THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL RETELLING STRATEGY AND WRITTEN RETELLING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION: A COMPARISON
Reading comprehension skill is important in our social lives which relates to texts, emails, networking sites, and many others. In order to find an effective teaching reading technique, there are studies conducted and developed. One of the strategies to teach reading is called retelling. Many studie...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
English Department of Antasari State Islamic University
2017-07-01
|
| Series: | LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/let/article/view/1513 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841545599874236416 |
|---|---|
| author | Vindy Cahya Ekaningrum |
| author_facet | Vindy Cahya Ekaningrum |
| author_sort | Vindy Cahya Ekaningrum |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Reading comprehension skill is important in our social lives which relates to texts, emails, networking sites, and many others. In order to find an effective teaching reading technique, there are studies conducted and developed. One of the strategies to teach reading is called retelling. Many studies found that retelling strategy is effective to teach reading comprehension (Sylvia(2015); Ebaugh (2013); Schisler (2008)). However, there is a contradictory result between those studies found related to the implementation of two types of retelling strategy: oral and written retelling. Sylvia’s (2015) study claims that the written retelling significantly better than oral retelling strategy. However, Schisler’s (2008) study shows result in vice versa. Ebaugh’s (2013) study reveals that there were no significant differences between those two strategies. From the contradictory results seen from previous studies, further study is still needed to figure out more reliable research result on the effectiveness of both strategies. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a4b6a33bf8404b06b97d3eff0cc3486a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2086-9606 2549-2454 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017-07-01 |
| publisher | English Department of Antasari State Islamic University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-a4b6a33bf8404b06b97d3eff0cc3486a2025-01-12T00:47:39ZengEnglish Department of Antasari State Islamic UniversityLET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal2086-96062549-24542017-07-017110.18592/let.v7i1.15131063THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL RETELLING STRATEGY AND WRITTEN RETELLING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION: A COMPARISONVindy Cahya Ekaningrum0Universitas Negeri Malang Malang, Jawa TimurReading comprehension skill is important in our social lives which relates to texts, emails, networking sites, and many others. In order to find an effective teaching reading technique, there are studies conducted and developed. One of the strategies to teach reading is called retelling. Many studies found that retelling strategy is effective to teach reading comprehension (Sylvia(2015); Ebaugh (2013); Schisler (2008)). However, there is a contradictory result between those studies found related to the implementation of two types of retelling strategy: oral and written retelling. Sylvia’s (2015) study claims that the written retelling significantly better than oral retelling strategy. However, Schisler’s (2008) study shows result in vice versa. Ebaugh’s (2013) study reveals that there were no significant differences between those two strategies. From the contradictory results seen from previous studies, further study is still needed to figure out more reliable research result on the effectiveness of both strategies.https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/let/article/view/1513Oral retellingWritten retellingReading comprehension. |
| spellingShingle | Vindy Cahya Ekaningrum THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL RETELLING STRATEGY AND WRITTEN RETELLING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION: A COMPARISON LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal Oral retelling Written retelling Reading comprehension. |
| title | THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL RETELLING STRATEGY AND WRITTEN RETELLING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION: A COMPARISON |
| title_full | THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL RETELLING STRATEGY AND WRITTEN RETELLING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION: A COMPARISON |
| title_fullStr | THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL RETELLING STRATEGY AND WRITTEN RETELLING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION: A COMPARISON |
| title_full_unstemmed | THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL RETELLING STRATEGY AND WRITTEN RETELLING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION: A COMPARISON |
| title_short | THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL RETELLING STRATEGY AND WRITTEN RETELLING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION: A COMPARISON |
| title_sort | effectiveness of oral retelling strategy and written retelling strategy on students reading comprehension a comparison |
| topic | Oral retelling Written retelling Reading comprehension. |
| url | https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/let/article/view/1513 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vindycahyaekaningrum theeffectivenessoforalretellingstrategyandwrittenretellingstrategyonstudentsreadingcomprehensionacomparison AT vindycahyaekaningrum effectivenessoforalretellingstrategyandwrittenretellingstrategyonstudentsreadingcomprehensionacomparison |