Planification stratégique et asymétries territoriales. Grenoble et le Grand Genève, deux régions urbaines alpines à l’épreuve de la cohérence.

Territorial cohesion is today a guiding principle of spatial planning, especially at city region scale. Given the extension of city region perimeters, the relationships between cities, outskirts and rural areas could undergo a renewal. The objective of this article is to show that governance process...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathalie Bertrand, Dominik Cremer-Schulte, Mathieu Perrin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut de Géographie Alpine 2016-02-01
Series:Revue de Géographie Alpine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/rga/3104
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841546755823370240
author Nathalie Bertrand
Dominik Cremer-Schulte
Mathieu Perrin
author_facet Nathalie Bertrand
Dominik Cremer-Schulte
Mathieu Perrin
author_sort Nathalie Bertrand
collection DOAJ
description Territorial cohesion is today a guiding principle of spatial planning, especially at city region scale. Given the extension of city region perimeters, the relationships between cities, outskirts and rural areas could undergo a renewal. The objective of this article is to show that governance processes in the framework of strategic spatial planning projects tend to reveal, or even to maintain, disparities between urban and peripheral territories, especially in mountain areas. Their capacities to influence the territorial projects turn out to be unequal, as territories do not have the same resources (financial, social, human and institutional capitals). On the basis of spatial planning documents and interviews, the article analyses two alpine city region planning initiatives, Greater Geneva and Grenoble city region.
format Article
id doaj-art-ce126eeb865b4620a722f2b508ea2b4d
institution Kabale University
issn 0035-1121
1760-7426
language English
publishDate 2016-02-01
publisher Institut de Géographie Alpine
record_format Article
series Revue de Géographie Alpine
spelling doaj-art-ce126eeb865b4620a722f2b508ea2b4d2025-01-10T15:55:21ZengInstitut de Géographie AlpineRevue de Géographie Alpine0035-11211760-74262016-02-01103310.4000/rga.3104Planification stratégique et asymétries territoriales. Grenoble et le Grand Genève, deux régions urbaines alpines à l’épreuve de la cohérence.Nathalie BertrandDominik Cremer-SchulteMathieu PerrinTerritorial cohesion is today a guiding principle of spatial planning, especially at city region scale. Given the extension of city region perimeters, the relationships between cities, outskirts and rural areas could undergo a renewal. The objective of this article is to show that governance processes in the framework of strategic spatial planning projects tend to reveal, or even to maintain, disparities between urban and peripheral territories, especially in mountain areas. Their capacities to influence the territorial projects turn out to be unequal, as territories do not have the same resources (financial, social, human and institutional capitals). On the basis of spatial planning documents and interviews, the article analyses two alpine city region planning initiatives, Greater Geneva and Grenoble city region.https://journals.openedition.org/rga/3104strategic planning ; urban governance ; territorial cohesion ; spatial equality ; Grenoble city region ; Greater Geneva area
spellingShingle Nathalie Bertrand
Dominik Cremer-Schulte
Mathieu Perrin
Planification stratégique et asymétries territoriales. Grenoble et le Grand Genève, deux régions urbaines alpines à l’épreuve de la cohérence.
Revue de Géographie Alpine
strategic planning ; urban governance ; territorial cohesion ; spatial equality ; Grenoble city region ; Greater Geneva area
title Planification stratégique et asymétries territoriales. Grenoble et le Grand Genève, deux régions urbaines alpines à l’épreuve de la cohérence.
title_full Planification stratégique et asymétries territoriales. Grenoble et le Grand Genève, deux régions urbaines alpines à l’épreuve de la cohérence.
title_fullStr Planification stratégique et asymétries territoriales. Grenoble et le Grand Genève, deux régions urbaines alpines à l’épreuve de la cohérence.
title_full_unstemmed Planification stratégique et asymétries territoriales. Grenoble et le Grand Genève, deux régions urbaines alpines à l’épreuve de la cohérence.
title_short Planification stratégique et asymétries territoriales. Grenoble et le Grand Genève, deux régions urbaines alpines à l’épreuve de la cohérence.
title_sort planification strategique et asymetries territoriales grenoble et le grand geneve deux regions urbaines alpines a l epreuve de la coherence
topic strategic planning ; urban governance ; territorial cohesion ; spatial equality ; Grenoble city region ; Greater Geneva area
url https://journals.openedition.org/rga/3104
work_keys_str_mv AT nathaliebertrand planificationstrategiqueetasymetriesterritorialesgrenobleetlegrandgenevedeuxregionsurbainesalpinesalepreuvedelacoherence
AT dominikcremerschulte planificationstrategiqueetasymetriesterritorialesgrenobleetlegrandgenevedeuxregionsurbainesalpinesalepreuvedelacoherence
AT mathieuperrin planificationstrategiqueetasymetriesterritorialesgrenobleetlegrandgenevedeuxregionsurbainesalpinesalepreuvedelacoherence