Classification of inferior articular process injury after percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy based on CT three-dimensional reconstruction and its clinical significance
Abstract Objective To propose a new classification method based on CT three-dimensional reconstruction for inferior articular process injury following percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy (PEID), and to analyze the impact of > 50% inferior articular process(IAP) defect on clinic...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09004-0 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract Objective To propose a new classification method based on CT three-dimensional reconstruction for inferior articular process injury following percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy (PEID), and to analyze the impact of > 50% inferior articular process(IAP) defect on clinical outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 100 PEID patients. IAP injuries were classified into four types based on CT three-dimensional reconstruction, and the inter- and intra-observer reliability was assessed using the Kappa consistency test. Patients were divided into two groups based on IAP defect size: Group A (defect ≤ 50%) and Group B (defect > 50%). VAS, ODI, clinical outcomes, and lumbar instability were compared between the two groups, and IAP changes were observed. Results The classification showed good inter- and intra-observer consistency. There were no significant differences in VAS, ODI, clinical outcomes, or lumbar instability between the two groups (P > 0.05). Both groups showed varying degrees of IAP regeneration and remodeling. Conclusion The classification of IAP injuries based on CT three-dimensional reconstruction demonstrates good inter- and intra-observer consistency. In the short term, patients with > 50% IAP defects (Types III and IV) show no difference in lumbar stability or clinical outcomes compared to those with ≤ 50% defects (Types I and II).However, for patients with complete IAP loss (Type IV), the potential long-term risk of lumbar instability and related clinical complications remains a concern. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1471-2474 |