The Crisis of English Local Governance During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Breakdown of Central Control
The UK’s policy response to the Covid-19 pandemic reveals the problems that arise in a highly centralised polity where the executive faces few countervailing political pressures. Westminster is a power-hoarding political system despite two decades of devolution. Intergovernmental relations (IGR) mec...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Centre de Recherche et d'Etudes en Civilisation Britannique
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/12771 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841553109856288768 |
|---|---|
| author | Patrick Diamond Martin Laffin |
| author_facet | Patrick Diamond Martin Laffin |
| author_sort | Patrick Diamond |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The UK’s policy response to the Covid-19 pandemic reveals the problems that arise in a highly centralised polity where the executive faces few countervailing political pressures. Westminster is a power-hoarding political system despite two decades of devolution. Intergovernmental relations (IGR) mechanisms of coordination and conflict resolution have struggled to cope with the realities of a severely asymmetric devolution settlement, as was glaringly apparent during the Covid crisis. Ministers in central government resisted pressure from the three UK devolved nations and English city-region mayors to rebalance UK and English IGR mechanisms. Even at the centre, the UK’s policy response illustrates that the UK core executive is often unable to govern strategically, coordinating services across entrenched departmental and multi-level boundaries despite government ministers enjoying a largely unchecked capacity to initiate policies, programmes and major departmental reorganisations with significant IGR implications. This central response exposes how over the last three decades the UK government, as the “English” central government, has strengthened its control of local government through financial oversight and outsourcing of services to the non-state sector. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8ae7dd15ef754583b37af90744457f15 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0248-9015 2429-4373 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Centre de Recherche et d'Etudes en Civilisation Britannique |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique |
| spelling | doaj-art-8ae7dd15ef754583b37af90744457f152025-01-09T12:30:56ZengCentre de Recherche et d'Etudes en Civilisation BritanniqueRevue Française de Civilisation Britannique0248-90152429-43732024-12-0129410.4000/12vm3The Crisis of English Local Governance During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Breakdown of Central ControlPatrick DiamondMartin LaffinThe UK’s policy response to the Covid-19 pandemic reveals the problems that arise in a highly centralised polity where the executive faces few countervailing political pressures. Westminster is a power-hoarding political system despite two decades of devolution. Intergovernmental relations (IGR) mechanisms of coordination and conflict resolution have struggled to cope with the realities of a severely asymmetric devolution settlement, as was glaringly apparent during the Covid crisis. Ministers in central government resisted pressure from the three UK devolved nations and English city-region mayors to rebalance UK and English IGR mechanisms. Even at the centre, the UK’s policy response illustrates that the UK core executive is often unable to govern strategically, coordinating services across entrenched departmental and multi-level boundaries despite government ministers enjoying a largely unchecked capacity to initiate policies, programmes and major departmental reorganisations with significant IGR implications. This central response exposes how over the last three decades the UK government, as the “English” central government, has strengthened its control of local government through financial oversight and outsourcing of services to the non-state sector.https://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/12771governancestatelocal vs. centre relationshollowing-outdecentralizationoutsourcing |
| spellingShingle | Patrick Diamond Martin Laffin The Crisis of English Local Governance During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Breakdown of Central Control Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique governance state local vs. centre relations hollowing-out decentralization outsourcing |
| title | The Crisis of English Local Governance During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Breakdown of Central Control |
| title_full | The Crisis of English Local Governance During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Breakdown of Central Control |
| title_fullStr | The Crisis of English Local Governance During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Breakdown of Central Control |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Crisis of English Local Governance During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Breakdown of Central Control |
| title_short | The Crisis of English Local Governance During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Breakdown of Central Control |
| title_sort | crisis of english local governance during the covid 19 pandemic the breakdown of central control |
| topic | governance state local vs. centre relations hollowing-out decentralization outsourcing |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/12771 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT patrickdiamond thecrisisofenglishlocalgovernanceduringthecovid19pandemicthebreakdownofcentralcontrol AT martinlaffin thecrisisofenglishlocalgovernanceduringthecovid19pandemicthebreakdownofcentralcontrol AT patrickdiamond crisisofenglishlocalgovernanceduringthecovid19pandemicthebreakdownofcentralcontrol AT martinlaffin crisisofenglishlocalgovernanceduringthecovid19pandemicthebreakdownofcentralcontrol |