Nonspecific External Arguments in Turkish

The proposal that nonspecific arguments obligatorily remain within VP has long been a topic of discussion (Enç 1991; Diesing 1992 among others). In Turkish I propose that the constraint is even stronger; nonspecific arguments are contained in VP (Kennelly to appear) as an internal argument1, never...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sarah Kennelly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dilbilim Derneği (The Linguistics Association) 1997-12-01
Series:Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Online Access:http://dad.boun.edu.tr/issue/4534/62361
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846094739036700672
author Sarah Kennelly
author_facet Sarah Kennelly
author_sort Sarah Kennelly
collection DOAJ
description The proposal that nonspecific arguments obligatorily remain within VP has long been a topic of discussion (Enç 1991; Diesing 1992 among others). In Turkish I propose that the constraint is even stronger; nonspecific arguments are contained in VP (Kennelly to appear) as an internal argument1, never as an external argument in a Specifier position. Hence they are never subjects. By means of a study of Turkish Relative Clauses (RCs) it will be shown that nonspecific logical subjects of Unaccusatives (including Existentials and Passives) remain as internal arguments with Weak Case. This analysis then predicts that Transitive and Unergative verbs in Turkish will never have a nonspecific subject because they are base generated as external arguments in Spec.VP. In Section II the problematic data is introduced and the analysis proposed. The asymmetry of RCs is presented in Section III, which is then applied to the data in Section IV. When the internal argument of an Unaccusalivc verb is nonspecific, it must remain contained within VP and verb adjacent.
format Article
id doaj-art-dd6b3b7afd2e461587dcabf54f0b5810
institution Kabale University
issn 1300-8552
1300-8552
language English
publishDate 1997-12-01
publisher Dilbilim Derneği (The Linguistics Association)
record_format Article
series Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi
spelling doaj-art-dd6b3b7afd2e461587dcabf54f0b58102025-01-02T12:38:17ZengDilbilim Derneği (The Linguistics Association)Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi1300-85521300-85521997-12-0185875Nonspecific External Arguments in TurkishSarah KennellyThe proposal that nonspecific arguments obligatorily remain within VP has long been a topic of discussion (Enç 1991; Diesing 1992 among others). In Turkish I propose that the constraint is even stronger; nonspecific arguments are contained in VP (Kennelly to appear) as an internal argument1, never as an external argument in a Specifier position. Hence they are never subjects. By means of a study of Turkish Relative Clauses (RCs) it will be shown that nonspecific logical subjects of Unaccusatives (including Existentials and Passives) remain as internal arguments with Weak Case. This analysis then predicts that Transitive and Unergative verbs in Turkish will never have a nonspecific subject because they are base generated as external arguments in Spec.VP. In Section II the problematic data is introduced and the analysis proposed. The asymmetry of RCs is presented in Section III, which is then applied to the data in Section IV. When the internal argument of an Unaccusalivc verb is nonspecific, it must remain contained within VP and verb adjacent.http://dad.boun.edu.tr/issue/4534/62361
spellingShingle Sarah Kennelly
Nonspecific External Arguments in Turkish
Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi
title Nonspecific External Arguments in Turkish
title_full Nonspecific External Arguments in Turkish
title_fullStr Nonspecific External Arguments in Turkish
title_full_unstemmed Nonspecific External Arguments in Turkish
title_short Nonspecific External Arguments in Turkish
title_sort nonspecific external arguments in turkish
url http://dad.boun.edu.tr/issue/4534/62361
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahkennelly nonspecificexternalargumentsinturkish