Parkinson’s disease quality of life at 12 months comparing invasive device-aided therapy with oral treatment

Abstract Real-world impact of device-aided therapy on quality of life (QoL) in people with Parkinson’s remains unknown. This large, retrospective, observational study assessed QoL in people transitioning to device-aided therapy (deep brain stimulation or carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension) vs. th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora, Michael S. Okun, Pavnit Kukreja, Wei Hu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-08-01
Series:npj Parkinson's Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-01093-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Real-world impact of device-aided therapy on quality of life (QoL) in people with Parkinson’s remains unknown. This large, retrospective, observational study assessed QoL in people transitioning to device-aided therapy (deep brain stimulation or carbidopa-levodopa enteral suspension) vs. those continuing oral medications. Cohorts were matched based on clinical/demographic characteristics and device-aided therapy eligibility. Primary and secondary outcomes included change from baseline (CFB) to month 12 in 39-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) and Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores, respectively. Of 608 people (oral therapy [n = 295]; device-aided therapy [n = 313]), most were male, White, and aged ≥ 60 years. Positive CFB to month 12 in PDQ-39 was significantly greater for device-aided therapy vs. oral therapy (–5.0 [95% CI, –5.9 to –4.2] vs. 0.9 [0.3–1.5]; p < 0.001). UPDRS II-IV scores improved for the device-aided therapy group. People transitioning to device-aided therapy experienced clinically meaningful QoL improvements.
ISSN:2373-8057