Influence of hip morphology on gluteal muscle biomechanics: a computational modeling study

Abstract Background Hip morphology variations, particularly in femoral neck shaft angle (NSA) and iliac wing width (IWW), have been associated with gluteal tendinopathy. However, the biomechanical implications of these morphological differences on gluteal muscle function are not well understood. Thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shangcheng Wang, Ryan Serbin, Kirby Bonvillain, Josef Jolissaint, Nahir Habet, Durham Weeks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08136-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841545051346305024
author Shangcheng Wang
Ryan Serbin
Kirby Bonvillain
Josef Jolissaint
Nahir Habet
Durham Weeks
author_facet Shangcheng Wang
Ryan Serbin
Kirby Bonvillain
Josef Jolissaint
Nahir Habet
Durham Weeks
author_sort Shangcheng Wang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Hip morphology variations, particularly in femoral neck shaft angle (NSA) and iliac wing width (IWW), have been associated with gluteal tendinopathy. However, the biomechanical implications of these morphological differences on gluteal muscle function are not well understood. This study investigates how NSA and IWW influence gluteal muscle forces, moment arms, and estimated tendon loads during walking, aiming to provide insights into the potential biomechanical pathways that may contribute to altered lateral hip loading patterns. Methods We modified a musculoskeletal model to reflect varying NSAs (108°, 123° and 143°) and IWWs (185, 265 and 345 mm), simulating nine gait cycles to assess the impact on the moment arms and loading of the gluteus medius (GMed) and minimus (Gmin) muscles. Results Models revealed that a high NSA with a narrow IWW (NSA143°/IWW185 mm) resulted in the shortest moment arms (GMed, 26 mm; Gmin, 29 mm) and highest peak muscle forces (GMed, 1240 N; GMin, 242 N), suggesting a biomechanical predisposition to gluteal tendinopathy. Conversely, a low NSA with a wide IWW (NSA108°/IWW345 mm) produced the longest moment arms (GMed, 47 mm; GMin, 45 mm) and lowest peak muscle forces (GMed, 742 N; GMin, 145 N). A 4° decrease in NSA reduced tensile load by 37 N (4.0%, p < 0.001) for GMed and 4 N (2.7%, p = 0.025) for GMin, with a minor increase in GMin compressive load by 2 N (1.8%, p = 0.048). A 10 mm decrease in IWW increased tensile and compressive loads by 12 N (1.3%, p < 0.001) and 20 N (20%, p < 0.001) for GMed, and by 3 N (2%, p < 0.007) and 3 N (2.7%, p < 0.007) for GMin. Conclusions Our biomechanical modeling suggests patients with narrow iliac width may be predisposed to gluteal tendinopathy through increased tendon loading. The protective mechanical effect of decreased neck shaft angle suggests its clinical association with tendinopathy likely involves other factors, such as IT band compression which was not accounted for in this study. For clinical assessment, iliac width measurement may help identify at-risk patients and guide preventive interventions, while neck shaft angle should be evaluated within a broader anatomical context.
format Article
id doaj-art-656a745978ad45ed843d60e2cc392389
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2474
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj-art-656a745978ad45ed843d60e2cc3923892025-01-12T12:04:48ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742025-01-012611910.1186/s12891-024-08136-zInfluence of hip morphology on gluteal muscle biomechanics: a computational modeling studyShangcheng Wang0Ryan Serbin1Kirby Bonvillain2Josef Jolissaint3Nahir Habet4Durham Weeks5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal InstituteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal InstituteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal InstituteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal InstituteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal InstituteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal InstituteAbstract Background Hip morphology variations, particularly in femoral neck shaft angle (NSA) and iliac wing width (IWW), have been associated with gluteal tendinopathy. However, the biomechanical implications of these morphological differences on gluteal muscle function are not well understood. This study investigates how NSA and IWW influence gluteal muscle forces, moment arms, and estimated tendon loads during walking, aiming to provide insights into the potential biomechanical pathways that may contribute to altered lateral hip loading patterns. Methods We modified a musculoskeletal model to reflect varying NSAs (108°, 123° and 143°) and IWWs (185, 265 and 345 mm), simulating nine gait cycles to assess the impact on the moment arms and loading of the gluteus medius (GMed) and minimus (Gmin) muscles. Results Models revealed that a high NSA with a narrow IWW (NSA143°/IWW185 mm) resulted in the shortest moment arms (GMed, 26 mm; Gmin, 29 mm) and highest peak muscle forces (GMed, 1240 N; GMin, 242 N), suggesting a biomechanical predisposition to gluteal tendinopathy. Conversely, a low NSA with a wide IWW (NSA108°/IWW345 mm) produced the longest moment arms (GMed, 47 mm; GMin, 45 mm) and lowest peak muscle forces (GMed, 742 N; GMin, 145 N). A 4° decrease in NSA reduced tensile load by 37 N (4.0%, p < 0.001) for GMed and 4 N (2.7%, p = 0.025) for GMin, with a minor increase in GMin compressive load by 2 N (1.8%, p = 0.048). A 10 mm decrease in IWW increased tensile and compressive loads by 12 N (1.3%, p < 0.001) and 20 N (20%, p < 0.001) for GMed, and by 3 N (2%, p < 0.007) and 3 N (2.7%, p < 0.007) for GMin. Conclusions Our biomechanical modeling suggests patients with narrow iliac width may be predisposed to gluteal tendinopathy through increased tendon loading. The protective mechanical effect of decreased neck shaft angle suggests its clinical association with tendinopathy likely involves other factors, such as IT band compression which was not accounted for in this study. For clinical assessment, iliac width measurement may help identify at-risk patients and guide preventive interventions, while neck shaft angle should be evaluated within a broader anatomical context.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08136-zBiomechanicsHip musclesHip shapeMoment armComputer modelling
spellingShingle Shangcheng Wang
Ryan Serbin
Kirby Bonvillain
Josef Jolissaint
Nahir Habet
Durham Weeks
Influence of hip morphology on gluteal muscle biomechanics: a computational modeling study
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Biomechanics
Hip muscles
Hip shape
Moment arm
Computer modelling
title Influence of hip morphology on gluteal muscle biomechanics: a computational modeling study
title_full Influence of hip morphology on gluteal muscle biomechanics: a computational modeling study
title_fullStr Influence of hip morphology on gluteal muscle biomechanics: a computational modeling study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of hip morphology on gluteal muscle biomechanics: a computational modeling study
title_short Influence of hip morphology on gluteal muscle biomechanics: a computational modeling study
title_sort influence of hip morphology on gluteal muscle biomechanics a computational modeling study
topic Biomechanics
Hip muscles
Hip shape
Moment arm
Computer modelling
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08136-z
work_keys_str_mv AT shangchengwang influenceofhipmorphologyonglutealmusclebiomechanicsacomputationalmodelingstudy
AT ryanserbin influenceofhipmorphologyonglutealmusclebiomechanicsacomputationalmodelingstudy
AT kirbybonvillain influenceofhipmorphologyonglutealmusclebiomechanicsacomputationalmodelingstudy
AT josefjolissaint influenceofhipmorphologyonglutealmusclebiomechanicsacomputationalmodelingstudy
AT nahirhabet influenceofhipmorphologyonglutealmusclebiomechanicsacomputationalmodelingstudy
AT durhamweeks influenceofhipmorphologyonglutealmusclebiomechanicsacomputationalmodelingstudy