What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies
Objectives Double checking is used in oncology to detect medication errors before administering chemotherapy. The objectives of the study were to determine the frequency of detected potential medication errors, i.e., mismatching information, and to better understand the nature of these inconsistenci...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-09-01
|
| Series: | BMJ Open |
| Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e039291.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841554117995003904 |
|---|---|
| author | Yvonne Pfeiffer Chantal Zimmermann David L. B. Schwappach |
| author_facet | Yvonne Pfeiffer Chantal Zimmermann David L. B. Schwappach |
| author_sort | Yvonne Pfeiffer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives Double checking is used in oncology to detect medication errors before administering chemotherapy. The objectives of the study were to determine the frequency of detected potential medication errors, i.e., mismatching information, and to better understand the nature of these inconsistencies.Design In observing checking procedures, field noteswere taken of all inconsistencies that nurses identified during double checking the order against the prepared chemotherapy.Setting Oncological wards and ambulatory infusion centres of three Swiss hospitals.Participants Nurses’ double checking was observed.Outcome measures In a qualitative analysis, (1) a category system for the inconsistencies was developed and (2) independently applied by two researchers.Results In 22 (3.2%) of 690 observed double checks, 28 chemotherapy-related inconsistencies were detected. Half of them related to non-matching information between order and drug label, while the other half was identified because the nurses used their own knowledge. 75% of the inconsistencies could be traced back to inappropriate orders, and the inconsistencies led to 33 subsequent or corrective actions.Conclusions In double check situations, the plausibility of the medication is often reviewed. Additionally, they serve as a correction for errors and that are made much earlier in the medication process, during order. Both results open up new opportunities for improving the medication process. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-acbe3ccd2770494e966c18fe287aaa55 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2044-6055 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-09-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMJ Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-acbe3ccd2770494e966c18fe287aaa552025-01-08T23:30:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-09-0110910.1136/bmjopen-2020-039291What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistenciesYvonne Pfeiffer0Chantal Zimmermann1David L. B. Schwappach2Research department, Stiftung fur Patientensicherheit, Zurich, Switzerland1 Research Department, Patient Safety Foundation, Zurich, SwitzerlandSwiss Patient Safety Foundation, Asylstr, Zurich, SwitzerlandObjectives Double checking is used in oncology to detect medication errors before administering chemotherapy. The objectives of the study were to determine the frequency of detected potential medication errors, i.e., mismatching information, and to better understand the nature of these inconsistencies.Design In observing checking procedures, field noteswere taken of all inconsistencies that nurses identified during double checking the order against the prepared chemotherapy.Setting Oncological wards and ambulatory infusion centres of three Swiss hospitals.Participants Nurses’ double checking was observed.Outcome measures In a qualitative analysis, (1) a category system for the inconsistencies was developed and (2) independently applied by two researchers.Results In 22 (3.2%) of 690 observed double checks, 28 chemotherapy-related inconsistencies were detected. Half of them related to non-matching information between order and drug label, while the other half was identified because the nurses used their own knowledge. 75% of the inconsistencies could be traced back to inappropriate orders, and the inconsistencies led to 33 subsequent or corrective actions.Conclusions In double check situations, the plausibility of the medication is often reviewed. Additionally, they serve as a correction for errors and that are made much earlier in the medication process, during order. Both results open up new opportunities for improving the medication process.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e039291.full |
| spellingShingle | Yvonne Pfeiffer Chantal Zimmermann David L. B. Schwappach What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies BMJ Open |
| title | What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies |
| title_full | What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies |
| title_fullStr | What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies |
| title_full_unstemmed | What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies |
| title_short | What do double-check routines actually detect? An observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies |
| title_sort | what do double check routines actually detect an observational assessment and qualitative analysis of identified inconsistencies |
| url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e039291.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yvonnepfeiffer whatdodoublecheckroutinesactuallydetectanobservationalassessmentandqualitativeanalysisofidentifiedinconsistencies AT chantalzimmermann whatdodoublecheckroutinesactuallydetectanobservationalassessmentandqualitativeanalysisofidentifiedinconsistencies AT davidlbschwappach whatdodoublecheckroutinesactuallydetectanobservationalassessmentandqualitativeanalysisofidentifiedinconsistencies |