New glacier thickness and bed topography maps for Svalbard
<p>Knowledge of the thickness, volume, and subglacial topography of glaciers is crucial for a range of glaciological, hydrological, and societal issues, including studies on climate-warming-induced glacier retreat and associated sea level rise. This is not in the least true for Svalbard, one o...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | The Cryosphere |
| Online Access: | https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/19/1/2025/tc-19-1-2025.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | <p>Knowledge of the thickness, volume, and subglacial topography of glaciers is crucial for a range of glaciological, hydrological, and societal issues, including studies on climate-warming-induced glacier retreat and associated sea level rise. This is not in the least true for Svalbard, one of the fastest-warming places in the world. Here, we present new maps of the ice thickness and subglacial topography for every glacier on Svalbard. Using remotely sensed observations of surface height, ice velocity, rate of surface elevation change, and glacier boundaries in combination with a modelled mass balance product, we apply an inverse method that leverages state-of-the-art ice flow models to obtain the shape of the glacier bed. Specifically, we model large glaciers with the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM) at 500 m resolution, while we resolve smaller mountain glaciers at 100 m resolution using the physics-informed deep-learning-based Instructed Glacier Model (IGM). Actively surging glaciers are modelled using a perfect-plasticity model. We find a total glacier volume (excluding the island Kvitøya) of 6800 <span class="inline-formula">±</span> 238 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>3</sup></span>, corresponding to 16.3 <span class="inline-formula">±</span> 0.6 mm sea level equivalent. Validation against thickness observations shows high statistical agreement, and the combination of the three methods is found to reduce uncertainties. We discuss the remaining sources of errors, differences from previous ice thickness maps of the region, and future applications of our results.</p> |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1994-0416 1994-0424 |