Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study

Introduction: This study presents a comparative analysis of crestal bone levels, keratinized gingiva width (KGW), and gingival thickness (BGT) between basal and conventional dental implants over a 6-month period in the mandibular posterior region. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients were d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kshitibhushan Singh Pandaw, Sachin K Malagi, Dennis V Abraham, Saurabh Tembhurne, Sneha Banerjee, Arundhuti Mahato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1164_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841543530251550720
author Kshitibhushan Singh Pandaw
Sachin K Malagi
Dennis V Abraham
Saurabh Tembhurne
Sneha Banerjee
Arundhuti Mahato
author_facet Kshitibhushan Singh Pandaw
Sachin K Malagi
Dennis V Abraham
Saurabh Tembhurne
Sneha Banerjee
Arundhuti Mahato
author_sort Kshitibhushan Singh Pandaw
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: This study presents a comparative analysis of crestal bone levels, keratinized gingiva width (KGW), and gingival thickness (BGT) between basal and conventional dental implants over a 6-month period in the mandibular posterior region. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients were divided into two groups: Group A (basal implants) and Group B (conventional implants). Both groups underwent flapless implant placements, with immediate loading for basal implants and delayed loading for conventional implants. Results: The results demonstrated significant differences in crestal bone levels, KGW, and BGT between the two groups. The basal implant group exhibited greater mean changes in crestal bone levels (0.35 mm), KGW (0.27 mm), and BGT (0.30 mm) compared to the conventional implant group. These findings suggest a potentially higher risk of bone loss and soft tissue alterations with basal implants, likely due to the biomechanical stresses associated with immediate loading. Conclusion: The study concludes that while basal implants offer the advantage of immediate loading, they may also present challenges related to bone and soft tissue stability.
format Article
id doaj-art-46f03ec6f689457fb6d9a069ede297ec
institution Kabale University
issn 0976-4879
0975-7406
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-46f03ec6f689457fb6d9a069ede297ec2025-01-13T10:12:38ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062024-12-0116Suppl 4S3655S365710.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1164_24Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological StudyKshitibhushan Singh PandawSachin K MalagiDennis V AbrahamSaurabh TembhurneSneha BanerjeeArundhuti MahatoIntroduction: This study presents a comparative analysis of crestal bone levels, keratinized gingiva width (KGW), and gingival thickness (BGT) between basal and conventional dental implants over a 6-month period in the mandibular posterior region. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients were divided into two groups: Group A (basal implants) and Group B (conventional implants). Both groups underwent flapless implant placements, with immediate loading for basal implants and delayed loading for conventional implants. Results: The results demonstrated significant differences in crestal bone levels, KGW, and BGT between the two groups. The basal implant group exhibited greater mean changes in crestal bone levels (0.35 mm), KGW (0.27 mm), and BGT (0.30 mm) compared to the conventional implant group. These findings suggest a potentially higher risk of bone loss and soft tissue alterations with basal implants, likely due to the biomechanical stresses associated with immediate loading. Conclusion: The study concludes that while basal implants offer the advantage of immediate loading, they may also present challenges related to bone and soft tissue stability.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1164_24basal dental implantscrestal bone levelsgingival thicknesskeratinized gingiva width
spellingShingle Kshitibhushan Singh Pandaw
Sachin K Malagi
Dennis V Abraham
Saurabh Tembhurne
Sneha Banerjee
Arundhuti Mahato
Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
basal dental implants
crestal bone levels
gingival thickness
keratinized gingiva width
title Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study
title_full Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study
title_short Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study
title_sort comparative analysis of crestal bone levels of basal implants and conventional implants a clinico radiological study
topic basal dental implants
crestal bone levels
gingival thickness
keratinized gingiva width
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1164_24
work_keys_str_mv AT kshitibhushansinghpandaw comparativeanalysisofcrestalbonelevelsofbasalimplantsandconventionalimplantsaclinicoradiologicalstudy
AT sachinkmalagi comparativeanalysisofcrestalbonelevelsofbasalimplantsandconventionalimplantsaclinicoradiologicalstudy
AT dennisvabraham comparativeanalysisofcrestalbonelevelsofbasalimplantsandconventionalimplantsaclinicoradiologicalstudy
AT saurabhtembhurne comparativeanalysisofcrestalbonelevelsofbasalimplantsandconventionalimplantsaclinicoradiologicalstudy
AT snehabanerjee comparativeanalysisofcrestalbonelevelsofbasalimplantsandconventionalimplantsaclinicoradiologicalstudy
AT arundhutimahato comparativeanalysisofcrestalbonelevelsofbasalimplantsandconventionalimplantsaclinicoradiologicalstudy