Accountability of Temporary Land Deed Official Not Included as Defendants in Deed Revocation Rulings
This study examines the role of the Temporary Land Deed Official (PPATS) in the issuance of legally defective deeds. The case, as adjudicated in Verdict Number 601/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tnk, indicates that the PPATS was neither designated as a Co-Defendant nor held materially liable to the disputing parties...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Faculty of Law, University of Jember
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jik.jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JIK/article/view/53651 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849331042052210688 |
|---|---|
| author | Nilna Firkhana Soraya Sukarmi Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto |
| author_facet | Nilna Firkhana Soraya Sukarmi Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto |
| author_sort | Nilna Firkhana Soraya |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study examines the role of the Temporary Land Deed Official (PPATS) in the issuance of legally defective deeds. The case, as adjudicated in Verdict Number 601/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tnk, indicates that the PPATS was neither designated as a Co-Defendant nor held materially liable to the disputing parties. In the court's consideration, the judge reasoned that the PPATS was not directly implicated in the case since the Grant Deed (Akta Hibah) was not annulled, but rather the "grant" itself. Nevertheless, the judge ruled that the Grant Deed was legally defective, lacked binding legal force, and was declared null and void by operation of law. Consequently, the verdict contains a formal defect (plurium litis consortium) due to the absence of a complete set of necessary parties in the lawsuit, which, in principle, should have resulted in the dismissal of the case. This study addresses two main issues: (1) the legal consequences of a Grant Deed that is null and void by operation of law, and (2) the actions that the PPATS can take to maintain their integrity and professional accountability in the event of such a declaration. This research employs a normative legal approach, utilizing the theory of legal responsibility as its analytical framework. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d4809da5b64c4a07bbd2fca1edd50dd0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2723-1011 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | Faculty of Law, University of Jember |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan |
| spelling | doaj-art-d4809da5b64c4a07bbd2fca1edd50dd02025-08-20T03:46:45ZengFaculty of Law, University of JemberJurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan2723-10112025-05-0161132745934Accountability of Temporary Land Deed Official Not Included as Defendants in Deed Revocation RulingsNilna Firkhana Soraya0Sukarmi1Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto2Brawijaya UniversityBrawijaya UniversityBrawijaya UniversityThis study examines the role of the Temporary Land Deed Official (PPATS) in the issuance of legally defective deeds. The case, as adjudicated in Verdict Number 601/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tnk, indicates that the PPATS was neither designated as a Co-Defendant nor held materially liable to the disputing parties. In the court's consideration, the judge reasoned that the PPATS was not directly implicated in the case since the Grant Deed (Akta Hibah) was not annulled, but rather the "grant" itself. Nevertheless, the judge ruled that the Grant Deed was legally defective, lacked binding legal force, and was declared null and void by operation of law. Consequently, the verdict contains a formal defect (plurium litis consortium) due to the absence of a complete set of necessary parties in the lawsuit, which, in principle, should have resulted in the dismissal of the case. This study addresses two main issues: (1) the legal consequences of a Grant Deed that is null and void by operation of law, and (2) the actions that the PPATS can take to maintain their integrity and professional accountability in the event of such a declaration. This research employs a normative legal approach, utilizing the theory of legal responsibility as its analytical framework.https://jik.jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JIK/article/view/53651ppatsgrant deedresponsibility |
| spellingShingle | Nilna Firkhana Soraya Sukarmi Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto Accountability of Temporary Land Deed Official Not Included as Defendants in Deed Revocation Rulings Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan ppats grant deed responsibility |
| title | Accountability of Temporary Land Deed Official Not Included as Defendants in Deed Revocation Rulings |
| title_full | Accountability of Temporary Land Deed Official Not Included as Defendants in Deed Revocation Rulings |
| title_fullStr | Accountability of Temporary Land Deed Official Not Included as Defendants in Deed Revocation Rulings |
| title_full_unstemmed | Accountability of Temporary Land Deed Official Not Included as Defendants in Deed Revocation Rulings |
| title_short | Accountability of Temporary Land Deed Official Not Included as Defendants in Deed Revocation Rulings |
| title_sort | accountability of temporary land deed official not included as defendants in deed revocation rulings |
| topic | ppats grant deed responsibility |
| url | https://jik.jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JIK/article/view/53651 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nilnafirkhanasoraya accountabilityoftemporarylanddeedofficialnotincludedasdefendantsindeedrevocationrulings AT sukarmi accountabilityoftemporarylanddeedofficialnotincludedasdefendantsindeedrevocationrulings AT patriciaaudreyruslijanto accountabilityoftemporarylanddeedofficialnotincludedasdefendantsindeedrevocationrulings |