Matched versus Episodic Mentoring: The Processes and Outcomes for Law School Students Engaged in Professional Mentoring

Technology and social changes are moving legal education towards a crossroads, disrupting traditional modes of delivery, pedagogy and educational business models. Stakeholders such as law schools, law societies, accreditation bodies, quality assurance regulatory agencies and the judiciary face chall...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eileen S Johnson, Amy Timmer, Dawn E Chandler, Charles R Toy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bond University 2013-01-01
Series:Legal Education Review
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6272
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850210054011092992
author Eileen S Johnson
Amy Timmer
Dawn E Chandler
Charles R Toy
author_facet Eileen S Johnson
Amy Timmer
Dawn E Chandler
Charles R Toy
author_sort Eileen S Johnson
collection DOAJ
description Technology and social changes are moving legal education towards a crossroads, disrupting traditional modes of delivery, pedagogy and educational business models. Stakeholders such as law schools, law societies, accreditation bodies, quality assurance regulatory agencies and the judiciary face challenges presented by new modes of delivery of legal education and the potential for new non-university providers.
format Article
id doaj-art-a73825a75e7648888972d32f1ac52c4c
institution OA Journals
issn 1033-2839
1839-3713
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Bond University
record_format Article
series Legal Education Review
spelling doaj-art-a73825a75e7648888972d32f1ac52c4c2025-08-20T02:09:51ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-28391839-37132013-01-0123110.53300/001c.6272Matched versus Episodic Mentoring: The Processes and Outcomes for Law School Students Engaged in Professional MentoringEileen S JohnsonAmy TimmerDawn E ChandlerCharles R ToyTechnology and social changes are moving legal education towards a crossroads, disrupting traditional modes of delivery, pedagogy and educational business models. Stakeholders such as law schools, law societies, accreditation bodies, quality assurance regulatory agencies and the judiciary face challenges presented by new modes of delivery of legal education and the potential for new non-university providers.https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6272
spellingShingle Eileen S Johnson
Amy Timmer
Dawn E Chandler
Charles R Toy
Matched versus Episodic Mentoring: The Processes and Outcomes for Law School Students Engaged in Professional Mentoring
Legal Education Review
title Matched versus Episodic Mentoring: The Processes and Outcomes for Law School Students Engaged in Professional Mentoring
title_full Matched versus Episodic Mentoring: The Processes and Outcomes for Law School Students Engaged in Professional Mentoring
title_fullStr Matched versus Episodic Mentoring: The Processes and Outcomes for Law School Students Engaged in Professional Mentoring
title_full_unstemmed Matched versus Episodic Mentoring: The Processes and Outcomes for Law School Students Engaged in Professional Mentoring
title_short Matched versus Episodic Mentoring: The Processes and Outcomes for Law School Students Engaged in Professional Mentoring
title_sort matched versus episodic mentoring the processes and outcomes for law school students engaged in professional mentoring
url https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6272
work_keys_str_mv AT eileensjohnson matchedversusepisodicmentoringtheprocessesandoutcomesforlawschoolstudentsengagedinprofessionalmentoring
AT amytimmer matchedversusepisodicmentoringtheprocessesandoutcomesforlawschoolstudentsengagedinprofessionalmentoring
AT dawnechandler matchedversusepisodicmentoringtheprocessesandoutcomesforlawschoolstudentsengagedinprofessionalmentoring
AT charlesrtoy matchedversusepisodicmentoringtheprocessesandoutcomesforlawschoolstudentsengagedinprofessionalmentoring