhexidine; EDTA; Ethanol; Aloe vera. All disinfectants were actively applied, rinsed, and air-dried. The adhesion procedure was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the restoration was positioned using a mold. Shear bond strength was evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed (One-way ANOVA with Post-hoc Tukey test), with the level of significance set at 5 %. Glutaraldehyde (14.59 ± 3.89 MPa), Chlorhexidine (11.24 ± 2.25 MPa), and EDTA (11.04 ± 2.95 MPa) did not impair the shear bond strength when compared to the Control group (14.95 ± 2.75 MPa). Ethanol and Aloe vera application significantly lowered SBS. The results suggest that Glutaraldehyde, Chlorhexidine, and EDTA can be used as cavity disinfectants. Nevertheless, further in vitro and clinical research is required. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e5c73162e3cc4ea6a2c957d700dea246 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2405-8440 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Heliyon |
| spelling | doaj-art-e5c73162e3cc4ea6a2c957d700dea2462024-12-13T10:58:37ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402024-12-011023e40263Influence of different cavity disinfectants on composite adhesion to dentin of primary teeth: An in vitro studyAna Coelho0Luís Vilhena1Mariana Cordeiro2Inês Amaro3Anabela Paula4Carlos Miguel Marto5Cristina Cardoso Silva6Manuel Marques Ferreira7Eunice Carrilho8Amílcar Ramalho9Institute of Integrated Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal; Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes (CEMMPRE), University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, PortugalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes (CEMMPRE), University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, PortugalInstitute of Integrated Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, PortugalInstitute of Integrated Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal; Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes (CEMMPRE), University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, PortugalInstitute of Integrated Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal; Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes (CEMMPRE), University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, PortugalArea of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes (CEMMPRE), University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal; Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; Institute of Experimental Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; Corresponding author. Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), University of Coimbra, Portugal.Faculty of Health Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa, 4200-551 Porto, Portugal; FP – I3ID, FP – BHS, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa, 4200-551 Porto, PortugalArea of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes (CEMMPRE), University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal; Institute of Endodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, PortugalInstitute of Integrated Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal; Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes (CEMMPRE), University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, PortugalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes (CEMMPRE), University of Coimbra, 3030-788 Coimbra, PortugalRestorative treatment is the most common approach to treating dental caries. However, after cavity preparation, some microorganisms may still persist in the substrate, suggesting the use of cavity disinfectants. Nevertheless, their effect on adhesion to composite resins is not yet fully understood, especially in primary teeth. The study aimed to assess the impact of five different cavity disinfectants on dentin adhesion in primary teeth. A total of 60 primary molars were uniformly flattened at their occlusal thirds and randomly allocated into six groups (n = 10 each): Control; Glutaraldehyde; Chlorhexidine; EDTA; Ethanol; Aloe vera. All disinfectants were actively applied, rinsed, and air-dried. The adhesion procedure was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the restoration was positioned using a mold. Shear bond strength was evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed (One-way ANOVA with Post-hoc Tukey test), with the level of significance set at 5 %. Glutaraldehyde (14.59 ± 3.89 MPa), Chlorhexidine (11.24 ± 2.25 MPa), and EDTA (11.04 ± 2.95 MPa) did not impair the shear bond strength when compared to the Control group (14.95 ± 2.75 MPa). Ethanol and Aloe vera application significantly lowered SBS. The results suggest that Glutaraldehyde, Chlorhexidine, and EDTA can be used as cavity disinfectants. Nevertheless, further in vitro and clinical research is required.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024162949AdhesionCavity disinfectantsIn vitro techniquePrimary teethShear bond strength |
| spellingShingle | Ana Coelho Luís Vilhena Mariana Cordeiro Inês Amaro Anabela Paula Carlos Miguel Marto Cristina Cardoso Silva Manuel Marques Ferreira Eunice Carrilho Amílcar Ramalho Influence of different cavity disinfectants on composite adhesion to dentin of primary teeth: An in vitro study Heliyon Adhesion Cavity disinfectants In vitro technique Primary teeth Shear bond strength |
| title | Influence of different cavity disinfectants on composite adhesion to dentin of primary teeth: An in vitro study |
| title_full | Influence of different cavity disinfectants on composite adhesion to dentin of primary teeth: An in vitro study |
| title_fullStr | Influence of different cavity disinfectants on composite adhesion to dentin of primary teeth: An in vitro study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Influence of different cavity disinfectants on composite adhesion to dentin of primary teeth: An in vitro study |
| title_short | Influence of different cavity disinfectants on composite adhesion to dentin of primary teeth: An in vitro study |
| title_sort | influence of different cavity disinfectants on composite adhesion to dentin of primary teeth an in vitro study |
| topic | Adhesion Cavity disinfectants In vitro technique Primary teeth Shear bond strength |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024162949 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anacoelho influenceofdifferentcavitydisinfectantsoncompositeadhesiontodentinofprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT luisvilhena influenceofdifferentcavitydisinfectantsoncompositeadhesiontodentinofprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT marianacordeiro influenceofdifferentcavitydisinfectantsoncompositeadhesiontodentinofprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT inesamaro influenceofdifferentcavitydisinfectantsoncompositeadhesiontodentinofprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT anabelapaula influenceofdifferentcavitydisinfectantsoncompositeadhesiontodentinofprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT carlosmiguelmarto influenceofdifferentcavitydisinfectantsoncompositeadhesiontodentinofprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT cristinacardososilva influenceofdifferentcavitydisinfectantsoncompositeadhesiontodentinofprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT manuelmarquesferreira influenceofdifferentcavitydisinfectantsoncompositeadhesiontodentinofprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT eunicecarrilho influenceofdifferentcavitydisinfectantsoncompositeadhesiontodentinofprimaryteethaninvitrostudy AT amilcarramalho influenceofdifferentcavitydisinfectantsoncompositeadhesiontodentinofprimaryteethaninvitrostudy |