An Analysis of the Poetry of Azzedine Mihoubi and Ahmad Shāmlū Based on Pierre Guiraud’s Theory of Social Semiotic
Pierre Guiraud’s theory of social semiotics is part of his study on semiotics in which he categorizes signs into logical, aesthetic, and social. In this approach, signs are deemed by humans to be social phenomena with functions, contexts and impacts. Signs are concerned with the social meaning that...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Semnan University
2024-11-01
|
Series: | مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_9208_355e8e9c76e64cef5c8292e7afb858ca.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841527909064376320 |
---|---|
author | Atefeh Rahmani Mahin Hajizadeh Abdolahad Gheibi |
author_facet | Atefeh Rahmani Mahin Hajizadeh Abdolahad Gheibi |
author_sort | Atefeh Rahmani |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Pierre Guiraud’s theory of social semiotics is part of his study on semiotics in which he categorizes signs into logical, aesthetic, and social. In this approach, signs are deemed by humans to be social phenomena with functions, contexts and impacts. Signs are concerned with the social meaning that is present in texts and human societies. For a social semiologist, text is the background against which the meaning produced by social forces emerges. Using the comparative-analytic method based on the American School, this study has applied social semiotics to Azzedine Mihoubi and Ahmad Shāmlū’s poetry. The research results show that social semiotics in both poets’ works is manifested as codes of identity, tone, expletives, rituals and ceremonies, fashion and game. These codes have turned, in the form of shared themes and topics, into symbols as they enter the space of poetic experience and constitute a particular collection. Such collections, examined in the light of social codes, are among the similarities between the works of the two poets. By using each code, the concealed layers and poetic concepts can be grasped. However, the type of poetic (personal and social) feelings and cultural and religious differences are among the dissimilarities between the two poets’ work. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-86771bdec8a94199b75676a425891b04 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2008-9570 2717-090X |
language | fas |
publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
publisher | Semnan University |
record_format | Article |
series | مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی |
spelling | doaj-art-86771bdec8a94199b75676a425891b042025-01-15T05:56:48ZfasSemnan Universityمطالعات زبانی و بلاغی2008-95702717-090X2024-11-01153815118010.22075/jlrs.2024.32702.23909208An Analysis of the Poetry of Azzedine Mihoubi and Ahmad Shāmlū Based on Pierre Guiraud’s Theory of Social SemioticAtefeh Rahmani0Mahin Hajizadeh1Abdolahad Gheibi2Ph.D student of Arab Language and Literature, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Iran: (Corresponding Author)professor of Arab Language and Literature, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Iran.professor of Arab Language and Literature, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Iran.Pierre Guiraud’s theory of social semiotics is part of his study on semiotics in which he categorizes signs into logical, aesthetic, and social. In this approach, signs are deemed by humans to be social phenomena with functions, contexts and impacts. Signs are concerned with the social meaning that is present in texts and human societies. For a social semiologist, text is the background against which the meaning produced by social forces emerges. Using the comparative-analytic method based on the American School, this study has applied social semiotics to Azzedine Mihoubi and Ahmad Shāmlū’s poetry. The research results show that social semiotics in both poets’ works is manifested as codes of identity, tone, expletives, rituals and ceremonies, fashion and game. These codes have turned, in the form of shared themes and topics, into symbols as they enter the space of poetic experience and constitute a particular collection. Such collections, examined in the light of social codes, are among the similarities between the works of the two poets. By using each code, the concealed layers and poetic concepts can be grasped. However, the type of poetic (personal and social) feelings and cultural and religious differences are among the dissimilarities between the two poets’ work.https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_9208_355e8e9c76e64cef5c8292e7afb858ca.pdfsocial semioticpierre guiraudazzedine mihoubiahmad shāmlū |
spellingShingle | Atefeh Rahmani Mahin Hajizadeh Abdolahad Gheibi An Analysis of the Poetry of Azzedine Mihoubi and Ahmad Shāmlū Based on Pierre Guiraud’s Theory of Social Semiotic مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی social semiotic pierre guiraud azzedine mihoubi ahmad shāmlū |
title | An Analysis of the Poetry of Azzedine Mihoubi and Ahmad Shāmlū Based on Pierre Guiraud’s Theory of Social Semiotic |
title_full | An Analysis of the Poetry of Azzedine Mihoubi and Ahmad Shāmlū Based on Pierre Guiraud’s Theory of Social Semiotic |
title_fullStr | An Analysis of the Poetry of Azzedine Mihoubi and Ahmad Shāmlū Based on Pierre Guiraud’s Theory of Social Semiotic |
title_full_unstemmed | An Analysis of the Poetry of Azzedine Mihoubi and Ahmad Shāmlū Based on Pierre Guiraud’s Theory of Social Semiotic |
title_short | An Analysis of the Poetry of Azzedine Mihoubi and Ahmad Shāmlū Based on Pierre Guiraud’s Theory of Social Semiotic |
title_sort | analysis of the poetry of azzedine mihoubi and ahmad shamlu based on pierre guiraud s theory of social semiotic |
topic | social semiotic pierre guiraud azzedine mihoubi ahmad shāmlū |
url | https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_9208_355e8e9c76e64cef5c8292e7afb858ca.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atefehrahmani ananalysisofthepoetryofazzedinemihoubiandahmadshamlubasedonpierreguiraudstheoryofsocialsemiotic AT mahinhajizadeh ananalysisofthepoetryofazzedinemihoubiandahmadshamlubasedonpierreguiraudstheoryofsocialsemiotic AT abdolahadgheibi ananalysisofthepoetryofazzedinemihoubiandahmadshamlubasedonpierreguiraudstheoryofsocialsemiotic AT atefehrahmani analysisofthepoetryofazzedinemihoubiandahmadshamlubasedonpierreguiraudstheoryofsocialsemiotic AT mahinhajizadeh analysisofthepoetryofazzedinemihoubiandahmadshamlubasedonpierreguiraudstheoryofsocialsemiotic AT abdolahadgheibi analysisofthepoetryofazzedinemihoubiandahmadshamlubasedonpierreguiraudstheoryofsocialsemiotic |