Accentuation explains the difference between choice and rejection better than compatibility: A commentary on Chandrashekar et al. (2021)
In this comment, I examine the results of two studies (Shafir, 1993 and Chandrashekar et al., 2021) that relied on the same stimuli to examine the effect of framing selection tasks in terms of choosing versus rejecting, and discuss how, despite the failure of the later study to replicate the results...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Yoav Ganzach |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297524000263/type/journal_article |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
STUDY OF THE ACCENTUATED NEEDS OF YOUTH SATISFIED IN THE MEDIUM OF VIRTUAL SOCIAL NETWORKS
by: V. Voronin, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01) -
Linear incrementality in focus and accentuation processing during sentence production: evidence from eye movements
by: Zhenghua Zhang, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Compatible mappings and common fixed points revisited
by: Gerald Jungck
Published: (1994-01-01) -
Conditionally Compatible Mappings, Non-Compatible Mappings, Faintly Compatible Mappings and Some Results on Common Fixed Point in $C^*$-Algebra Valued Metric Space
by: Rishi Dhariwal, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Research on compatibility of high-performance network stack
by: Huiyou JIANG, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01)