Murji'ah and Legitimacy of the Umayyads
The Murji'ah was one of the political-intellectual groups that in the first century of Islam, by avoiding judging the beliefs and positions of the active factions in the field of politics and society, entered the arena of existence in the turbulent Muslim society. It seems that the dual functio...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
2022-02-01
|
Series: | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_7547_18386e1789f8a49ff09bedd06c82cbab.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841555308985450496 |
---|---|
author | Shaban Ali Bidaki Muhammad Sepehri Mahmood Seyyed |
author_facet | Shaban Ali Bidaki Muhammad Sepehri Mahmood Seyyed |
author_sort | Shaban Ali Bidaki |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The Murji'ah was one of the political-intellectual groups that in the first century of Islam, by avoiding judging the beliefs and positions of the active factions in the field of politics and society, entered the arena of existence in the turbulent Muslim society. It seems that the dual function of the Murji'ah in history - compromise and confrontation with the government - and consequently the two-sided judgment about them, the duality in their thought and, better, the ambiguous nature of the word Murji'ah and its specific definition of faith, that is, the two main pillars of reference thinking go back. For this reason, the term Murji'ah has been used for a range of different intellectual and political currents and sometimes contradictions, and even in the case of Kharijites and Shiites. The central issue of the present study is what the type of confrontation and reaction of the Murji'ah difference in compromising and confronting the Umayyads was? The aim of this study is to show how the Umayyads used this dual Murji'ah approach to legitimize themselves. This research has been organized with a critical approach to previous research and with a descriptive-analytical view. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-49c61926861244f78ec48d103bcdc1a0 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2383-1650 |
language | fas |
publishDate | 2022-02-01 |
publisher | Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) |
record_format | Article |
series | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
spelling | doaj-art-49c61926861244f78ec48d103bcdc1a02025-01-08T05:41:13ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی2383-16502022-02-012112254610.30465/crtls.2021.38591.23907547Murji'ah and Legitimacy of the UmayyadsShaban Ali Bidaki0Muhammad Sepehri1Mahmood Seyyed2PhD Student in Islamic History, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, IranProfessor, Department of History, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, IranProfessor, Department of History, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, IranThe Murji'ah was one of the political-intellectual groups that in the first century of Islam, by avoiding judging the beliefs and positions of the active factions in the field of politics and society, entered the arena of existence in the turbulent Muslim society. It seems that the dual function of the Murji'ah in history - compromise and confrontation with the government - and consequently the two-sided judgment about them, the duality in their thought and, better, the ambiguous nature of the word Murji'ah and its specific definition of faith, that is, the two main pillars of reference thinking go back. For this reason, the term Murji'ah has been used for a range of different intellectual and political currents and sometimes contradictions, and even in the case of Kharijites and Shiites. The central issue of the present study is what the type of confrontation and reaction of the Murji'ah difference in compromising and confronting the Umayyads was? The aim of this study is to show how the Umayyads used this dual Murji'ah approach to legitimize themselves. This research has been organized with a critical approach to previous research and with a descriptive-analytical view.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_7547_18386e1789f8a49ff09bedd06c82cbab.pdfmurji'ahkhawarijumayyadsqadriyabattle of siffin |
spellingShingle | Shaban Ali Bidaki Muhammad Sepehri Mahmood Seyyed Murji'ah and Legitimacy of the Umayyads پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی murji'ah khawarij umayyads qadriya battle of siffin |
title | Murji'ah and Legitimacy of the Umayyads |
title_full | Murji'ah and Legitimacy of the Umayyads |
title_fullStr | Murji'ah and Legitimacy of the Umayyads |
title_full_unstemmed | Murji'ah and Legitimacy of the Umayyads |
title_short | Murji'ah and Legitimacy of the Umayyads |
title_sort | murji ah and legitimacy of the umayyads |
topic | murji'ah khawarij umayyads qadriya battle of siffin |
url | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_7547_18386e1789f8a49ff09bedd06c82cbab.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shabanalibidaki murjiahandlegitimacyoftheumayyads AT muhammadsepehri murjiahandlegitimacyoftheumayyads AT mahmoodseyyed murjiahandlegitimacyoftheumayyads |