Enseignement, recherche, poïésis

In this paper, the author presents a different approach to research writing by first looking at the nature of the research being written. He calls into question a distinction all too often taken for granted, namely that between research and teaching, to shed light on the important links between the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kyle Conway
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université Laval 2022-07-01
Series:Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/communication/15574
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841553234151342080
author Kyle Conway
author_facet Kyle Conway
author_sort Kyle Conway
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, the author presents a different approach to research writing by first looking at the nature of the research being written. He calls into question a distinction all too often taken for granted, namely that between research and teaching, to shed light on the important links between the two. The experiential aspect of a course suffers the moment it is written down and the content set in stone. That is the first paradox. The second relates to the content itself. A course’s content is a stream of signs too dynamic for our conventional analytical tools. The third paradox concerns this setting-in-stone, which, no matter what, does not stop the course-as-text from becoming an experience once more. This is where the potential of teaching-as-research is fully realized. These analyses revisit the first two paradoxes before tackling the third in the conclusion, where the author describes how a course-as-text can become an event to be experienced once again.
format Article
id doaj-art-cbd4f756d1c1443399e2b639b8f4e4ad
institution Kabale University
issn 1189-3788
1920-7344
language fra
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Université Laval
record_format Article
series Communication
spelling doaj-art-cbd4f756d1c1443399e2b639b8f4e4ad2025-01-09T11:27:18ZfraUniversité LavalCommunication1189-37881920-73442022-07-0139110.4000/communication.15574Enseignement, recherche, poïésisKyle ConwayIn this paper, the author presents a different approach to research writing by first looking at the nature of the research being written. He calls into question a distinction all too often taken for granted, namely that between research and teaching, to shed light on the important links between the two. The experiential aspect of a course suffers the moment it is written down and the content set in stone. That is the first paradox. The second relates to the content itself. A course’s content is a stream of signs too dynamic for our conventional analytical tools. The third paradox concerns this setting-in-stone, which, no matter what, does not stop the course-as-text from becoming an experience once more. This is where the potential of teaching-as-research is fully realized. These analyses revisit the first two paradoxes before tackling the third in the conclusion, where the author describes how a course-as-text can become an event to be experienced once again.https://journals.openedition.org/communication/15574writingeventresearchtextteaching
spellingShingle Kyle Conway
Enseignement, recherche, poïésis
Communication
writing
event
research
text
teaching
title Enseignement, recherche, poïésis
title_full Enseignement, recherche, poïésis
title_fullStr Enseignement, recherche, poïésis
title_full_unstemmed Enseignement, recherche, poïésis
title_short Enseignement, recherche, poïésis
title_sort enseignement recherche poiesis
topic writing
event
research
text
teaching
url https://journals.openedition.org/communication/15574
work_keys_str_mv AT kyleconway enseignementrecherchepoiesis