COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS TENCKHOFF CATHETER INSERTION (OPEN SURGERY VS LAPAROSCOPIC) – A CASE CONTROL STUDY

Objective: This study aims to investigate post-operative complication rate of Tenckhoff catheter placement methods between open surgery and laparoscopic. Material & Methods: This is a case control comparative study reviewed from the medical records of patients who required insertion, removal, o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Kusumajaya, Tjahjodjati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IKATAN AHLI UROLOGI INDONESIA 2025-01-01
Series:Jurnal Urologi Indonesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://juri.urologi.or.id/juri/article/view/902
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841554194104844288
author Christopher Kusumajaya
Tjahjodjati
author_facet Christopher Kusumajaya
Tjahjodjati
author_sort Christopher Kusumajaya
collection DOAJ
description Objective: This study aims to investigate post-operative complication rate of Tenckhoff catheter placement methods between open surgery and laparoscopic. Material & Methods: This is a case control comparative study reviewed from the medical records of patients who required insertion, removal, or repairment of Tenckhoff catheter for the provision of CAPD at Hasan Sadikin Bandung general hospital between January 2015 to December 2020. Clinical outcome and complication were compared between the open surgery and laparoscopic group. Results: We obtained 30 patients who required insertion of a Tenckhoff catheter for the provision of CAPD, 15 patients by open surgery and 15 patients by laparoscopic technique. Insertion of Tenckhoff catheter using open surgery have a higher risk of catheter migration (p=0.049; O R=3.25) and infection (p=0.014; OR=12.25) compared to laparoscopic. Discussion: Laparoscopic technique facilitates omentectomy, allows better fixation under direct visualisation, and for lysis of adhesions to increase peritoneal surface. Conclusion: Tenckhoff catheter insertion by using laparoscopic surgery tend to have better outcome compared to open surgery, with lower risk of catheter migration and infection. Keywords: Tenckhoff catheter, laparoscopic, CAPD.
format Article
id doaj-art-96f2ec2e14fc4cbead6f4cd54bc94824
institution Kabale University
issn 0853-442X
2355-1402
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IKATAN AHLI UROLOGI INDONESIA
record_format Article
series Jurnal Urologi Indonesia
spelling doaj-art-96f2ec2e14fc4cbead6f4cd54bc948242025-01-08T17:22:54ZengIKATAN AHLI UROLOGI INDONESIAJurnal Urologi Indonesia0853-442X2355-14022025-01-0132110.32421/juri.v32i1.902COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS TENCKHOFF CATHETER INSERTION (OPEN SURGERY VS LAPAROSCOPIC) – A CASE CONTROL STUDYChristopher Kusumajaya0Tjahjodjati1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine/University of Padjadjaran, Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung.Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine/University of Padjadjaran, Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung. Objective: This study aims to investigate post-operative complication rate of Tenckhoff catheter placement methods between open surgery and laparoscopic. Material & Methods: This is a case control comparative study reviewed from the medical records of patients who required insertion, removal, or repairment of Tenckhoff catheter for the provision of CAPD at Hasan Sadikin Bandung general hospital between January 2015 to December 2020. Clinical outcome and complication were compared between the open surgery and laparoscopic group. Results: We obtained 30 patients who required insertion of a Tenckhoff catheter for the provision of CAPD, 15 patients by open surgery and 15 patients by laparoscopic technique. Insertion of Tenckhoff catheter using open surgery have a higher risk of catheter migration (p=0.049; O R=3.25) and infection (p=0.014; OR=12.25) compared to laparoscopic. Discussion: Laparoscopic technique facilitates omentectomy, allows better fixation under direct visualisation, and for lysis of adhesions to increase peritoneal surface. Conclusion: Tenckhoff catheter insertion by using laparoscopic surgery tend to have better outcome compared to open surgery, with lower risk of catheter migration and infection. Keywords: Tenckhoff catheter, laparoscopic, CAPD. http://juri.urologi.or.id/juri/article/view/902Tenckhoff catheter, laparoscopic, CAPD.
spellingShingle Christopher Kusumajaya
Tjahjodjati
COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS TENCKHOFF CATHETER INSERTION (OPEN SURGERY VS LAPAROSCOPIC) – A CASE CONTROL STUDY
Jurnal Urologi Indonesia
Tenckhoff catheter, laparoscopic, CAPD.
title COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS TENCKHOFF CATHETER INSERTION (OPEN SURGERY VS LAPAROSCOPIC) – A CASE CONTROL STUDY
title_full COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS TENCKHOFF CATHETER INSERTION (OPEN SURGERY VS LAPAROSCOPIC) – A CASE CONTROL STUDY
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS TENCKHOFF CATHETER INSERTION (OPEN SURGERY VS LAPAROSCOPIC) – A CASE CONTROL STUDY
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS TENCKHOFF CATHETER INSERTION (OPEN SURGERY VS LAPAROSCOPIC) – A CASE CONTROL STUDY
title_short COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS TENCKHOFF CATHETER INSERTION (OPEN SURGERY VS LAPAROSCOPIC) – A CASE CONTROL STUDY
title_sort comparison of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis tenckhoff catheter insertion open surgery vs laparoscopic a case control study
topic Tenckhoff catheter, laparoscopic, CAPD.
url http://juri.urologi.or.id/juri/article/view/902
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherkusumajaya comparisonofcontinuousambulatoryperitonealdialysistenckhoffcatheterinsertionopensurgeryvslaparoscopicacasecontrolstudy
AT tjahjodjati comparisonofcontinuousambulatoryperitonealdialysistenckhoffcatheterinsertionopensurgeryvslaparoscopicacasecontrolstudy