Passional Atheism, Passional Agnosticism and ‘The Will to Believe’
Jack Warman and Joshua Cockayne have recently claimed that the arguments that William James provides in his famous lecture ‘The Will to Believe’ to justify passional theism would equally justify passional atheism. They are correct in this claim, but there is in fact more than one way that a non-thei...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Daniel Molto |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Religions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/16/1/43 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The role of the language in making Sistan history’s thaumaturgies believable
by: Effat Neghabi, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
WILL TO TRUTH IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF PRAGMATISM
by: D. Y. Snitko
Published: (2017-12-01) -
THE SERVICE OF THE BELIEVERS: ARTICLE 55 OF THE 2015 CHURCH ORDER OF THE DUTCH REFORMED CHURCH IN PERSPECTIVE
by: P. Strauss
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Believing and Willing Within the Correlation Between the Willing and the Willed in Blondel’s Action: A Reinterpretation of Immanentism and Transcendence
by: Francesco de Nigris
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Pragmatizm’in “Ne”liği: Anlaşılması Zor “laştırılmış” Bir Felsefe
by: Fatih Arslan
Published: (2022-04-01)