Same, Same but Different: Proportionality Assessments and Equality Norms
Proportionality reasoning is an established form of legal argumentation under international human rights law, employed by the European Court of Human Rights and the United Nations (UN) human rights treaty bodies alike. However, relatively little has been written about its precise role and content in...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Anna Nilsson |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Scandinavian University Press
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | Oslo Law Review |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.idunn.no/oslo_law_review/2020/03/same_same_but_different_proportionality_assessments_and_e |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The Role of Equality and Non-Discrimination in Shaping Constitutional Gender Dynamics and Safeguarding Family Life
by: Danėlienė Ingrida
Published: (2025-07-01) -
CONSIDERATIONS ON THE IMPORTANCE OF OBSERVING HUMAN RIGHTS WITHIN EUROPEAN STATES
by: Isabela, STANCEA, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01) -
Legal Prerequisites for Gender Discrimination in the Russian Federation
by: D. T. Karamanukyan
Published: (2019-03-01) -
International Protection of the Rights of Forced Migrants in Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (Part I) (Summary)
by: D. V. Ivanov
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Protection of Human Rights in the European Court of Human Rights
by: Alexander V. Fomichev, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)