A Critical Review of Medemer from Ideological Perspectives

Medemer, both as a book and as an idea, is trapped between two extremes: admiration and rejection. Writers from both ends offer their thoughts, criticisms, and reviews of Medemer. The aim of this article is to analyze Medemer from an ideological perspective. Raising some political and policy questi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tefera Assefa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UJ Press 2024-09-01
Series:African Journal of Political Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/ajps/article/view/1345
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841557319328989184
author Tefera Assefa
author_facet Tefera Assefa
author_sort Tefera Assefa
collection DOAJ
description Medemer, both as a book and as an idea, is trapped between two extremes: admiration and rejection. Writers from both ends offer their thoughts, criticisms, and reviews of Medemer. The aim of this article is to analyze Medemer from an ideological perspective. Raising some political and policy questions about Medemer’s application is also the aim of this article. This article used a qualitative research approach and comparative and critical research methods. Secondary sources of data were used to compare Medemer with various political ideologies. Ideologically, Medemer meets the three criteria (critics of the present order, vision of the future society, and theory of change). Medemer is a “blended ideology” that combines concepts, principles, and ideas from liberalism, socialism, conservatism, and fascism. Furthermore, Medemer ideology attempted to combine concepts from opposing political ideologies and proposed it as a solution to Ethiopia’s complex sociopolitical and economic problems. Despite the government’s claim that Medemer is Ethiopia’s redeemer, several political questions remain unanswered given the country’s current situation. Therefore, the country’s complicated sociopolitical and economic problems under the regime of the Prosperity Party challenged the applicability of Medemer. Is Medemer thus the sole (or perhaps the only) instrument, policy framework, ideology, and mechanism for resolving Ethiopia’s multiple, dynamic, and complex socio-political problems? These remain a point of contention among academics and politicians.
format Article
id doaj-art-80ee857d5550403fb1efc4eb07203b2e
institution Kabale University
issn 1027-0353
1726-3727
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher UJ Press
record_format Article
series African Journal of Political Science
spelling doaj-art-80ee857d5550403fb1efc4eb07203b2e2025-01-06T13:30:46ZengUJ PressAfrican Journal of Political Science1027-03531726-37272024-09-0112110.36615/895x9t46A Critical Review of Medemer from Ideological PerspectivesTefera Assefa0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1066-2812Ambo University, Addis Ababa University Medemer, both as a book and as an idea, is trapped between two extremes: admiration and rejection. Writers from both ends offer their thoughts, criticisms, and reviews of Medemer. The aim of this article is to analyze Medemer from an ideological perspective. Raising some political and policy questions about Medemer’s application is also the aim of this article. This article used a qualitative research approach and comparative and critical research methods. Secondary sources of data were used to compare Medemer with various political ideologies. Ideologically, Medemer meets the three criteria (critics of the present order, vision of the future society, and theory of change). Medemer is a “blended ideology” that combines concepts, principles, and ideas from liberalism, socialism, conservatism, and fascism. Furthermore, Medemer ideology attempted to combine concepts from opposing political ideologies and proposed it as a solution to Ethiopia’s complex sociopolitical and economic problems. Despite the government’s claim that Medemer is Ethiopia’s redeemer, several political questions remain unanswered given the country’s current situation. Therefore, the country’s complicated sociopolitical and economic problems under the regime of the Prosperity Party challenged the applicability of Medemer. Is Medemer thus the sole (or perhaps the only) instrument, policy framework, ideology, and mechanism for resolving Ethiopia’s multiple, dynamic, and complex socio-political problems? These remain a point of contention among academics and politicians. https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/ajps/article/view/1345Blended IdeologyEthiopiaIdeologiesMedemer
spellingShingle Tefera Assefa
A Critical Review of Medemer from Ideological Perspectives
African Journal of Political Science
Blended Ideology
Ethiopia
Ideologies
Medemer
title A Critical Review of Medemer from Ideological Perspectives
title_full A Critical Review of Medemer from Ideological Perspectives
title_fullStr A Critical Review of Medemer from Ideological Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed A Critical Review of Medemer from Ideological Perspectives
title_short A Critical Review of Medemer from Ideological Perspectives
title_sort critical review of medemer from ideological perspectives
topic Blended Ideology
Ethiopia
Ideologies
Medemer
url https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/ajps/article/view/1345
work_keys_str_mv AT teferaassefa acriticalreviewofmedemerfromideologicalperspectives
AT teferaassefa criticalreviewofmedemerfromideologicalperspectives