ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDGMENT IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW
Objective: basing on the research of formation and development of the administrative prejudgment in the Russian criminal law and comparative-legal analysis of this institution, as well as the long-term experience in crime investigation, to trace the problems and trends of administrative prejudgment...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.
2015-03-01
|
| Series: | Russian Journal of Economics and Law |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/1820 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846117122644639744 |
|---|---|
| author | A. A. Yunusov T. V. Serkova |
| author_facet | A. A. Yunusov T. V. Serkova |
| author_sort | A. A. Yunusov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective: basing on the research of formation and development of the administrative prejudgment in the Russian criminal law and comparative-legal analysis of this institution, as well as the long-term experience in crime investigation, to trace the problems and trends of administrative prejudgment and prove the necessity to introduce, or, to be more precise, legalize the administrative prejudgment in the Russian criminal law. Methods: the research is based on the general dialectic method of cognition, comparative, historical, formal-juridical methods, as well as special and private-legal methods of research. Results: analysis of the main problems and collisions of administrative prejudgment in the Russian criminal law, the doctrine and the practice of implementation of this institution can become the basis for legalization of the administrative prejudgment in the Russian criminal law and implementing it for the crimes stipulated in the Special part of the Russian Criminal Code, if they are of low or middle gravity and committed intentionally, those most often occurred. The article studies the institution of the administrative prejudgment in the Russian criminal law since 1922 until present. Various researchers’ opinions are given for and against returning of this institution. Taking into account the criminological indicators, the authors express their own opinion on legalization of the administrative prejudgment. Scientific novelty: having abandoned the formal approach to the institution of the administrative prejudgment both in the Russian criminal law and in the foreign laws, the authors believe that the criminal personality should be the central factor of the administrative prejudgment legalization. In this context the authors state the direct connection between the personal features of a criminal, including their inclination to immoral and illegal behavior, and the crime committed by them. Practical value: the theoretical conclusions formulated in the research can and should be used in scientific, law-making and practical legal activity for legalization of the administrative prejudgment. That can reduce the level of repeated crimes, differentiate criminal and administrative liability, provide an opportunity for the prompt and efficient responses to the committed crimes. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e2e6f6f5d23a48d18524e916c4567c9d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2782-2923 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015-03-01 |
| publisher | Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Russian Journal of Economics and Law |
| spelling | doaj-art-e2e6f6f5d23a48d18524e916c4567c9d2024-12-18T11:47:00ZengTatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.Russian Journal of Economics and Law2782-29232015-03-01012782821818ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDGMENT IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAWA. A. Yunusov0T. V. Serkova1Nizhnekamsk branch of the Moscow Humanitarian and Economic InstituteNizhniy Novgorod Academy of the Russian Ministry of Domestic AffiarsObjective: basing on the research of formation and development of the administrative prejudgment in the Russian criminal law and comparative-legal analysis of this institution, as well as the long-term experience in crime investigation, to trace the problems and trends of administrative prejudgment and prove the necessity to introduce, or, to be more precise, legalize the administrative prejudgment in the Russian criminal law. Methods: the research is based on the general dialectic method of cognition, comparative, historical, formal-juridical methods, as well as special and private-legal methods of research. Results: analysis of the main problems and collisions of administrative prejudgment in the Russian criminal law, the doctrine and the practice of implementation of this institution can become the basis for legalization of the administrative prejudgment in the Russian criminal law and implementing it for the crimes stipulated in the Special part of the Russian Criminal Code, if they are of low or middle gravity and committed intentionally, those most often occurred. The article studies the institution of the administrative prejudgment in the Russian criminal law since 1922 until present. Various researchers’ opinions are given for and against returning of this institution. Taking into account the criminological indicators, the authors express their own opinion on legalization of the administrative prejudgment. Scientific novelty: having abandoned the formal approach to the institution of the administrative prejudgment both in the Russian criminal law and in the foreign laws, the authors believe that the criminal personality should be the central factor of the administrative prejudgment legalization. In this context the authors state the direct connection between the personal features of a criminal, including their inclination to immoral and illegal behavior, and the crime committed by them. Practical value: the theoretical conclusions formulated in the research can and should be used in scientific, law-making and practical legal activity for legalization of the administrative prejudgment. That can reduce the level of repeated crimes, differentiate criminal and administrative liability, provide an opportunity for the prompt and efficient responses to the committed crimes.https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/1820prejudgmentcriminal legislationadministrative legislationcriminal personalityrepeated crimecrimecriminal liabilityadministrative punishment |
| spellingShingle | A. A. Yunusov T. V. Serkova ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDGMENT IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW Russian Journal of Economics and Law prejudgment criminal legislation administrative legislation criminal personality repeated crime crime criminal liability administrative punishment |
| title | ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDGMENT IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW |
| title_full | ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDGMENT IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW |
| title_fullStr | ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDGMENT IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW |
| title_full_unstemmed | ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDGMENT IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW |
| title_short | ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDGMENT IN THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW |
| title_sort | administrative prejudgment in the russian criminal law |
| topic | prejudgment criminal legislation administrative legislation criminal personality repeated crime crime criminal liability administrative punishment |
| url | https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/1820 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aayunusov administrativeprejudgmentintherussiancriminallaw AT tvserkova administrativeprejudgmentintherussiancriminallaw |