Comparative study of Normal-phase versus reversed-phase HPTLC methods for the concurrent quantification of three antiviral agents against COVID19: Remdesivir, favipiravir and Molnupiravir: trichromatic sustainability assessment

Abstract The pursuit of sustainability in analytical chemistry is a multifaceted, challenging and complex endeavor. This requires continuous and competitive attempts to achieve the sustainable development goals at every step of the analytical methodology by adhering to the principles of green, blue...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dina Salah El-Kafrawy, Amira H. Abo-Gharam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-03-01
Series:BMC Chemistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-025-01439-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849334046790778880
author Dina Salah El-Kafrawy
Amira H. Abo-Gharam
author_facet Dina Salah El-Kafrawy
Amira H. Abo-Gharam
author_sort Dina Salah El-Kafrawy
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The pursuit of sustainability in analytical chemistry is a multifaceted, challenging and complex endeavor. This requires continuous and competitive attempts to achieve the sustainable development goals at every step of the analytical methodology by adhering to the principles of green, blue and white analytical chemistry. This also involves assessment of the degree of sustainability using the latest evaluation metrics until finally reaching the design of a trichromatic procedure. The herein illustrated work represents a comparative study between two newly developed normal-phase and reverse-phase HPTLC methods for the simultaneous quantitative determination of Remdesivir (RMD), Favipiravir (FAV) and Molnupiravir (MOL). For normal-phase HPTLC method, the employed mobile phase consisted of ethyl acetate: ethanol: water (9.4:0.4:0.25, v/v), while, for reverse-phase HPTLC procedure, a greener mobile phase was employed consisting of ethanol: water (6:4, v/v). For both methods, detection wavelength of RMD and MOL was 244 nm while FAV was detected at 325 nm. Both methods were validated following the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines with respect to linearity, range, accuracy, precision and robustness. The two established methods were proved to be linear over the range of 50-2000 ng/band for FAV and MOL and over the range of 30–800 ng/band for RMD. The excellent linearities were proved by the high values of correlation coefficients not less than 0.99988. The developed methods were successfully applied for the determination of the three drugs in their bulk form and in their pharmaceutical formulations. Furthermore, a thorough comparative and integrative trichromatic evaluation of sustainability of the designed methods was performed. The Analytical Eco-Scale, the novel Modified Green Analytical Procedure Index (MoGAPI) (2024) and the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metrics were applied for greenness assessment and the recent Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) (2023) tool was employed for blueness evaluation. Finally, the RGB12 model was implemented for appraisal of whiteness of the developed methods.
format Article
id doaj-art-dced32b8efba4b0ea9fa4e181bc77aa6
institution Kabale University
issn 2661-801X
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Chemistry
spelling doaj-art-dced32b8efba4b0ea9fa4e181bc77aa62025-08-20T03:45:40ZengBMCBMC Chemistry2661-801X2025-03-0119111610.1186/s13065-025-01439-9Comparative study of Normal-phase versus reversed-phase HPTLC methods for the concurrent quantification of three antiviral agents against COVID19: Remdesivir, favipiravir and Molnupiravir: trichromatic sustainability assessmentDina Salah El-Kafrawy0Amira H. Abo-Gharam1Pharmaceutical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria UniversityPharmaceutical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria UniversityAbstract The pursuit of sustainability in analytical chemistry is a multifaceted, challenging and complex endeavor. This requires continuous and competitive attempts to achieve the sustainable development goals at every step of the analytical methodology by adhering to the principles of green, blue and white analytical chemistry. This also involves assessment of the degree of sustainability using the latest evaluation metrics until finally reaching the design of a trichromatic procedure. The herein illustrated work represents a comparative study between two newly developed normal-phase and reverse-phase HPTLC methods for the simultaneous quantitative determination of Remdesivir (RMD), Favipiravir (FAV) and Molnupiravir (MOL). For normal-phase HPTLC method, the employed mobile phase consisted of ethyl acetate: ethanol: water (9.4:0.4:0.25, v/v), while, for reverse-phase HPTLC procedure, a greener mobile phase was employed consisting of ethanol: water (6:4, v/v). For both methods, detection wavelength of RMD and MOL was 244 nm while FAV was detected at 325 nm. Both methods were validated following the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines with respect to linearity, range, accuracy, precision and robustness. The two established methods were proved to be linear over the range of 50-2000 ng/band for FAV and MOL and over the range of 30–800 ng/band for RMD. The excellent linearities were proved by the high values of correlation coefficients not less than 0.99988. The developed methods were successfully applied for the determination of the three drugs in their bulk form and in their pharmaceutical formulations. Furthermore, a thorough comparative and integrative trichromatic evaluation of sustainability of the designed methods was performed. The Analytical Eco-Scale, the novel Modified Green Analytical Procedure Index (MoGAPI) (2024) and the Analytical GREEnness (AGREE) metrics were applied for greenness assessment and the recent Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI) (2023) tool was employed for blueness evaluation. Finally, the RGB12 model was implemented for appraisal of whiteness of the developed methods.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-025-01439-9Normal-phase HPTLCReverse-phase HPTLCThree anti-Covid19 agentsGreennessBluenessWhiteness
spellingShingle Dina Salah El-Kafrawy
Amira H. Abo-Gharam
Comparative study of Normal-phase versus reversed-phase HPTLC methods for the concurrent quantification of three antiviral agents against COVID19: Remdesivir, favipiravir and Molnupiravir: trichromatic sustainability assessment
BMC Chemistry
Normal-phase HPTLC
Reverse-phase HPTLC
Three anti-Covid19 agents
Greenness
Blueness
Whiteness
title Comparative study of Normal-phase versus reversed-phase HPTLC methods for the concurrent quantification of three antiviral agents against COVID19: Remdesivir, favipiravir and Molnupiravir: trichromatic sustainability assessment
title_full Comparative study of Normal-phase versus reversed-phase HPTLC methods for the concurrent quantification of three antiviral agents against COVID19: Remdesivir, favipiravir and Molnupiravir: trichromatic sustainability assessment
title_fullStr Comparative study of Normal-phase versus reversed-phase HPTLC methods for the concurrent quantification of three antiviral agents against COVID19: Remdesivir, favipiravir and Molnupiravir: trichromatic sustainability assessment
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of Normal-phase versus reversed-phase HPTLC methods for the concurrent quantification of three antiviral agents against COVID19: Remdesivir, favipiravir and Molnupiravir: trichromatic sustainability assessment
title_short Comparative study of Normal-phase versus reversed-phase HPTLC methods for the concurrent quantification of three antiviral agents against COVID19: Remdesivir, favipiravir and Molnupiravir: trichromatic sustainability assessment
title_sort comparative study of normal phase versus reversed phase hptlc methods for the concurrent quantification of three antiviral agents against covid19 remdesivir favipiravir and molnupiravir trichromatic sustainability assessment
topic Normal-phase HPTLC
Reverse-phase HPTLC
Three anti-Covid19 agents
Greenness
Blueness
Whiteness
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-025-01439-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dinasalahelkafrawy comparativestudyofnormalphaseversusreversedphasehptlcmethodsfortheconcurrentquantificationofthreeantiviralagentsagainstcovid19remdesivirfavipiravirandmolnupiravirtrichromaticsustainabilityassessment
AT amirahabogharam comparativestudyofnormalphaseversusreversedphasehptlcmethodsfortheconcurrentquantificationofthreeantiviralagentsagainstcovid19remdesivirfavipiravirandmolnupiravirtrichromaticsustainabilityassessment