Retrospective Analysis of Master Protocols in Tumor‐Agnostic Drug Development: Evaluation of Application to Single‐Agent Therapies With ORR as the Endpoint for Approval of Oncology Drugs

ABSTRACT The first global approval of a microsatellite instability‐high solid tumors was a landmark in oncology, paving the way for targeted therapies approved globally. However, guidance remains limited regarding the biological and methodological conditions under which such designs, statistical bor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keiko Yamamoto, Kentaro Takeda, Hideki Maeda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-08-01
Series:Clinical and Translational Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70313
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849227172112236544
author Keiko Yamamoto
Kentaro Takeda
Hideki Maeda
author_facet Keiko Yamamoto
Kentaro Takeda
Hideki Maeda
author_sort Keiko Yamamoto
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT The first global approval of a microsatellite instability‐high solid tumors was a landmark in oncology, paving the way for targeted therapies approved globally. However, guidance remains limited regarding the biological and methodological conditions under which such designs, statistical borrowing, are most effective. We retrospectively evaluated the feasibility of tumor‐agnostic development using Bayesian modeling based on the objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint, focusing on single‐agent molecular targeted therapy (MTT) in Japan. Using Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) approval documents, we identified MTTs approved for ≥ 3 cancer types in Japan between 2001 and 2023. We analyzed whether their ORR in treatment lines without standard therapy exceeded thresholds using the beta‐binomial model (BBM) and hierarchical Bayesian model (HBM). Among 97 approved MTTs, 57 were for solid tumors or sarcomas, and 14 for ≥ 3 indications. Poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antibody‐drug conjugate (HER2 ADC) consistently exceeded thresholds in both models. In contrast, mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors showed generally consistent results across both models, although some exceeded the threshold while others did not, indicating considerable variability. This study evaluates single‐agent therapies using ORR as the primary endpoint; therefore, the findings may not apply to combination therapies or endpoints such as progression‐free survival or overall survival. Nevertheless, integrating Bayesian models and biological understanding can clarify when statistical borrowing is appropriate, particularly in biologically similar tumor types and improve interpretability and the strategic feasibility of basket trials in tumor‐agnostic development.
format Article
id doaj-art-a44a91f2f4d744df8a200ad67af1f30b
institution Kabale University
issn 1752-8054
1752-8062
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj-art-a44a91f2f4d744df8a200ad67af1f30b2025-08-23T17:10:42ZengWileyClinical and Translational Science1752-80541752-80622025-08-01188n/an/a10.1111/cts.70313Retrospective Analysis of Master Protocols in Tumor‐Agnostic Drug Development: Evaluation of Application to Single‐Agent Therapies With ORR as the Endpoint for Approval of Oncology DrugsKeiko Yamamoto0Kentaro Takeda1Hideki Maeda2Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Meiji Pharmaceutical University Tokyo JapanRegulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Meiji Pharmaceutical University Tokyo JapanRegulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Meiji Pharmaceutical University Tokyo JapanABSTRACT The first global approval of a microsatellite instability‐high solid tumors was a landmark in oncology, paving the way for targeted therapies approved globally. However, guidance remains limited regarding the biological and methodological conditions under which such designs, statistical borrowing, are most effective. We retrospectively evaluated the feasibility of tumor‐agnostic development using Bayesian modeling based on the objective response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint, focusing on single‐agent molecular targeted therapy (MTT) in Japan. Using Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) approval documents, we identified MTTs approved for ≥ 3 cancer types in Japan between 2001 and 2023. We analyzed whether their ORR in treatment lines without standard therapy exceeded thresholds using the beta‐binomial model (BBM) and hierarchical Bayesian model (HBM). Among 97 approved MTTs, 57 were for solid tumors or sarcomas, and 14 for ≥ 3 indications. Poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antibody‐drug conjugate (HER2 ADC) consistently exceeded thresholds in both models. In contrast, mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors showed generally consistent results across both models, although some exceeded the threshold while others did not, indicating considerable variability. This study evaluates single‐agent therapies using ORR as the primary endpoint; therefore, the findings may not apply to combination therapies or endpoints such as progression‐free survival or overall survival. Nevertheless, integrating Bayesian models and biological understanding can clarify when statistical borrowing is appropriate, particularly in biologically similar tumor types and improve interpretability and the strategic feasibility of basket trials in tumor‐agnostic development.https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70313basket trialdrug developmentprecision medicinetumor‐agnostic
spellingShingle Keiko Yamamoto
Kentaro Takeda
Hideki Maeda
Retrospective Analysis of Master Protocols in Tumor‐Agnostic Drug Development: Evaluation of Application to Single‐Agent Therapies With ORR as the Endpoint for Approval of Oncology Drugs
Clinical and Translational Science
basket trial
drug development
precision medicine
tumor‐agnostic
title Retrospective Analysis of Master Protocols in Tumor‐Agnostic Drug Development: Evaluation of Application to Single‐Agent Therapies With ORR as the Endpoint for Approval of Oncology Drugs
title_full Retrospective Analysis of Master Protocols in Tumor‐Agnostic Drug Development: Evaluation of Application to Single‐Agent Therapies With ORR as the Endpoint for Approval of Oncology Drugs
title_fullStr Retrospective Analysis of Master Protocols in Tumor‐Agnostic Drug Development: Evaluation of Application to Single‐Agent Therapies With ORR as the Endpoint for Approval of Oncology Drugs
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Analysis of Master Protocols in Tumor‐Agnostic Drug Development: Evaluation of Application to Single‐Agent Therapies With ORR as the Endpoint for Approval of Oncology Drugs
title_short Retrospective Analysis of Master Protocols in Tumor‐Agnostic Drug Development: Evaluation of Application to Single‐Agent Therapies With ORR as the Endpoint for Approval of Oncology Drugs
title_sort retrospective analysis of master protocols in tumor agnostic drug development evaluation of application to single agent therapies with orr as the endpoint for approval of oncology drugs
topic basket trial
drug development
precision medicine
tumor‐agnostic
url https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70313
work_keys_str_mv AT keikoyamamoto retrospectiveanalysisofmasterprotocolsintumoragnosticdrugdevelopmentevaluationofapplicationtosingleagenttherapieswithorrastheendpointforapprovalofoncologydrugs
AT kentarotakeda retrospectiveanalysisofmasterprotocolsintumoragnosticdrugdevelopmentevaluationofapplicationtosingleagenttherapieswithorrastheendpointforapprovalofoncologydrugs
AT hidekimaeda retrospectiveanalysisofmasterprotocolsintumoragnosticdrugdevelopmentevaluationofapplicationtosingleagenttherapieswithorrastheendpointforapprovalofoncologydrugs