Enseignement, recherche, poïésis
In this paper, the author presents a different approach to research writing by first looking at the nature of the research being written. He calls into question a distinction all too often taken for granted, namely that between research and teaching, to shed light on the important links between the...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Université Laval
2022-07-01
|
Series: | Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/communication/15574 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841553234151342080 |
---|---|
author | Kyle Conway |
author_facet | Kyle Conway |
author_sort | Kyle Conway |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this paper, the author presents a different approach to research writing by first looking at the nature of the research being written. He calls into question a distinction all too often taken for granted, namely that between research and teaching, to shed light on the important links between the two. The experiential aspect of a course suffers the moment it is written down and the content set in stone. That is the first paradox. The second relates to the content itself. A course’s content is a stream of signs too dynamic for our conventional analytical tools. The third paradox concerns this setting-in-stone, which, no matter what, does not stop the course-as-text from becoming an experience once more. This is where the potential of teaching-as-research is fully realized. These analyses revisit the first two paradoxes before tackling the third in the conclusion, where the author describes how a course-as-text can become an event to be experienced once again. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-cbd4f756d1c1443399e2b639b8f4e4ad |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1189-3788 1920-7344 |
language | fra |
publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
publisher | Université Laval |
record_format | Article |
series | Communication |
spelling | doaj-art-cbd4f756d1c1443399e2b639b8f4e4ad2025-01-09T11:27:18ZfraUniversité LavalCommunication1189-37881920-73442022-07-0139110.4000/communication.15574Enseignement, recherche, poïésisKyle ConwayIn this paper, the author presents a different approach to research writing by first looking at the nature of the research being written. He calls into question a distinction all too often taken for granted, namely that between research and teaching, to shed light on the important links between the two. The experiential aspect of a course suffers the moment it is written down and the content set in stone. That is the first paradox. The second relates to the content itself. A course’s content is a stream of signs too dynamic for our conventional analytical tools. The third paradox concerns this setting-in-stone, which, no matter what, does not stop the course-as-text from becoming an experience once more. This is where the potential of teaching-as-research is fully realized. These analyses revisit the first two paradoxes before tackling the third in the conclusion, where the author describes how a course-as-text can become an event to be experienced once again.https://journals.openedition.org/communication/15574writingeventresearchtextteaching |
spellingShingle | Kyle Conway Enseignement, recherche, poïésis Communication writing event research text teaching |
title | Enseignement, recherche, poïésis |
title_full | Enseignement, recherche, poïésis |
title_fullStr | Enseignement, recherche, poïésis |
title_full_unstemmed | Enseignement, recherche, poïésis |
title_short | Enseignement, recherche, poïésis |
title_sort | enseignement recherche poiesis |
topic | writing event research text teaching |
url | https://journals.openedition.org/communication/15574 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kyleconway enseignementrecherchepoiesis |