Laboratory Literacy: Surveying Lab Result Interpretations of a Local Patient Population

A patient's independent interpretation of their medical laboratory data has become an unspoken prerequisite in the current age of medicine. In the outpatient setting, it is anecdotally commonplace for patients to receive their lab results before their physicians, resulting in patients often rel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jordan Franco, Mark Fung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Beryl Institute 2024-11-01
Series:Patient Experience Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol11/iss3/17
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841554120893267968
author Jordan Franco
Mark Fung
author_facet Jordan Franco
Mark Fung
author_sort Jordan Franco
collection DOAJ
description A patient's independent interpretation of their medical laboratory data has become an unspoken prerequisite in the current age of medicine. In the outpatient setting, it is anecdotally commonplace for patients to receive their lab results before their physicians, resulting in patients often relying on self-interpretations of their results. This study analyzed the degree to which patients are comfortable interpreting lab results and sought to shed light on the question: How are patients interpreting their laboratory reports? A survey was constructed to include the items from a validated health literacy screening tool, followed by items inquiring about the respondent's experience and comfort interpreting medical lab reports. The survey then contained five sets of two questions, each asking the respondent to interpret a mock-up laboratory report associated with a disease state and to report their level of confidence in their answer. The survey was distributed to 173 patient advisors, of which 61 completed the survey. There was a statistically significant association between one's health literacy and one's confidence in interpreting lab results (p < 0.001). Additionally, respondents with a chronic disease were more confident in interpreting a within-range HbA1c compared to respondents without chronic disease (p < 0.05), although similar comparisons for other lab result types failed to yield statistically significant differences. This study detailed the lessons learned in conducting a health and laboratory literacy survey, a preliminary step towards developing a working knowledge of how patients relate to their lab results.
format Article
id doaj-art-bc12f3e2de7f48c1a01fa1250c46a492
institution Kabale University
issn 2372-0247
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher The Beryl Institute
record_format Article
series Patient Experience Journal
spelling doaj-art-bc12f3e2de7f48c1a01fa1250c46a4922025-01-08T20:21:43ZengThe Beryl InstitutePatient Experience Journal2372-02472024-11-0111310.35680/2372-0247.1966Laboratory Literacy: Surveying Lab Result Interpretations of a Local Patient PopulationJordan FrancoMark FungA patient's independent interpretation of their medical laboratory data has become an unspoken prerequisite in the current age of medicine. In the outpatient setting, it is anecdotally commonplace for patients to receive their lab results before their physicians, resulting in patients often relying on self-interpretations of their results. This study analyzed the degree to which patients are comfortable interpreting lab results and sought to shed light on the question: How are patients interpreting their laboratory reports? A survey was constructed to include the items from a validated health literacy screening tool, followed by items inquiring about the respondent's experience and comfort interpreting medical lab reports. The survey then contained five sets of two questions, each asking the respondent to interpret a mock-up laboratory report associated with a disease state and to report their level of confidence in their answer. The survey was distributed to 173 patient advisors, of which 61 completed the survey. There was a statistically significant association between one's health literacy and one's confidence in interpreting lab results (p < 0.001). Additionally, respondents with a chronic disease were more confident in interpreting a within-range HbA1c compared to respondents without chronic disease (p < 0.05), although similar comparisons for other lab result types failed to yield statistically significant differences. This study detailed the lessons learned in conducting a health and laboratory literacy survey, a preliminary step towards developing a working knowledge of how patients relate to their lab results.https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol11/iss3/17patient perceptionspatient engagementpatient experiencehealth literacylaboratory literacy
spellingShingle Jordan Franco
Mark Fung
Laboratory Literacy: Surveying Lab Result Interpretations of a Local Patient Population
Patient Experience Journal
patient perceptions
patient engagement
patient experience
health literacy
laboratory literacy
title Laboratory Literacy: Surveying Lab Result Interpretations of a Local Patient Population
title_full Laboratory Literacy: Surveying Lab Result Interpretations of a Local Patient Population
title_fullStr Laboratory Literacy: Surveying Lab Result Interpretations of a Local Patient Population
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory Literacy: Surveying Lab Result Interpretations of a Local Patient Population
title_short Laboratory Literacy: Surveying Lab Result Interpretations of a Local Patient Population
title_sort laboratory literacy surveying lab result interpretations of a local patient population
topic patient perceptions
patient engagement
patient experience
health literacy
laboratory literacy
url https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol11/iss3/17
work_keys_str_mv AT jordanfranco laboratoryliteracysurveyinglabresultinterpretationsofalocalpatientpopulation
AT markfung laboratoryliteracysurveyinglabresultinterpretationsofalocalpatientpopulation