Children’s Individual Differences in the Responses to a New Method for Physical Education

Children’s fundamental movement skills (FMS) require planned and guided interventions to develop appropriately. We investigated the effect of a novel Physical Education (PE) method to develop children’s object control, locomotor skills, and motor competence. Further, we examined children’s trainabil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara Pereira, Carla Santos, José Maia, Olga Vasconcelos, Eduardo Guimarães, Rui Garganta, Cláudio Farias, Tiago V. Barreira, Go Tani, Peter T. Katzmarzyk, Fernando Garbeloto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-11-01
Series:Sports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/12/12/328
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846102666788208640
author Sara Pereira
Carla Santos
José Maia
Olga Vasconcelos
Eduardo Guimarães
Rui Garganta
Cláudio Farias
Tiago V. Barreira
Go Tani
Peter T. Katzmarzyk
Fernando Garbeloto
author_facet Sara Pereira
Carla Santos
José Maia
Olga Vasconcelos
Eduardo Guimarães
Rui Garganta
Cláudio Farias
Tiago V. Barreira
Go Tani
Peter T. Katzmarzyk
Fernando Garbeloto
author_sort Sara Pereira
collection DOAJ
description Children’s fundamental movement skills (FMS) require planned and guided interventions to develop appropriately. We investigated the effect of a novel Physical Education (PE) method to develop children’s object control, locomotor skills, and motor competence. Further, we examined children’s trainability, i.e., their differential responses to the new method, and identified low and high responders to the intervention. The study lasted three months and included six to seven-year-old children in two groups: control (the current, official PE program; <i>n</i> = 38) and experimental (the new method; <i>n</i> = 52). Twelve FMS [object control (OC), locomotor (LO)] were reliably assessed using the Meu Educativo<sup>®</sup> app. Using a mixed-effects model, results showed that the experimental group experienced greater changes (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than the control group in OC and LO. Positive individual changes were more frequent with the new method, but children showed a similar pattern in their interindividual variability in both methods. There was a greater reduction in the number of children with lower proficiency in the experimental group. In sum, the new PE method proved superior to the current, official one. Individual responses to the new method showed considerable variation, highlighting the need for personalization in teaching strategies and necessary support for children with lower proficiency levels, ensuring that no child is left behind in their motor development process.
format Article
id doaj-art-bd5c901f0ab84cad8ad6a812bb5b55ff
institution Kabale University
issn 2075-4663
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sports
spelling doaj-art-bd5c901f0ab84cad8ad6a812bb5b55ff2024-12-27T14:54:31ZengMDPI AGSports2075-46632024-11-01121232810.3390/sports12120328Children’s Individual Differences in the Responses to a New Method for Physical EducationSara Pereira0Carla Santos1José Maia2Olga Vasconcelos3Eduardo Guimarães4Rui Garganta5Cláudio Farias6Tiago V. Barreira7Go Tani8Peter T. Katzmarzyk9Fernando Garbeloto10Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, PortugalCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, PortugalCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, PortugalCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, PortugalCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, PortugalCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, PortugalCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, PortugalDepartment of Exercise Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USAMotor Behavior Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sports, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-070, BrazilPennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USACentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, PortugalChildren’s fundamental movement skills (FMS) require planned and guided interventions to develop appropriately. We investigated the effect of a novel Physical Education (PE) method to develop children’s object control, locomotor skills, and motor competence. Further, we examined children’s trainability, i.e., their differential responses to the new method, and identified low and high responders to the intervention. The study lasted three months and included six to seven-year-old children in two groups: control (the current, official PE program; <i>n</i> = 38) and experimental (the new method; <i>n</i> = 52). Twelve FMS [object control (OC), locomotor (LO)] were reliably assessed using the Meu Educativo<sup>®</sup> app. Using a mixed-effects model, results showed that the experimental group experienced greater changes (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than the control group in OC and LO. Positive individual changes were more frequent with the new method, but children showed a similar pattern in their interindividual variability in both methods. There was a greater reduction in the number of children with lower proficiency in the experimental group. In sum, the new PE method proved superior to the current, official one. Individual responses to the new method showed considerable variation, highlighting the need for personalization in teaching strategies and necessary support for children with lower proficiency levels, ensuring that no child is left behind in their motor development process.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/12/12/328childrenfundamental movement skillsassessmentindividual differences
spellingShingle Sara Pereira
Carla Santos
José Maia
Olga Vasconcelos
Eduardo Guimarães
Rui Garganta
Cláudio Farias
Tiago V. Barreira
Go Tani
Peter T. Katzmarzyk
Fernando Garbeloto
Children’s Individual Differences in the Responses to a New Method for Physical Education
Sports
children
fundamental movement skills
assessment
individual differences
title Children’s Individual Differences in the Responses to a New Method for Physical Education
title_full Children’s Individual Differences in the Responses to a New Method for Physical Education
title_fullStr Children’s Individual Differences in the Responses to a New Method for Physical Education
title_full_unstemmed Children’s Individual Differences in the Responses to a New Method for Physical Education
title_short Children’s Individual Differences in the Responses to a New Method for Physical Education
title_sort children s individual differences in the responses to a new method for physical education
topic children
fundamental movement skills
assessment
individual differences
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/12/12/328
work_keys_str_mv AT sarapereira childrensindividualdifferencesintheresponsestoanewmethodforphysicaleducation
AT carlasantos childrensindividualdifferencesintheresponsestoanewmethodforphysicaleducation
AT josemaia childrensindividualdifferencesintheresponsestoanewmethodforphysicaleducation
AT olgavasconcelos childrensindividualdifferencesintheresponsestoanewmethodforphysicaleducation
AT eduardoguimaraes childrensindividualdifferencesintheresponsestoanewmethodforphysicaleducation
AT ruigarganta childrensindividualdifferencesintheresponsestoanewmethodforphysicaleducation
AT claudiofarias childrensindividualdifferencesintheresponsestoanewmethodforphysicaleducation
AT tiagovbarreira childrensindividualdifferencesintheresponsestoanewmethodforphysicaleducation
AT gotani childrensindividualdifferencesintheresponsestoanewmethodforphysicaleducation
AT petertkatzmarzyk childrensindividualdifferencesintheresponsestoanewmethodforphysicaleducation
AT fernandogarbeloto childrensindividualdifferencesintheresponsestoanewmethodforphysicaleducation