Why Does Deliberative Community Consultation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions Fail? A Critical Analysis of Mozambican Experiences

Community consultation prior to large-scale land acquisitions (LSLA) is a cornerstone that justifies the portrayal of projects as partnerships or land grabs. This study focuses on one of the countries most targeted by LSLA in the last decade, namely, Mozambique. We examine the legal and theoretical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juliana PORSANI, Rickard LALANDER
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Zaragoza, Cátedra de Solidaridad y Ciudadanía Global 2018-11-01
Series:Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ried.unizar.es/index.php/revista/article/viewFile/274/pdf_1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841561347512336384
author Juliana PORSANI
Rickard LALANDER
author_facet Juliana PORSANI
Rickard LALANDER
author_sort Juliana PORSANI
collection DOAJ
description Community consultation prior to large-scale land acquisitions (LSLA) is a cornerstone that justifies the portrayal of projects as partnerships or land grabs. This study focuses on one of the countries most targeted by LSLA in the last decade, namely, Mozambique. We examine the legal and theoretical bases that support community consultations and analyse their corresponding everyday practices in Mozambique. The article argues that, although the existence of these participatory forums is inspired by normative ideals of popular deliberation, the prevailing practices in these spaces are diametrically opposed to deliberative foundations and values. As shown in this study, this mismatch between theory that is institutionalized in legal frameworks and practice derives largely from the interplay of hierarchical relations anchored in, inter alia, formal and customary ethnically based realms, gender disparities, and livelihood orientations. A core argument of the article is that any attempt to ameliorate these practices must consider critical insights regarding the centrality of enhancing social equality and inclusion in participatory spaces —challenges that are immense in places marked by deep structural inequalities.
format Article
id doaj-art-91b419e629454a0494969c657d0ca0d6
institution Kabale University
issn 2254-2035
2254-2035
language English
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher Universidad de Zaragoza, Cátedra de Solidaridad y Ciudadanía Global
record_format Article
series Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo
spelling doaj-art-91b419e629454a0494969c657d0ca0d62025-01-03T01:47:17ZengUniversidad de Zaragoza, Cátedra de Solidaridad y Ciudadanía GlobalRevista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo2254-20352254-20352018-11-0172164193https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.274Why Does Deliberative Community Consultation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions Fail? A Critical Analysis of Mozambican ExperiencesJuliana PORSANI0Rickard LALANDER1School of Natural Science, Technology and Environmental Studies Södertörn University (Sweden)School of Natural Science, Technology and Environmental Studies Södertörn University (Sweden)Community consultation prior to large-scale land acquisitions (LSLA) is a cornerstone that justifies the portrayal of projects as partnerships or land grabs. This study focuses on one of the countries most targeted by LSLA in the last decade, namely, Mozambique. We examine the legal and theoretical bases that support community consultations and analyse their corresponding everyday practices in Mozambique. The article argues that, although the existence of these participatory forums is inspired by normative ideals of popular deliberation, the prevailing practices in these spaces are diametrically opposed to deliberative foundations and values. As shown in this study, this mismatch between theory that is institutionalized in legal frameworks and practice derives largely from the interplay of hierarchical relations anchored in, inter alia, formal and customary ethnically based realms, gender disparities, and livelihood orientations. A core argument of the article is that any attempt to ameliorate these practices must consider critical insights regarding the centrality of enhancing social equality and inclusion in participatory spaces —challenges that are immense in places marked by deep structural inequalities.http://ried.unizar.es/index.php/revista/article/viewFile/274/pdf_1consultationdeliberative democracylarge-scale land acquisitionland grabbingland rights
spellingShingle Juliana PORSANI
Rickard LALANDER
Why Does Deliberative Community Consultation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions Fail? A Critical Analysis of Mozambican Experiences
Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo
consultation
deliberative democracy
large-scale land acquisition
land grabbing
land rights
title Why Does Deliberative Community Consultation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions Fail? A Critical Analysis of Mozambican Experiences
title_full Why Does Deliberative Community Consultation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions Fail? A Critical Analysis of Mozambican Experiences
title_fullStr Why Does Deliberative Community Consultation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions Fail? A Critical Analysis of Mozambican Experiences
title_full_unstemmed Why Does Deliberative Community Consultation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions Fail? A Critical Analysis of Mozambican Experiences
title_short Why Does Deliberative Community Consultation in Large-Scale Land Acquisitions Fail? A Critical Analysis of Mozambican Experiences
title_sort why does deliberative community consultation in large scale land acquisitions fail a critical analysis of mozambican experiences
topic consultation
deliberative democracy
large-scale land acquisition
land grabbing
land rights
url http://ried.unizar.es/index.php/revista/article/viewFile/274/pdf_1
work_keys_str_mv AT julianaporsani whydoesdeliberativecommunityconsultationinlargescalelandacquisitionsfailacriticalanalysisofmozambicanexperiences
AT rickardlalander whydoesdeliberativecommunityconsultationinlargescalelandacquisitionsfailacriticalanalysisofmozambicanexperiences