Scientific Opinion on a review on the European Union Summary Reports on trends and sources zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food‐borne outbreaks in 2009 and 2010 – specifically for the data on Salmonella, Campylobacter, verotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and foodborne outbreaks

Abstract The European Union (EU) Summary Reports on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food‐borne outbreaks in 2009 and 2010 – specifically for the data on Salmonella, Campylobacter, verotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and foodborne outbreaks was reviewed. The mai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-06-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2726
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846150737757732864
author EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
author_facet EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
author_sort EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The European Union (EU) Summary Reports on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food‐borne outbreaks in 2009 and 2010 – specifically for the data on Salmonella, Campylobacter, verotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and foodborne outbreaks was reviewed. The main conclusions and recommendations are reported. Comparison between EU Member States (MSs) was found to be difficult due to the differences of the methods used, sampling schemes and reporting systems. Methods, sampling schemes and reporting systems among MSs should therefore be harmonised. When comparing MS‐specific trends, the impact of sample sizes, weight of samples and methodologies should be considered, as these variables could otherwise lead to misinterpretation of the data. Incidence data alone do not provide a full picture of the public health burden of zoonotic diseases. Fatalities provide another important insight. Ultimately, summary measures of public health such as disability adjusted life years (DALYs) and cost‐of‐illness estimates should be presented. Travel information was found to be still incomplete in many MSs. For many pathogens this hampers source attribution. To better understand the public health problems related to food and animal sources in the EU, it is desirable to differentiate between travel within and outside the EU. This would also be useful to better evaluate the public health impact of EU‐wide food safety measures. Whenever possible the data/results should be analysed using proper statistical tools. When data do not allow for this, the text should be kept to presenting the data without implying any patterns or trends.
format Article
id doaj-art-4ee243df633e45009ccaaef41c67e17c
institution Kabale University
issn 1831-4732
language English
publishDate 2012-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series EFSA Journal
spelling doaj-art-4ee243df633e45009ccaaef41c67e17c2024-11-28T09:25:50ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322012-06-01106n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2726Scientific Opinion on a review on the European Union Summary Reports on trends and sources zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food‐borne outbreaks in 2009 and 2010 – specifically for the data on Salmonella, Campylobacter, verotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and foodborne outbreaksEFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)Abstract The European Union (EU) Summary Reports on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food‐borne outbreaks in 2009 and 2010 – specifically for the data on Salmonella, Campylobacter, verotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and foodborne outbreaks was reviewed. The main conclusions and recommendations are reported. Comparison between EU Member States (MSs) was found to be difficult due to the differences of the methods used, sampling schemes and reporting systems. Methods, sampling schemes and reporting systems among MSs should therefore be harmonised. When comparing MS‐specific trends, the impact of sample sizes, weight of samples and methodologies should be considered, as these variables could otherwise lead to misinterpretation of the data. Incidence data alone do not provide a full picture of the public health burden of zoonotic diseases. Fatalities provide another important insight. Ultimately, summary measures of public health such as disability adjusted life years (DALYs) and cost‐of‐illness estimates should be presented. Travel information was found to be still incomplete in many MSs. For many pathogens this hampers source attribution. To better understand the public health problems related to food and animal sources in the EU, it is desirable to differentiate between travel within and outside the EU. This would also be useful to better evaluate the public health impact of EU‐wide food safety measures. Whenever possible the data/results should be analysed using proper statistical tools. When data do not allow for this, the text should be kept to presenting the data without implying any patterns or trends.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2726ReviewEuropean Community Summary Reports, 2009, 2010
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
Scientific Opinion on a review on the European Union Summary Reports on trends and sources zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food‐borne outbreaks in 2009 and 2010 – specifically for the data on Salmonella, Campylobacter, verotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and foodborne outbreaks
EFSA Journal
Review
European Community Summary Reports, 2009, 2010
title Scientific Opinion on a review on the European Union Summary Reports on trends and sources zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food‐borne outbreaks in 2009 and 2010 – specifically for the data on Salmonella, Campylobacter, verotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and foodborne outbreaks
title_full Scientific Opinion on a review on the European Union Summary Reports on trends and sources zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food‐borne outbreaks in 2009 and 2010 – specifically for the data on Salmonella, Campylobacter, verotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and foodborne outbreaks
title_fullStr Scientific Opinion on a review on the European Union Summary Reports on trends and sources zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food‐borne outbreaks in 2009 and 2010 – specifically for the data on Salmonella, Campylobacter, verotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and foodborne outbreaks
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Opinion on a review on the European Union Summary Reports on trends and sources zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food‐borne outbreaks in 2009 and 2010 – specifically for the data on Salmonella, Campylobacter, verotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and foodborne outbreaks
title_short Scientific Opinion on a review on the European Union Summary Reports on trends and sources zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food‐borne outbreaks in 2009 and 2010 – specifically for the data on Salmonella, Campylobacter, verotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and foodborne outbreaks
title_sort scientific opinion on a review on the european union summary reports on trends and sources zoonoses zoonotic agents and food borne outbreaks in 2009 and 2010 specifically for the data on salmonella campylobacter verotoxigenic escherichia coli listeria monocytogenes and foodborne outbreaks
topic Review
European Community Summary Reports, 2009, 2010
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2726
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonbiologicalhazardsbiohaz scientificopiniononareviewontheeuropeanunionsummaryreportsontrendsandsourceszoonoseszoonoticagentsandfoodborneoutbreaksin2009and2010specificallyforthedataonsalmonellacampylobacterverotoxigenicescherichiacolilisteriamonocytogenesandfoodborneoutbreaks