An Examination of SuperDARN Backscatter Modes Using Machine Learning Guided by Ray‐Tracing

Abstract The Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) is a network of High Frequency (HF) radars that are typically used for monitoring plasma convection in the Earth's ionosphere. A majority of SuperDARN backscatter can broadly be divided into three categories: (a) ionospheric scatter due...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. S. R. Kunduri, J. B. H. Baker, J. M. Ruohoniemi, E. G. Thomas, S. G. Shepherd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-09-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003130
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536366271266816
author B. S. R. Kunduri
J. B. H. Baker
J. M. Ruohoniemi
E. G. Thomas
S. G. Shepherd
author_facet B. S. R. Kunduri
J. B. H. Baker
J. M. Ruohoniemi
E. G. Thomas
S. G. Shepherd
author_sort B. S. R. Kunduri
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) is a network of High Frequency (HF) radars that are typically used for monitoring plasma convection in the Earth's ionosphere. A majority of SuperDARN backscatter can broadly be divided into three categories: (a) ionospheric scatter due to reflections from plasma irregularities in the E and F regions of the ionosphere, (b) ground scatter caused by reflections from the ground/sea surface following reflection in the ionosphere, and (c) backscatter from meteor trails left by meteoroids as they enter the Earth's atmosphere. Due to the complex nature of HF propagation and mid‐latitude electrodynamics, it is often not straightforward to distinguish between different modes of backscatter observed by SuperDARN. In this study, we present a new two‐stage machine learning algorithm for identifying different backscatter modes in SuperDARN data. In the first stage, a neural network that “mimics” ray‐tracing is used to predict the probability of ionospheric and ground scatter occurring at a given location along with parameters like the elevation angles, reflection heights etc. The inputs to the network include parameters that control HF propagation, such as signal frequency, season, UT time, and geomagnetic activity levels. In the second stage, the output probabilities from the neural network and actual SuperDARN data are clustered together to determine the category of the backscatter. Our model can distinguish between meteor scatter, 1/2 hop E‐/F‐region ionospheric as well as ground/sea scatter. We validate our model by comparing predicted elevation angles with those measured at a SuperDARN radar.
format Article
id doaj-art-dbb7b4fdfb6c4b1997185683b801a3b7
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-dbb7b4fdfb6c4b1997185683b801a3b72025-01-14T16:31:13ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902022-09-01209n/an/a10.1029/2022SW003130An Examination of SuperDARN Backscatter Modes Using Machine Learning Guided by Ray‐TracingB. S. R. Kunduri0J. B. H. Baker1J. M. Ruohoniemi2E. G. Thomas3S. G. Shepherd4Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Virginia Tech Blacksburg VA USABradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Virginia Tech Blacksburg VA USABradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Virginia Tech Blacksburg VA USAThayer School of Engineering Dartmouth College Hanover NH USAThayer School of Engineering Dartmouth College Hanover NH USAAbstract The Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) is a network of High Frequency (HF) radars that are typically used for monitoring plasma convection in the Earth's ionosphere. A majority of SuperDARN backscatter can broadly be divided into three categories: (a) ionospheric scatter due to reflections from plasma irregularities in the E and F regions of the ionosphere, (b) ground scatter caused by reflections from the ground/sea surface following reflection in the ionosphere, and (c) backscatter from meteor trails left by meteoroids as they enter the Earth's atmosphere. Due to the complex nature of HF propagation and mid‐latitude electrodynamics, it is often not straightforward to distinguish between different modes of backscatter observed by SuperDARN. In this study, we present a new two‐stage machine learning algorithm for identifying different backscatter modes in SuperDARN data. In the first stage, a neural network that “mimics” ray‐tracing is used to predict the probability of ionospheric and ground scatter occurring at a given location along with parameters like the elevation angles, reflection heights etc. The inputs to the network include parameters that control HF propagation, such as signal frequency, season, UT time, and geomagnetic activity levels. In the second stage, the output probabilities from the neural network and actual SuperDARN data are clustered together to determine the category of the backscatter. Our model can distinguish between meteor scatter, 1/2 hop E‐/F‐region ionospheric as well as ground/sea scatter. We validate our model by comparing predicted elevation angles with those measured at a SuperDARN radar.https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003130Machine learningSuperDARNRay‐tracing
spellingShingle B. S. R. Kunduri
J. B. H. Baker
J. M. Ruohoniemi
E. G. Thomas
S. G. Shepherd
An Examination of SuperDARN Backscatter Modes Using Machine Learning Guided by Ray‐Tracing
Space Weather
Machine learning
SuperDARN
Ray‐tracing
title An Examination of SuperDARN Backscatter Modes Using Machine Learning Guided by Ray‐Tracing
title_full An Examination of SuperDARN Backscatter Modes Using Machine Learning Guided by Ray‐Tracing
title_fullStr An Examination of SuperDARN Backscatter Modes Using Machine Learning Guided by Ray‐Tracing
title_full_unstemmed An Examination of SuperDARN Backscatter Modes Using Machine Learning Guided by Ray‐Tracing
title_short An Examination of SuperDARN Backscatter Modes Using Machine Learning Guided by Ray‐Tracing
title_sort examination of superdarn backscatter modes using machine learning guided by ray tracing
topic Machine learning
SuperDARN
Ray‐tracing
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2022SW003130
work_keys_str_mv AT bsrkunduri anexaminationofsuperdarnbackscattermodesusingmachinelearningguidedbyraytracing
AT jbhbaker anexaminationofsuperdarnbackscattermodesusingmachinelearningguidedbyraytracing
AT jmruohoniemi anexaminationofsuperdarnbackscattermodesusingmachinelearningguidedbyraytracing
AT egthomas anexaminationofsuperdarnbackscattermodesusingmachinelearningguidedbyraytracing
AT sgshepherd anexaminationofsuperdarnbackscattermodesusingmachinelearningguidedbyraytracing
AT bsrkunduri examinationofsuperdarnbackscattermodesusingmachinelearningguidedbyraytracing
AT jbhbaker examinationofsuperdarnbackscattermodesusingmachinelearningguidedbyraytracing
AT jmruohoniemi examinationofsuperdarnbackscattermodesusingmachinelearningguidedbyraytracing
AT egthomas examinationofsuperdarnbackscattermodesusingmachinelearningguidedbyraytracing
AT sgshepherd examinationofsuperdarnbackscattermodesusingmachinelearningguidedbyraytracing