Death: One’s Ownmost Possibility (Freedom) or a Social Event? An Exploration of the Works of Martin Heidegger and Emmanuel Levinas

This study explored the works of Martin Heidegger and Emmanuel Levinas and how they both approached the subject of death, as to whether death should be understood in the context of one’s ownmost possibility or just a social event. This paper examined the notion of death as construed by both Levinas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anthony Kwaku Boakye
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Noyam Journals 2024-12-01
Series:E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://noyam.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EHASS202451619.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841557248287965184
author Anthony Kwaku Boakye
author_facet Anthony Kwaku Boakye
author_sort Anthony Kwaku Boakye
collection DOAJ
description This study explored the works of Martin Heidegger and Emmanuel Levinas and how they both approached the subject of death, as to whether death should be understood in the context of one’s ownmost possibility or just a social event. This paper examined the notion of death as construed by both Levinas and Heidegger and how it might help to understand the nature of the world, especially the question of how one dies. The methodology used in this study is qualitative. The understanding of death according to Heidegger has been grounded in his concept of Dasein the basic fact of our existence. Due to this, Dasein must live an authentic life through the recognition of mortality. Levinas strongly argues that to be responsible for the Other is deep-rooted in one’s subjective makeup. Hence, to meet the Face of the Other is to have the notion of meeting a Being in eternity. This is when one philosophizes beyond oneself by going beyond the limits of what the mind can tell. That goes beyond what Edmund Husserl and Heidegger emphasized, the phenomenon of being (the being of subjects and objects). In a sense, one goes beyond history and consciousness where even in death it is not only the I that dies but also the Other. This means death now becomes a relational activity. The death of the Other is the death of the entire community. This study will contribute to the scholarly understanding that one dies alone.
format Article
id doaj-art-8e32b1e968414039bde27ce8f61accfd
institution Kabale University
issn 2720-7722
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Noyam Journals
record_format Article
series E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
spelling doaj-art-8e32b1e968414039bde27ce8f61accfd2025-01-06T15:10:34ZengNoyam JournalsE-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences2720-77222024-12-015162923 2929https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.202451619Death: One’s Ownmost Possibility (Freedom) or a Social Event? An Exploration of the Works of Martin Heidegger and Emmanuel LevinasAnthony Kwaku Boakye0https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9373-3432Department of Philosophy and Classics, University of GhanaThis study explored the works of Martin Heidegger and Emmanuel Levinas and how they both approached the subject of death, as to whether death should be understood in the context of one’s ownmost possibility or just a social event. This paper examined the notion of death as construed by both Levinas and Heidegger and how it might help to understand the nature of the world, especially the question of how one dies. The methodology used in this study is qualitative. The understanding of death according to Heidegger has been grounded in his concept of Dasein the basic fact of our existence. Due to this, Dasein must live an authentic life through the recognition of mortality. Levinas strongly argues that to be responsible for the Other is deep-rooted in one’s subjective makeup. Hence, to meet the Face of the Other is to have the notion of meeting a Being in eternity. This is when one philosophizes beyond oneself by going beyond the limits of what the mind can tell. That goes beyond what Edmund Husserl and Heidegger emphasized, the phenomenon of being (the being of subjects and objects). In a sense, one goes beyond history and consciousness where even in death it is not only the I that dies but also the Other. This means death now becomes a relational activity. The death of the Other is the death of the entire community. This study will contribute to the scholarly understanding that one dies alone.https://noyam.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EHASS202451619.pdfdaseinauthenticityinauthenticityfaceresponsibility
spellingShingle Anthony Kwaku Boakye
Death: One’s Ownmost Possibility (Freedom) or a Social Event? An Exploration of the Works of Martin Heidegger and Emmanuel Levinas
E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
dasein
authenticity
inauthenticity
face
responsibility
title Death: One’s Ownmost Possibility (Freedom) or a Social Event? An Exploration of the Works of Martin Heidegger and Emmanuel Levinas
title_full Death: One’s Ownmost Possibility (Freedom) or a Social Event? An Exploration of the Works of Martin Heidegger and Emmanuel Levinas
title_fullStr Death: One’s Ownmost Possibility (Freedom) or a Social Event? An Exploration of the Works of Martin Heidegger and Emmanuel Levinas
title_full_unstemmed Death: One’s Ownmost Possibility (Freedom) or a Social Event? An Exploration of the Works of Martin Heidegger and Emmanuel Levinas
title_short Death: One’s Ownmost Possibility (Freedom) or a Social Event? An Exploration of the Works of Martin Heidegger and Emmanuel Levinas
title_sort death one s ownmost possibility freedom or a social event an exploration of the works of martin heidegger and emmanuel levinas
topic dasein
authenticity
inauthenticity
face
responsibility
url https://noyam.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/EHASS202451619.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT anthonykwakuboakye deathonesownmostpossibilityfreedomorasocialeventanexplorationoftheworksofmartinheideggerandemmanuellevinas