Clinical Acceptability of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in People With Chronic Kidney Disease in Australian General Practice: Qualitative Study
Abstract BackgroundFuture Health Today (FHT) is a technology program that integrates with general practice clinical software to provide point of care (PoC) clinical decision support and a quality improvement dashboard. This qualitative study looks at the use of FHT in the cont...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Human Factors |
| Online Access: | https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2024/1/e55667 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846142724439277568 |
|---|---|
| author | Caroline McBride Barbara Hunter Natalie Lumsden Kaleswari Somasundaram Rita McMorrow Douglas Boyle Jon Emery Craig Nelson Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis |
| author_facet | Caroline McBride Barbara Hunter Natalie Lumsden Kaleswari Somasundaram Rita McMorrow Douglas Boyle Jon Emery Craig Nelson Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis |
| author_sort | Caroline McBride |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Abstract
BackgroundFuture Health Today (FHT) is a technology program that integrates with general practice clinical software to provide point of care (PoC) clinical decision support and a quality improvement dashboard. This qualitative study looks at the use of FHT in the context of cardiovascular disease risk in chronic kidney disease (CKD).
ObjectiveThis study aims to explore factors influencing clinical implementation of the FHT module focusing on cardiovascular risk in CKD, from the perspectives of participating general practitioner staff.
MethodsPractices in Victoria were recruited to participate in a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial using FHT, of which 19 practices were randomly assigned to use FHT’s cardiovascular risk in CKD program. A total of 13 semistructured interviews were undertaken with a nominated general practitioner (n=7) or practice nurse (n=6) from 10 participating practices. Interview questions focused on the clinical usefulness of the tool and its place in clinical workflows. Qualitative data were coded by 2 researchers and analyzed using framework analysis and Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory.
ResultsAll 13 interviewees had used the FHT PoC tool, and feedback was largely positive. Overall, clinicians described engaging with the tool as a “prompt” or “reminder” system. Themes reflected that the tool’s goals and clinical content were aligned with clinician’s existing priorities and knowledge, and the tool’s design facilitated easy integration into existing workflows. The main barrier to implementation identified by 2 clinicians was notification fatigue. A total of 7 interviewees had used the FHT dashboard tool. The main barriers to use were its limited integration into clinical workflows, such that some participants did not know of its existence; clinicians’ competing clinical priorities; and limited time to learn and use the tool.
ConclusionsThis study identified many facilitators for the successful use of the FHT PoC program, in the context of cardiovascular risk in CKD, and barriers to the use of the dashboard program. This work will be used to inform the wider implementation of FHT, as well as the development of future modules of FHT for other risk or disease states. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c93b85de8eab4f248d5657b60d0a5281 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2292-9495 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Human Factors |
| spelling | doaj-art-c93b85de8eab4f248d5657b60d0a52812024-12-03T06:03:30ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Human Factors2292-94952024-11-0111e55667e5566710.2196/55667Clinical Acceptability of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in People With Chronic Kidney Disease in Australian General Practice: Qualitative StudyCaroline McBridehttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8273-3894Barbara Hunterhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-1268-3166Natalie Lumsdenhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-7471-2487Kaleswari Somasundaramhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4330-3453Rita McMorrowhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-2835-9504Douglas Boylehttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-7083Jon Emeryhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5274-6336Craig Nelsonhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3548-4167Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervishttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2153-3482 Abstract BackgroundFuture Health Today (FHT) is a technology program that integrates with general practice clinical software to provide point of care (PoC) clinical decision support and a quality improvement dashboard. This qualitative study looks at the use of FHT in the context of cardiovascular disease risk in chronic kidney disease (CKD). ObjectiveThis study aims to explore factors influencing clinical implementation of the