Evaluation of the human interaction with automated vehicles on highways

Human-driven vehicles (HVs) will be interacting with automated vehicles (AVs) at AV market penetrations between 0% and 100%. However, little is known about how HVs interact with AVs. This study addresses knowledge gaps related to how HVs will interact with AVs on highways. The research was conducted...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cadell Chand, Hisham Jashami, Haizhong Wang, David Hurwitz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Technology and Society, Faculty of Engineering, LTH, Lund University 2025-01-01
Series:Traffic Safety Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tsr.international/TSR/article/view/26985
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841548919412097024
author Cadell Chand
Hisham Jashami
Haizhong Wang
David Hurwitz
author_facet Cadell Chand
Hisham Jashami
Haizhong Wang
David Hurwitz
author_sort Cadell Chand
collection DOAJ
description Human-driven vehicles (HVs) will be interacting with automated vehicles (AVs) at AV market penetrations between 0% and 100%. However, little is known about how HVs interact with AVs. This study addresses knowledge gaps related to how HVs will interact with AVs on highways. The research was conducted in Oregon State University's Passenger Car Driving Simulator. Additionally, a Shimmer3 GSR+ sensor was used to measure participants' galvanic skin response (GSR). Two independent variables (i.e. leading vehicle speed and autonomy) were selected and resulted in a 2x2 factorial design. Participants were also exposed to two hard-braking scenarios: one with a leading HV and one with a leading AV. A post-drive survey included questions about the participant's level of comfort following HVs and AVs. The driving simulator experiment was successfully completed by 36 participants. Results from the linear mixed model show that driver level of stress was 70% higher in hard-brake scenarios involving HVs versus AVs. Of the 78 hard-braking scenarios tested in this study, 10 crashes were observed (4 with an HV, 6 with an AV). Half of the participants involved in a crash with an HV perceived the leading vehicle to be at fault, while all the participants who crashed with an AV blamed themselves for the error. Additionally, drivers over the age of 34.5 were found to give AVs 2% larger headways than HVs, while younger drivers gave AVs 18% smaller headways than HVs. Zero participants above the age of 34.5 years self-reported being ‘unconcerned’ when following an AV in the post-drive survey, while 38% of participants under the age of 34.5 did. This study supports the need for a better understanding of how human drivers will interact with AVs to calibrate human driver models when AV market penetrations are between 0% and 100%.
format Article
id doaj-art-572a59b3409c454d8e1cf6a9b34ec5df
institution Kabale University
issn 2004-3082
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Technology and Society, Faculty of Engineering, LTH, Lund University
record_format Article
series Traffic Safety Research
spelling doaj-art-572a59b3409c454d8e1cf6a9b34ec5df2025-01-10T13:21:13ZengTechnology and Society, Faculty of Engineering, LTH, Lund UniversityTraffic Safety Research2004-30822025-01-01910.55329/xwwy8052Evaluation of the human interaction with automated vehicles on highwaysCadell Chand0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7838-4265Hisham Jashami1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5511-7543Haizhong Wang2David Hurwitz3Oregon State University, the United States of AmericaOregon State University, the United States of AmericaOregon State University, the United States of AmericaOregon State University, the United States of AmericaHuman-driven vehicles (HVs) will be interacting with automated vehicles (AVs) at AV market penetrations between 0% and 100%. However, little is known about how HVs interact with AVs. This study addresses knowledge gaps related to how HVs will interact with AVs on highways. The research was conducted in Oregon State University's Passenger Car Driving Simulator. Additionally, a Shimmer3 GSR+ sensor was used to measure participants' galvanic skin response (GSR). Two independent variables (i.e. leading vehicle speed and autonomy) were selected and resulted in a 2x2 factorial design. Participants were also exposed to two hard-braking scenarios: one with a leading HV and one with a leading AV. A post-drive survey included questions about the participant's level of comfort following HVs and AVs. The driving simulator experiment was successfully completed by 36 participants. Results from the linear mixed model show that driver level of stress was 70% higher in hard-brake scenarios involving HVs versus AVs. Of the 78 hard-braking scenarios tested in this study, 10 crashes were observed (4 with an HV, 6 with an AV). Half of the participants involved in a crash with an HV perceived the leading vehicle to be at fault, while all the participants who crashed with an AV blamed themselves for the error. Additionally, drivers over the age of 34.5 were found to give AVs 2% larger headways than HVs, while younger drivers gave AVs 18% smaller headways than HVs. Zero participants above the age of 34.5 years self-reported being ‘unconcerned’ when following an AV in the post-drive survey, while 38% of participants under the age of 34.5 did. This study supports the need for a better understanding of how human drivers will interact with AVs to calibrate human driver models when AV market penetrations are between 0% and 100%. https://tsr.international/TSR/article/view/26985autonomous vehiclesdriving simulator
spellingShingle Cadell Chand
Hisham Jashami
Haizhong Wang
David Hurwitz
Evaluation of the human interaction with automated vehicles on highways
Traffic Safety Research
autonomous vehicles
driving simulator
title Evaluation of the human interaction with automated vehicles on highways
title_full Evaluation of the human interaction with automated vehicles on highways
title_fullStr Evaluation of the human interaction with automated vehicles on highways
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the human interaction with automated vehicles on highways
title_short Evaluation of the human interaction with automated vehicles on highways
title_sort evaluation of the human interaction with automated vehicles on highways
topic autonomous vehicles
driving simulator
url https://tsr.international/TSR/article/view/26985
work_keys_str_mv AT cadellchand evaluationofthehumaninteractionwithautomatedvehiclesonhighways
AT hishamjashami evaluationofthehumaninteractionwithautomatedvehiclesonhighways
AT haizhongwang evaluationofthehumaninteractionwithautomatedvehiclesonhighways
AT davidhurwitz evaluationofthehumaninteractionwithautomatedvehiclesonhighways