Vidy sistematizatsii rossiiskogo zakonodatel'stva (Types of systematization of the Russian legislation)

Objective: to examine measures of administrative coercion applied to the media; to justify the need for changes to Articles 4 and 16 of the Law on mass media. Methods: the method of structural analysis, comparative-legal and formal legal methods. Results: The grounds for issuing warnings to mass me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: I. Y. Gol’Tyapina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd. 2014-09-01
Series:Russian Journal of Economics and Law
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/1696
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849333304567791616
author I. Y. Gol’Tyapina
author_facet I. Y. Gol’Tyapina
author_sort I. Y. Gol’Tyapina
collection DOAJ
description Objective: to examine measures of administrative coercion applied to the media; to justify the need for changes to Articles 4 and 16 of the Law on mass media. Methods: the method of structural analysis, comparative-legal and formal legal methods. Results: The grounds for issuing warnings to mass media editorial offices are researched; the uneven category of abuse of freedom of mass information is reviewed; the legal nature of a written warning to the mass media editorial offices is analyzed; bases of the termination of the media are listed; impropriety of the terms of Articles 4 and 16 of the Law on mass media is revealed. Scientific novelty: The author analyzes the legal nature of a written warning to the mass media editorial offices on the fact of abuse of mass media freedom; it is proved that this measure is administrative-preclusive (however, it is not considered by officials as the measure of administrative punishment). It is revealed that for the second abuse of mass information freedom media shall be subject to termination in contradiction with the current version of Article 16. In contradiction with the generally accepted norms, a more severe measure is imposed, in particular, when the editorial office has met the requirements set out in the warning. Practical value: The study can contribute to streamlining the regulation of administrative coercive measures applicable to the mass media editorial offices, both judicial and extrajudicial. In addition, certain provisions may be useful in further scientific research.
format Article
id doaj-art-a274f68963744c3cb06ab51a6ea3a2bc
institution Kabale University
issn 2782-2923
language English
publishDate 2014-09-01
publisher Tatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.
record_format Article
series Russian Journal of Economics and Law
spelling doaj-art-a274f68963744c3cb06ab51a6ea3a2bc2025-08-20T03:45:55ZengTatar Educational Center “Taglimat” Ltd.Russian Journal of Economics and Law2782-29232014-09-01032282341694Vidy sistematizatsii rossiiskogo zakonodatel'stva (Types of systematization of the Russian legislation)I. Y. Gol’Tyapina0Omsk State University for Transportation RoutesObjective: to examine measures of administrative coercion applied to the media; to justify the need for changes to Articles 4 and 16 of the Law on mass media. Methods: the method of structural analysis, comparative-legal and formal legal methods. Results: The grounds for issuing warnings to mass media editorial offices are researched; the uneven category of abuse of freedom of mass information is reviewed; the legal nature of a written warning to the mass media editorial offices is analyzed; bases of the termination of the media are listed; impropriety of the terms of Articles 4 and 16 of the Law on mass media is revealed. Scientific novelty: The author analyzes the legal nature of a written warning to the mass media editorial offices on the fact of abuse of mass media freedom; it is proved that this measure is administrative-preclusive (however, it is not considered by officials as the measure of administrative punishment). It is revealed that for the second abuse of mass information freedom media shall be subject to termination in contradiction with the current version of Article 16. In contradiction with the generally accepted norms, a more severe measure is imposed, in particular, when the editorial office has met the requirements set out in the warning. Practical value: The study can contribute to streamlining the regulation of administrative coercive measures applicable to the mass media editorial offices, both judicial and extrajudicial. In addition, certain provisions may be useful in further scientific research.https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/1696mass media, the termination of the mediathe abuse of mass information freedominformation securityadministrative and legal coercion
spellingShingle I. Y. Gol’Tyapina
Vidy sistematizatsii rossiiskogo zakonodatel'stva (Types of systematization of the Russian legislation)
Russian Journal of Economics and Law
mass media, the termination of the media
the abuse of mass information freedom
information security
administrative and legal coercion
title Vidy sistematizatsii rossiiskogo zakonodatel'stva (Types of systematization of the Russian legislation)
title_full Vidy sistematizatsii rossiiskogo zakonodatel'stva (Types of systematization of the Russian legislation)
title_fullStr Vidy sistematizatsii rossiiskogo zakonodatel'stva (Types of systematization of the Russian legislation)
title_full_unstemmed Vidy sistematizatsii rossiiskogo zakonodatel'stva (Types of systematization of the Russian legislation)
title_short Vidy sistematizatsii rossiiskogo zakonodatel'stva (Types of systematization of the Russian legislation)
title_sort vidy sistematizatsii rossiiskogo zakonodatel stva types of systematization of the russian legislation
topic mass media, the termination of the media
the abuse of mass information freedom
information security
administrative and legal coercion
url https://www.rusjel.ru/jour/article/view/1696
work_keys_str_mv AT iygoltyapina vidysistematizatsiirossiiskogozakonodatelstvatypesofsystematizationoftherussianlegislation