Comparing Medical Record Abstraction (MRA) error rates in an observational study to pooled rates identified in the data quality literature

Comparing Medical Record Abstraction (MRA) error rates in an observational study to pooled rates identified in the data quality literature

Abstract Background Medical record abstraction (MRA) is a commonly used method for data collection in clinical research, but is prone to error, and the influence of quality control (QC) measures is seldom and inconsistently assessed during the course of a study. We employed a novel, standardized MRA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryam Y. Garza, Tremaine B. Williams, Songthip Ounpraseuth, Zhuopei Hu, Jeannette Lee, Jessica Snowden, Anita C. Walden, Alan E. Simon, Lori A. Devlin, Leslie W. Young, Meredith N. Zozus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Medical record abstraction
Data quality
Clinical research
Clinical data management
Data collection
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02424-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Internet

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02424-x

Similar Items