Evaluating the Retreatability of Hydraulic Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealer Using Root Canal Instrumentation—An In Vitro Study
Aim: This study aimed to compare the retreatability of hydraulic calcium silicate-based (HCSB) and epoxy resin-based sealers in single-rooted mandibular premolars, with a specific focus on sealer remnants and retreatment duration. Methodology: Sixty mandibular premolars were biomechanically prepared...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1099_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Aim:
This study aimed to compare the retreatability of hydraulic calcium silicate-based (HCSB) and epoxy resin-based sealers in single-rooted mandibular premolars, with a specific focus on sealer remnants and retreatment duration.
Methodology:
Sixty mandibular premolars were biomechanically prepared and obturated with BioRoot RCS, MTA Fillapex, or AH Plus. After a one-month period, the gutta-percha was removed and the specimens were analyzed under a stereomicroscope.
Result:
BioRoot RCS showed the most remnants and longest retreatment time, while AH Plus was the most efficient.
Conclusion:
BioRoot RCS is less favorable for retreatment, with AH Plus being the most effective. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0976-4879 0975-7406 |