Environmental performance analysis of three organic waste disposal scenarios: landfilling, composting, and EP-50

Abstract The rapid increase in the population, urbanization, increasing standard of living, indifference, and other factors can be used to explain the concerning rate of waste generation. Research suggests that most countries prefer to process and dispose of their waste via open dumping or landfilli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohannad Aljarrah, Azad Ashraf, Amith Khandakar, Wesam Rohouma, Mohamed Arselene Ayari, Amin Esmaeili, Rohail Butt, Sruthi Kadampotupadeth, Kevin Thomas, Ahasanur Rahman, Michael Phillips
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2024-11-01
Series:Discover Sustainability
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00614-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846148102272057344
author Mohannad Aljarrah
Azad Ashraf
Amith Khandakar
Wesam Rohouma
Mohamed Arselene Ayari
Amin Esmaeili
Rohail Butt
Sruthi Kadampotupadeth
Kevin Thomas
Ahasanur Rahman
Michael Phillips
author_facet Mohannad Aljarrah
Azad Ashraf
Amith Khandakar
Wesam Rohouma
Mohamed Arselene Ayari
Amin Esmaeili
Rohail Butt
Sruthi Kadampotupadeth
Kevin Thomas
Ahasanur Rahman
Michael Phillips
author_sort Mohannad Aljarrah
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The rapid increase in the population, urbanization, increasing standard of living, indifference, and other factors can be used to explain the concerning rate of waste generation. Research suggests that most countries prefer to process and dispose of their waste via open dumping or landfilling due to its affordability and simple mechanism. However, leachate and landfill gas emissions present environmental risks associated with landfilling. To prevent landfilling’s detrimental impacts on the ecosystem, alternative methods of disposing of organic waste need to be investigated. An environmental impact analysis was undertaken utilizing the openLCA software to evaluate the ecological footprints of three distinct waste management strategies i.e., Landfilling, Composting, and composting using EP-50 assessing four key environmental indicators. Composting using EP-50 (EcoProbe 50) is a recent advancement towards waste management where organic waste is turned to compost artificially under high temperature and pressure along with constant mixing and churning of the waste for better nutrient value. The EP-50 composter, according to our research hypothesis, offers a greener option to conventional landfilling and composting. We evaluated the potential for global warming, acidification, eutrophication, and human toxicity of landfilling, conventional composting, and EP-50 composting utilizing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). According to our findings, the EP-50 system minimizes the potential for global warming to around 420 kgCO2 eq in comparison to 1243 kgCO2 eq from conventional composting and 4653 kgCO2 eq for landfilling. In addition, EP-50 increases the amount of nutrients in the compost generated while reducing the effects of eutrophication and acidification by more than 15%. These results demonstrate EP-50 as a scalable and effective method for managing organic waste.
format Article
id doaj-art-563c20e717b6411d8c9ab9e70950d99c
institution Kabale University
issn 2662-9984
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Discover Sustainability
spelling doaj-art-563c20e717b6411d8c9ab9e70950d99c2024-12-01T12:06:24ZengSpringerDiscover Sustainability2662-99842024-11-015112910.1007/s43621-024-00614-7Environmental performance analysis of three organic waste disposal scenarios: landfilling, composting, and EP-50Mohannad Aljarrah0Azad Ashraf1Amith Khandakar2Wesam Rohouma3Mohamed Arselene Ayari4Amin Esmaeili5Rohail Butt6Sruthi Kadampotupadeth7Kevin Thomas8Ahasanur Rahman9Michael Phillips10Chemical Engineering Department, University of Doha for Science and TechnologyChemical Engineering Department, University of Doha for Science and TechnologyDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar UniversityDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Doha for Science and TechnologyDepartment of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Qatar UniversityChemical Engineering Department, University of Doha for Science and TechnologyChemical Engineering Department, University of Doha for Science and TechnologyChemical Engineering Department, University of Doha for Science and TechnologyDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar UniversityDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Qatar UniversityApplied Research and Innovation, University of Doha for Science and TechnologyAbstract The rapid increase in the population, urbanization, increasing standard of living, indifference, and other factors can be used to explain the concerning rate of waste generation. Research suggests that most countries prefer to process and dispose of their waste via open dumping or landfilling due to its affordability and simple mechanism. However, leachate and landfill gas emissions present environmental risks associated with landfilling. To prevent landfilling’s detrimental impacts on the ecosystem, alternative methods of disposing of organic waste need to be investigated. An environmental impact analysis was undertaken utilizing the openLCA software to evaluate the ecological footprints of three distinct waste management strategies i.e., Landfilling, Composting, and composting using EP-50 assessing four key environmental indicators. Composting using EP-50 (EcoProbe 50) is a recent advancement towards waste management where organic waste is turned to compost artificially under high temperature and pressure along with constant mixing and churning of the waste for better nutrient value. The EP-50 composter, according to our research hypothesis, offers a greener option to conventional landfilling and composting. We evaluated the potential for global warming, acidification, eutrophication, and human toxicity of landfilling, conventional composting, and EP-50 composting utilizing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). According to our findings, the EP-50 system minimizes the potential for global warming to around 420 kgCO2 eq in comparison to 1243 kgCO2 eq from conventional composting and 4653 kgCO2 eq for landfilling. In addition, EP-50 increases the amount of nutrients in the compost generated while reducing the effects of eutrophication and acidification by more than 15%. These results demonstrate EP-50 as a scalable and effective method for managing organic waste.https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00614-7
spellingShingle Mohannad Aljarrah
Azad Ashraf
Amith Khandakar
Wesam Rohouma
Mohamed Arselene Ayari
Amin Esmaeili
Rohail Butt
Sruthi Kadampotupadeth
Kevin Thomas
Ahasanur Rahman
Michael Phillips
Environmental performance analysis of three organic waste disposal scenarios: landfilling, composting, and EP-50
Discover Sustainability
title Environmental performance analysis of three organic waste disposal scenarios: landfilling, composting, and EP-50
title_full Environmental performance analysis of three organic waste disposal scenarios: landfilling, composting, and EP-50
title_fullStr Environmental performance analysis of three organic waste disposal scenarios: landfilling, composting, and EP-50
title_full_unstemmed Environmental performance analysis of three organic waste disposal scenarios: landfilling, composting, and EP-50
title_short Environmental performance analysis of three organic waste disposal scenarios: landfilling, composting, and EP-50
title_sort environmental performance analysis of three organic waste disposal scenarios landfilling composting and ep 50
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00614-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mohannadaljarrah environmentalperformanceanalysisofthreeorganicwastedisposalscenarioslandfillingcompostingandep50
AT azadashraf environmentalperformanceanalysisofthreeorganicwastedisposalscenarioslandfillingcompostingandep50
AT amithkhandakar environmentalperformanceanalysisofthreeorganicwastedisposalscenarioslandfillingcompostingandep50
AT wesamrohouma environmentalperformanceanalysisofthreeorganicwastedisposalscenarioslandfillingcompostingandep50
AT mohamedarseleneayari environmentalperformanceanalysisofthreeorganicwastedisposalscenarioslandfillingcompostingandep50
AT aminesmaeili environmentalperformanceanalysisofthreeorganicwastedisposalscenarioslandfillingcompostingandep50
AT rohailbutt environmentalperformanceanalysisofthreeorganicwastedisposalscenarioslandfillingcompostingandep50
AT sruthikadampotupadeth environmentalperformanceanalysisofthreeorganicwastedisposalscenarioslandfillingcompostingandep50
AT kevinthomas environmentalperformanceanalysisofthreeorganicwastedisposalscenarioslandfillingcompostingandep50
AT ahasanurrahman environmentalperformanceanalysisofthreeorganicwastedisposalscenarioslandfillingcompostingandep50
AT michaelphillips environmentalperformanceanalysisofthreeorganicwastedisposalscenarioslandfillingcompostingandep50