A systematic review of whether the number of linguistic errors in medical interpretation is associated with the use of professional vs ad hoc interpreters

A systematic review of whether the number of linguistic errors in medical interpretation is associated with the use of professional vs ad hoc interpreters

Abstract Medical consultations depend on a shared linguistic understanding between the patient and physician. When language concordance is not possible, interpretation is required. Prior studies have revealed that professional in-person interpretation (PIPI) results in patients reporting higher sati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iben Gad Lauridsen, Morten Deleuran Terkildsen, Lisbeth Uhrskov Sørensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:Archives of Public Health
Subjects:
Interpretation
Translation
Interpreting errors
Communication barriers
Limited English proficiency
Health care
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01461-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Internet

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01461-8

Similar Items