Layers of Invisibility in Portuguese State Furniture Design, 1940-1974
If the buildings designed in Portugal by and for the state during the long rule of dictatorship are, still today, a challenging, often uncomfortable subject of enquiry – concealed by various layers of interpretation that render them virtually invisible despite their ubiquity –, the furniture that eq...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
TU Delft OPEN Publishing
2015-12-01
|
| Series: | Footprint |
| Online Access: | https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/991 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841524463886139392 |
|---|---|
| author | João Paulo Martins Sofia Diniz |
| author_facet | João Paulo Martins Sofia Diniz |
| author_sort | João Paulo Martins |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | If the buildings designed in Portugal by and for the state during the long rule of dictatorship are, still today, a challenging, often uncomfortable subject of enquiry – concealed by various layers of interpretation that render them virtually invisible despite their ubiquity –, the furniture that equipped those buildings is even more so. These were objects designed for everyday use, in which technological possibilities and material sturdiness were fundamental concerns, and their designers were frequently little-known architects working within the civil service sphere; better-known names, in turn, are seldom credited with having created the pieces that furnished their own buildings. Yet state-commissioned furniture design can also speak of other aspects of this apparently ordinary, largely invisible side of many architects’ everyday work in government offices. In this brief visual essay, snapshots of a long-term research project recently concluded at the School of Architecture, University of Lisbon prompt us to identify designers and commissioning agencies, locate them within their context(s) of production and discuss significant episodes where diverse aesthetical and ideological stances are followed, each with its own rhetoric: the rift between a generally conservative tutelage and some officials’ drive to keep up with international developments, for example, can be read in these inconspicuous objects and practices of the everyday. Our research, its outputs and initiatives (publications, exhibitions) have illuminated a facet of Portuguese design history that had previously been neglected, and brought in fresh arguments in support of the importance of quotidian artefacts for our understanding of built environment production. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-72668298b9874713a285ec1f4b916ad9 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1875-1504 1875-1490 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
| publisher | TU Delft OPEN Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Footprint |
| spelling | doaj-art-72668298b9874713a285ec1f4b916ad92025-02-03T05:53:08ZengTU Delft OPEN PublishingFootprint1875-15041875-14902015-12-019210.7480/footprint.9.2.991951Layers of Invisibility in Portuguese State Furniture Design, 1940-1974João Paulo Martins0Sofia DinizFaculty of Architecture University of LisbonIf the buildings designed in Portugal by and for the state during the long rule of dictatorship are, still today, a challenging, often uncomfortable subject of enquiry – concealed by various layers of interpretation that render them virtually invisible despite their ubiquity –, the furniture that equipped those buildings is even more so. These were objects designed for everyday use, in which technological possibilities and material sturdiness were fundamental concerns, and their designers were frequently little-known architects working within the civil service sphere; better-known names, in turn, are seldom credited with having created the pieces that furnished their own buildings. Yet state-commissioned furniture design can also speak of other aspects of this apparently ordinary, largely invisible side of many architects’ everyday work in government offices. In this brief visual essay, snapshots of a long-term research project recently concluded at the School of Architecture, University of Lisbon prompt us to identify designers and commissioning agencies, locate them within their context(s) of production and discuss significant episodes where diverse aesthetical and ideological stances are followed, each with its own rhetoric: the rift between a generally conservative tutelage and some officials’ drive to keep up with international developments, for example, can be read in these inconspicuous objects and practices of the everyday. Our research, its outputs and initiatives (publications, exhibitions) have illuminated a facet of Portuguese design history that had previously been neglected, and brought in fresh arguments in support of the importance of quotidian artefacts for our understanding of built environment production.https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/991 |
| spellingShingle | João Paulo Martins Sofia Diniz Layers of Invisibility in Portuguese State Furniture Design, 1940-1974 Footprint |
| title | Layers of Invisibility in Portuguese State Furniture Design, 1940-1974 |
| title_full | Layers of Invisibility in Portuguese State Furniture Design, 1940-1974 |
| title_fullStr | Layers of Invisibility in Portuguese State Furniture Design, 1940-1974 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Layers of Invisibility in Portuguese State Furniture Design, 1940-1974 |
| title_short | Layers of Invisibility in Portuguese State Furniture Design, 1940-1974 |
| title_sort | layers of invisibility in portuguese state furniture design 1940 1974 |
| url | https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/991 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT joaopaulomartins layersofinvisibilityinportuguesestatefurnituredesign19401974 AT sofiadiniz layersofinvisibilityinportuguesestatefurnituredesign19401974 |