Electric Source Localization Adds Evidence for Task-Specific CNVs

This study was an attempt to replicate recent magnetoencephalographic (MEG) findings on human task-specific CNV sources (Basile et al., Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 90, 1994, 157–165) by means of a spatio-temporal electric source localization method (Scherg and von Cramon, Ele...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ina M. Tarkka, Luis F. H. Basile
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1998-01-01
Series:Behavioural Neurology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1998/728634
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841524748406751232
author Ina M. Tarkka
Luis F. H. Basile
author_facet Ina M. Tarkka
Luis F. H. Basile
author_sort Ina M. Tarkka
collection DOAJ
description This study was an attempt to replicate recent magnetoencephalographic (MEG) findings on human task-specific CNV sources (Basile et al., Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 90, 1994, 157–165) by means of a spatio-temporal electric source localization method (Scherg and von Cramon, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 62, 1985, 32–44; Scherg and von Cramon, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 65, 1986, 344-360; Scherg and Berg, Brain Electric Source Analysis Handbook, Version 2). The previous MEG results showed CNV sources in the prefrontal cortex of the two hemispheres for two tasks used, namely visual pattern recognition and visual spatial recognition tasks. In the right hemisphere, the sources were more anterior and inferior for the spatial recognition task than for the pattern recognition task. In the present study we obtained CNVs in five subjects during two tasks identical to the MEG study. The elicited electric potentials were modeled with four spatio-temporal dipoles for each task, three of which accounted for the visual evoked response and one that accounted for the CNV. For all subjects the dipole explaining the CNV was always localized in the frontal region of the head, however, the dipole obtained during the visual spatial recognition task was more anterior than the one obtained during the pattern recognition task. Thus, task-specific CNV sources were again observed, although the stable model consisted of only one dipole located close to the midline instead of one dipole in each hemisphere. This was a major difference in the CNV sources between the previous MEG and the present electric source analysis results. We discuss the possible basis for the difference between the two methods used to study slow brain activity that is believed to originate from extended cortical patches.
format Article
id doaj-art-d566520bae214c05a4255d35d91a5170
institution Kabale University
issn 0953-4180
1875-8584
language English
publishDate 1998-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Behavioural Neurology
spelling doaj-art-d566520bae214c05a4255d35d91a51702025-02-03T05:47:28ZengWileyBehavioural Neurology0953-41801875-85841998-01-01111212810.1155/1998/728634Electric Source Localization Adds Evidence for Task-Specific CNVsIna M. Tarkka0Luis F. H. Basile1Brain Research and Rehabilitation Center Neuron, Kuopio, FinlandDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, BrazilThis study was an attempt to replicate recent magnetoencephalographic (MEG) findings on human task-specific CNV sources (Basile et al., Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 90, 1994, 157–165) by means of a spatio-temporal electric source localization method (Scherg and von Cramon, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 62, 1985, 32–44; Scherg and von Cramon, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 65, 1986, 344-360; Scherg and Berg, Brain Electric Source Analysis Handbook, Version 2). The previous MEG results showed CNV sources in the prefrontal cortex of the two hemispheres for two tasks used, namely visual pattern recognition and visual spatial recognition tasks. In the right hemisphere, the sources were more anterior and inferior for the spatial recognition task than for the pattern recognition task. In the present study we obtained CNVs in five subjects during two tasks identical to the MEG study. The elicited electric potentials were modeled with four spatio-temporal dipoles for each task, three of which accounted for the visual evoked response and one that accounted for the CNV. For all subjects the dipole explaining the CNV was always localized in the frontal region of the head, however, the dipole obtained during the visual spatial recognition task was more anterior than the one obtained during the pattern recognition task. Thus, task-specific CNV sources were again observed, although the stable model consisted of only one dipole located close to the midline instead of one dipole in each hemisphere. This was a major difference in the CNV sources between the previous MEG and the present electric source analysis results. We discuss the possible basis for the difference between the two methods used to study slow brain activity that is believed to originate from extended cortical patches.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1998/728634
spellingShingle Ina M. Tarkka
Luis F. H. Basile
Electric Source Localization Adds Evidence for Task-Specific CNVs
Behavioural Neurology
title Electric Source Localization Adds Evidence for Task-Specific CNVs
title_full Electric Source Localization Adds Evidence for Task-Specific CNVs
title_fullStr Electric Source Localization Adds Evidence for Task-Specific CNVs
title_full_unstemmed Electric Source Localization Adds Evidence for Task-Specific CNVs
title_short Electric Source Localization Adds Evidence for Task-Specific CNVs
title_sort electric source localization adds evidence for task specific cnvs
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1998/728634
work_keys_str_mv AT inamtarkka electricsourcelocalizationaddsevidencefortaskspecificcnvs
AT luisfhbasile electricsourcelocalizationaddsevidencefortaskspecificcnvs