FHT module focusing on cardiovascular risk in CKD, from the perspectives of participating general practitioner staff. MethodsPractices in Victoria were recruited to participate in a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial using FHT, of which 19 practices were randomly assigned to use FHT’s cardiovascular risk in CKD program. A total of 13 semistructured interviews were undertaken with a nominated general practitioner (n=7) or practice nurse (n=6) from 10 participating practices. Interview questions focused on the clinical usefulness of the tool and its place in clinical workflows. Qualitative data were coded by 2 researchers and analyzed using framework analysis and Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory. ResultsAll 13 interviewees had used the FHT PoC tool, and feedback was largely positive. Overall, clinicians described engaging with the tool as a “prompt” or “reminder” system. Themes reflected that the tool’s goals and clinical content were aligned with clinician’s existing priorities and knowledge, and the tool’s design facilitated easy integration into existing workflows. The main barrier to implementation identified by 2 clinicians was notification fatigue. A total of 7 interviewees had used the FHT dashboard tool. The main barriers to use were its limited integration into clinical workflows, such that some participants did not know of its existence; clinicians’ competing clinical priorities; and limited time to learn and use the tool. ConclusionsThis study identified many facilitators for the successful use of the FHT PoC program, in the context of cardiovascular risk in CKD, and barriers to the use of the dashboard program. This work will be used to inform the wider implementation of FHT, as well as the development of future modules of FHT for other risk or disease states.https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2024/1/e55667 |
| spellingShingle | Caroline McBride Barbara Hunter Natalie Lumsden Kaleswari Somasundaram Rita McMorrow Douglas Boyle Jon Emery Craig Nelson Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis Clinical Acceptability of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in People With Chronic Kidney Disease in Australian General Practice: Qualitative Study JMIR Human Factors |
| title | Clinical Acceptability of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in People With Chronic Kidney Disease in Australian General Practice: Qualitative Study |
| title_full | Clinical Acceptability of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in People With Chronic Kidney Disease in Australian General Practice: Qualitative Study |
| title_fullStr | Clinical Acceptability of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in People With Chronic Kidney Disease in Australian General Practice: Qualitative Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Acceptability of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in People With Chronic Kidney Disease in Australian General Practice: Qualitative Study |
| title_short | Clinical Acceptability of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in People With Chronic Kidney Disease in Australian General Practice: Qualitative Study |
| title_sort | clinical acceptability of a quality improvement program for reducing cardiovascular disease risk in people with chronic kidney disease in australian general practice qualitative study |
| url | https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2024/1/e55667 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT carolinemcbride clinicalacceptabilityofaqualityimprovementprogramforreducingcardiovasculardiseaseriskinpeoplewithchronickidneydiseaseinaustraliangeneralpracticequalitativestudy AT barbarahunter clinicalacceptabilityofaqualityimprovementprogramforreducingcardiovasculardiseaseriskinpeoplewithchronickidneydiseaseinaustraliangeneralpracticequalitativestudy AT natalielumsden clinicalacceptabilityofaqualityimprovementprogramforreducingcardiovasculardiseaseriskinpeoplewithchronickidneydiseaseinaustraliangeneralpracticequalitativestudy AT kaleswarisomasundaram clinicalacceptabilityofaqualityimprovementprogramforreducingcardiovasculardiseaseriskinpeoplewithchronickidneydiseaseinaustraliangeneralpracticequalitativestudy AT ritamcmorrow clinicalacceptabilityofaqualityimprovementprogramforreducingcardiovasculardiseaseriskinpeoplewithchronickidneydiseaseinaustraliangeneralpracticequalitativestudy AT douglasboyle clinicalacceptabilityofaqualityimprovementprogramforreducingcardiovasculardiseaseriskinpeoplewithchronickidneydiseaseinaustraliangeneralpracticequalitativestudy AT jonemery clinicalacceptabilityofaqualityimprovementprogramforreducingcardiovasculardiseaseriskinpeoplewithchronickidneydiseaseinaustraliangeneralpracticequalitativestudy AT craignelson clinicalacceptabilityofaqualityimprovementprogramforreducingcardiovasculardiseaseriskinpeoplewithchronickidneydiseaseinaustraliangeneralpracticequalitativestudy AT joannemanskinankervis clinicalacceptabilityofaqualityimprovementprogramforreducingcardiovasculardiseaseriskinpeoplewithchronickidneydiseaseinaustraliangeneralpracticequalitativestudy |