The strategy used by the defence in the post-war trials set before the Supreme National Tribunalwith particular reference to the trials in Krakow

One of the most important conditions for a "fair trial" is not only the right of every defendant to a defense, but also the diligent work of lawyers. Post-war trials before the Supreme National Tribunal took place in an extremely difficult atmosphere. The communist takeover, especially in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joanna Lubecka
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow 2023-06-01
Series:Folia Historica Cracoviensia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.upjp2.edu.pl/foliahistoricacracoviensia/article/view/4836
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849222362100137984
author Joanna Lubecka
author_facet Joanna Lubecka
author_sort Joanna Lubecka
collection DOAJ
description One of the most important conditions for a "fair trial" is not only the right of every defendant to a defense, but also the diligent work of lawyers. Post-war trials before the Supreme National Tribunal took place in an extremely difficult atmosphere. The communist takeover, especially in the area of the judiciary, resulted in a departure from the principles of fair trial. However, before the NTN, accused Germans were defended by prominent pre-war attorneys who provided a guarantee that the highest standards of defense would be realized. Nevertheless, their work was extremely difficult. The course of the cruel German occupation resulted in a vengeful mood in society, with many Poles showing a lack of understanding of the need for judicial defense. Advocates, often themselves aggrieved by the German occupier, undertook defense ex officio, despite the perceived public reluctance. The article focuses on the role and strategy of the defense, particularly in terms of the mitigating circumstances presented by the attorneys, which were intended to soften sentences. The analysis presented in the text is intended to prove that the lawyers defending German defendants in trials before the NTN, fulfilled this duty in accordance with the principles of "fair trial" thereby significantly contributing to the perception of the Supreme National Tribunal as a court operating in accordance with the standards of Western civilization. 
format Article
id doaj-art-979b95b1e7b546fdbc0f2ec9d84953b8
institution Kabale University
issn 0867-8294
2391-6702
language deu
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow
record_format Article
series Folia Historica Cracoviensia
spelling doaj-art-979b95b1e7b546fdbc0f2ec9d84953b82025-08-26T06:17:01ZdeuThe Pontifical University of John Paul II in KrakowFolia Historica Cracoviensia0867-82942391-67022023-06-0129110.15633/fhc.29104The strategy used by the defence in the post-war trials set before the Supreme National Tribunalwith particular reference to the trials in KrakowJoanna Lubecka0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2965-7925University Ignatianum in Krakow One of the most important conditions for a "fair trial" is not only the right of every defendant to a defense, but also the diligent work of lawyers. Post-war trials before the Supreme National Tribunal took place in an extremely difficult atmosphere. The communist takeover, especially in the area of the judiciary, resulted in a departure from the principles of fair trial. However, before the NTN, accused Germans were defended by prominent pre-war attorneys who provided a guarantee that the highest standards of defense would be realized. Nevertheless, their work was extremely difficult. The course of the cruel German occupation resulted in a vengeful mood in society, with many Poles showing a lack of understanding of the need for judicial defense. Advocates, often themselves aggrieved by the German occupier, undertook defense ex officio, despite the perceived public reluctance. The article focuses on the role and strategy of the defense, particularly in terms of the mitigating circumstances presented by the attorneys, which were intended to soften sentences. The analysis presented in the text is intended to prove that the lawyers defending German defendants in trials before the NTN, fulfilled this duty in accordance with the principles of "fair trial" thereby significantly contributing to the perception of the Supreme National Tribunal as a court operating in accordance with the standards of Western civilization.  https://czasopisma.upjp2.edu.pl/foliahistoricacracoviensia/article/view/4836Supreme National TribunalGerman crimesPoland
spellingShingle Joanna Lubecka
The strategy used by the defence in the post-war trials set before the Supreme National Tribunalwith particular reference to the trials in Krakow
Folia Historica Cracoviensia
Supreme National Tribunal
German crimes
Poland
title The strategy used by the defence in the post-war trials set before the Supreme National Tribunalwith particular reference to the trials in Krakow
title_full The strategy used by the defence in the post-war trials set before the Supreme National Tribunalwith particular reference to the trials in Krakow
title_fullStr The strategy used by the defence in the post-war trials set before the Supreme National Tribunalwith particular reference to the trials in Krakow
title_full_unstemmed The strategy used by the defence in the post-war trials set before the Supreme National Tribunalwith particular reference to the trials in Krakow
title_short The strategy used by the defence in the post-war trials set before the Supreme National Tribunalwith particular reference to the trials in Krakow
title_sort strategy used by the defence in the post war trials set before the supreme national tribunalwith particular reference to the trials in krakow
topic Supreme National Tribunal
German crimes
Poland
url https://czasopisma.upjp2.edu.pl/foliahistoricacracoviensia/article/view/4836
work_keys_str_mv AT joannalubecka thestrategyusedbythedefenceinthepostwartrialssetbeforethesupremenationaltribunalwithparticularreferencetothetrialsinkrakow
AT joannalubecka strategyusedbythedefenceinthepostwartrialssetbeforethesupremenationaltribunalwithparticularreferencetothetrialsinkrakow