Methodologies for Measuring Judicial Performance: The Problem of Bias
Concerns about gender and racial bias in the survey-based evaluations of judicial performance common in the United States have persisted for decades. Consistent with a large body of basic research in the psychological sciences, recent studies confirm that the results from these JPE surveys are syst...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Jennifer Elek, David Rottman |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
2014-02-01
|
| Series: | Oñati Socio-Legal Series |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/330 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Thinking about Judges and Judicial Performance: Perspective of the Public and Court Users
by: David Rottman, et al.
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Judicial Performance Review in Arizona: A Critical Assessment
by: Rebecca White Berch, et al.
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Judicial Performance and Experiences of Judicial Work: Findings from Socio-legal Research
by: Sharyn Roach Anleu, et al.
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Judicial Performance and Experiences of Judicial Work: Findings from socio-legal research by Sharyn Roach Anleu & Kathy Mack: Commentary
by: Gar Yein Ng
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Judicial Perspectives on Emotion, Emotion Management, and Judicial Excellence in the USA
by: Jennifer K Elek
Published: (2018-11-01)