Methodologies for Measuring Judicial Performance: The Problem of Bias
Concerns about gender and racial bias in the survey-based evaluations of judicial performance common in the United States have persisted for decades. Consistent with a large body of basic research in the psychological sciences, recent studies confirm that the results from these JPE surveys are syst...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Main Authors: | Jennifer Elek, David Rottman | 
|---|---|
| Format: | Article | 
| Language: | English | 
| Published: | Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
    
        2014-02-01 | 
| Series: | Oñati Socio-Legal Series | 
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/330 | 
| Tags: | Add Tag 
      No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
   | 
Similar Items
- 
                
                    Thinking about Judges and Judicial Performance: Perspective of the Public and Court Users        
                          
 by: David Rottman, et al.
 Published: (2014-02-01)
- 
                
                    Judicial Performance Review in Arizona: A Critical Assessment        
                          
 by: Rebecca White Berch, et al.
 Published: (2014-02-01)
- 
                
                    Judicial Performance and Experiences of Judicial Work: Findings from Socio-legal Research        
                          
 by: Sharyn Roach Anleu, et al.
 Published: (2014-02-01)
- 
                
                    Judicial Performance and Experiences of Judicial Work: Findings from socio-legal research by Sharyn Roach Anleu & Kathy Mack: Commentary        
                          
 by: Gar Yein Ng
 Published: (2014-12-01)
- 
                
                    Judicial Perspectives on Emotion, Emotion Management, and Judicial Excellence in the USA        
                          
 by: Jennifer K Elek
 Published: (2018-11-01)
 
       