A Criticism to Sokhan Dictionary of Metonymy
The ability of the Persian language with its cultural contexts made many Persian words and expressions have different meanings and functions under different situations. Expressing the metonymy of various phrases and expressions in the Persian language is one of these functions. For this reason, meto...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5311_80d57d769711d18eab9643c0e490bf16.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841555270853984256 |
|---|---|
| author | Arash Amraei |
| author_facet | Arash Amraei |
| author_sort | Arash Amraei |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The ability of the Persian language with its cultural contexts made many Persian words and expressions have different meanings and functions under different situations. Expressing the metonymy of various phrases and expressions in the Persian language is one of these functions. For this reason, metonymy has always been considered by linguists, poets, and authors as part of the language and culture of any society. Metonymy is the beautiful, artistic, and implicit expression of different topics used by poets and authors as a subtle technique in expressing their purposes. Due to the extensive use of metonymy by Persian poets and authors, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of metonymy is a critical and competent task. Hassan Anwari and his colleagues complied and published a dictionary called “Sokhan Dictionary of Metonymy,” which is analyzed in this study. This book was published in two volumes in 1783. After reviewing and evaluating different concepts related to the book, the book structure has been succinctly introduced. Then, the content analysis and evaluation of the book was done. It was found that since this culture has been extracted from discourse culture, except metonymy, some other irrelevant entries have been mixed with it, leading to some incongruities and misinterpretations. In so doing, some of the most egregious problems are enumerated. It was finally concluded that this book needs to be seriously revised and rectified. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-cf3416e13382426183b8539b045e5755 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2383-1650 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
| publisher | Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| spelling | doaj-art-cf3416e13382426183b8539b045e57552025-01-08T05:47:50ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی2383-16502020-06-01204254710.30465/crtls.2020.22432.14255311A Criticism to Sokhan Dictionary of MetonymyArash Amraei0Assistant Professor, Department of Basic Science and General Courses, Khorramshahr Marine Science and Technology University, IranThe ability of the Persian language with its cultural contexts made many Persian words and expressions have different meanings and functions under different situations. Expressing the metonymy of various phrases and expressions in the Persian language is one of these functions. For this reason, metonymy has always been considered by linguists, poets, and authors as part of the language and culture of any society. Metonymy is the beautiful, artistic, and implicit expression of different topics used by poets and authors as a subtle technique in expressing their purposes. Due to the extensive use of metonymy by Persian poets and authors, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of metonymy is a critical and competent task. Hassan Anwari and his colleagues complied and published a dictionary called “Sokhan Dictionary of Metonymy,” which is analyzed in this study. This book was published in two volumes in 1783. After reviewing and evaluating different concepts related to the book, the book structure has been succinctly introduced. Then, the content analysis and evaluation of the book was done. It was found that since this culture has been extracted from discourse culture, except metonymy, some other irrelevant entries have been mixed with it, leading to some incongruities and misinterpretations. In so doing, some of the most egregious problems are enumerated. It was finally concluded that this book needs to be seriously revised and rectified.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5311_80d57d769711d18eab9643c0e490bf16.pdfcritiquecultural discoursemetonymy |
| spellingShingle | Arash Amraei A Criticism to Sokhan Dictionary of Metonymy پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی critique cultural discourse metonymy |
| title | A Criticism to Sokhan Dictionary of Metonymy |
| title_full | A Criticism to Sokhan Dictionary of Metonymy |
| title_fullStr | A Criticism to Sokhan Dictionary of Metonymy |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Criticism to Sokhan Dictionary of Metonymy |
| title_short | A Criticism to Sokhan Dictionary of Metonymy |
| title_sort | criticism to sokhan dictionary of metonymy |
| topic | critique cultural discourse metonymy |
| url | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5311_80d57d769711d18eab9643c0e490bf16.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT arashamraei acriticismtosokhandictionaryofmetonymy AT arashamraei criticismtosokhandictionaryofmetonymy |